Download PDF
Intensivmedizin up2date 2015; 11(01): 45-60
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1391409
Internistische Intensivmedizin
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Thrombozytenhemmung auf der Intensivstation

Daniel Dürschmied
,
Christoph Bode
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
12 February 2015 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category
Kernaussagen

  • Die wesentliche und relevanteste Indikation für eine Thrombozytenhemmung auf der Intensivstation ist das akute Koronarsyndrom. Hierfür wird derzeit ASS mit Ticagrelor oder Prasugrel kombiniert. Stentthrombosen sind mit dieser Therapie selten geworden.

  • Leitliniengerecht kann bei hoher Thrombuslast nach wie vor die Endstreckenblockade mit GPIIb/IIIa-Antagonisten eingesetzt werden. In diesen Fällen muss aber in besonderem Maße mit Blutungskomplikationen gerechnet werden.

  • Eine zusätzliche plasmatische Antikoagulation in therapeutischer Dosierung potenziert das Blutungsrisiko zusätzlich und sollte zeitlich und auf harte Indikationen begrenzt werden.

  • Mit Cangrelor wird möglicherweise bald ein i. v. applizierbarer ADP-Rezeptorantagonist zur Verfügung stehen.

  • Die Therapie von Patienten mit maschinell, medikamentös oder krankheitsbedingt induzierter Thrombozytopenie ist heikel und muss fortlaufend individuell angepasst werden.

