Endoscopy, Table of Contents Endoscopy 2015; 47(04): 379DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1391860 Letters to the editor © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York Reply to Konge et al. Vivian E. Ekkelenkamp , Erik A. J. Rauws , Robert A. de Man , Ernst J. Kuipers , Arjun D. Koch Recommend Article Abstract Buy Article Full Text References References 1 Ekkelenkamp VE, Koch AD, Rauws EA et al. Competence development in ERCP: the learning curve of novice trainees. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 949-955 2 Ekkelenkamp VE, Koch AD, Haringsma J et al. Quality evaluation through self-assessment: a novel method to gain insight into ERCP performance. Frontline Gastroenterol 2014; 5: 10-16 3 Cotton PB, Romagnuolo J, Faigel DO et al. The ERCP quality network: a pilot study of benchmarking practice and performance. Am J Med Qual 2013; 28: 256-260 4 Kapral C, Muhlberger A, Wewalka F et al. Quality assessment of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: results of a running nationwide Austrian benchmarking project after 5 years of