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Hamm CW, Bassand JP, Agewall S et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2011; 32: 2999-3054
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Steg PG, James SK, Atar D et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 2012; 33: 2569-2619
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Baron TW, Faber TS, Grom A et al. Real-time assessment of acute myocardial ischaemia by an intra-thoracic 6-lead ECG: evaluation of a new diagnostic option in the implantable defibrillator. Europace 2006; 8: 994-1001
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Nichols M, Townsend N, Scarborough P et al. Trends in age-specific coronary heart disease mortality in the European Union over three decades: 1980-2009. Eur Heart J 2013; 34: 3017-3027
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Bruckenberger E. Deutscher Herzbericht 2011 (24. Bericht). Deutsche Herzstiftung 2012;
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Davi G, Patrono C. Platelet activation and atherothrombosis. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2482-2494
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Duerschmied D, Bode C, Moser M. Clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome: implications of recent study findings. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2010; 8: 1215-1229
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Mahaffey KW, Wojdyla DM, Carroll K et al. Ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel by geographic region in the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial. Circulation 2011; 124: 544-554
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 1045-1057
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Heestermans T, van’t Hof AW, ten Berg JM et al. The golden hour of prehospital reperfusion with triple antiplatelet therapy: a sub-analysis from the Ongoing Tirofiban in Myocardial Evaluation 2 (On-TIME 2) trial early initiation of triple antiplatelet therapy. Am Heart J 2010; 160: 1079-1084
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Montalescot G, Wiviott SD, Braunwald E et al. Prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (TRITON-TIMI 38): double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009; 373: 723-731
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Montalescot G, Bolognese L, Dudek D et al. Pretreatment with prasugrel in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 999-1010
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Mehta SR, Yusuf S, Peters RJ et al. Effects of pretreatment with clopidogrel and aspirin followed by long-term therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the PCI-CURE study. Lancet 2001; 358: 527-533
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Yusuf S, Zhao F, Mehta SR et al. Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 494-502
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Stone GW, Witzenbichler B, Guagliumi G et al. Heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor versus bivalirudin monotherapy and paclitaxel-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in acute myocardial infarction (HORIZONS-AMI): final 3-year results from a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2011; 377: 2193-2204
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Stone GW, Witzenbichler B, Guagliumi G et al. Bivalirudin during primary PCI in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 2218-2230
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Steg PG, van 't Hof A, Hamm CW et al. Bivalirudin started during emergency transport for primary PCI. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 2207-2217
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Zeymer U, van 't Hof A, Adgey J et al. Bivalirudin is superior to heparins alone with bailout GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction transported emergently for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a pre-specified analysis from the EUROMAX trial. Eur Heart J 2014; 35: 2460-2467
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Shahzad A, Kemp I, Mars C et al. Unfractionated heparin versus bivalirudin in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (HEAT-PPCI): an open-label, single centre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2014; 384: 1849-1858
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Giugliano RP, White JA, Bode C et al. Early versus delayed, provisional eptifibatide in acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 2176-2190
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Leon MB, Baim DS, Popma JJ et al. A clinical trial comparing three antithrombotic-drug regimens after coronary-artery stenting. Stent Anticoagulation Restenosis Study Investigators. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 1665-1671
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Duerschmied D, Bode C. Vorapaxar expands antiplatelet options. Which patients may benefit from thrombin receptor antagonism?. Hamostaseologie 2012; 32: 221-227
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Cannon CP. Oral platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors – part II. Clin Cardiol 2003; 26: 401-406
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Silvain J, Collet JP, Nagaswami C et al. Composition of coronary thrombus in acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57: 1359-1367
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Mega JL, Braunwald E, Wiviott SD et al. Rivaroxaban in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 9-19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Verheugt FW. Antithrombotic therapy during and after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2013; 128: 2058-2061
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Moser M, Olivier CB, Bode C. Triple antithrombotic therapy in cardiac patients: more questions than answers. Eur Heart J 2014; 35: 216-223
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Task Force M, Lip GY, Windecker S et al. Management of antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome and/or undergoing percutaneous coronary or valve interventions. Eur Heart J 2014; 35: 3155-3179
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Trenk D, Stone GW, Gawaz M et al. A randomized trial of prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with high platelet reactivity on clopidogrel after elective percutaneous coronary intervention with implantation of drug-eluting stents: results of the TRIGGER-PCI (Testing Platelet Reactivity In Patients Undergoing Elective Stent Placement on Clopidogrel to Guide Alternative Therapy With Prasugrel) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 59: 2159-2164
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Price MJ, Angiolillo DJ, Teirstein PS et al. Platelet reactivity and cardiovascular outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: a time-dependent analysis of the Gauging Responsiveness with a VerifyNow P2Y12 assay: Impact on Thrombosis and Safety (GRAVITAS) trial. Circulation 2011; 124: 1132-1137
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Circulation 2011; 124: e574-651
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Park SJ, Park DW, Kim YH et al. Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation of drug-eluting stents. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1374-1382
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Collet JP, Silvain J, Barthelemy O et al. Dual-antiplatelet treatment beyond 1 year after drug-eluting stent implantation (ARCTIC-Interruption): a randomised trial. Lancet 2014; 384: 1577-1585
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Valgimigli M, Campo G, Monti M et al. Short- versus long-term duration of dual-antiplatelet therapy after coronary stenting: a randomized multicenter trial. Circulation 2012; 125: 2015-2026
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2001-2015
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, Angiolillo DJ et al. Greater clinical benefit of more intensive oral antiplatelet therapy with prasugrel in patients with diabetes mellitus in the trial to assess improvement in therapeutic outcomes by optimizing platelet inhibition with prasugrel-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 38. Circulation 2008; 118: 1626-1636
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Tricoci P, Huang Z, Held C et al. Thrombin-receptor antagonist vorapaxar in acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 20-33
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Leonardi S, Tricoci P, White HD et al. Effect of vorapaxar on myocardial infarction in the thrombin receptor antagonist for clinical event reduction in acute coronary syndrome (TRA. CER) trial.. Eur Heart J 2013; 34: 1723-1731
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Morrow DA, Braunwald E, Bonaca MP et al. Vorapaxar in the secondary prevention of atherothrombotic events. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 1404-1413
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Harrington RA, Stone GW, McNulty S et al. Platelet inhibition with cangrelor in patients undergoing PCI. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 2318-2329
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Bhatt DL, Lincoff AM, Gibson CM et al. Intravenous platelet blockade with cangrelor during PCI. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 2330-2341
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Bhatt DL, Stone GW, Mahaffey KW et al. Effect of platelet inhibition with cangrelor during PCI on ischemic events. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 1303-1313
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Steg PG, Bhatt DL, Hamm CW et al. Effect of cangrelor on periprocedural outcomes in percutaneous coronary interventions: a pooled analysis of patient-level data. Lancet 2013; 382: 1981-1992
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Angiolillo DJ, Firstenberg MS, Price MJ et al. Bridging antiplatelet therapy with cangrelor in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2012; 307: 265-274
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar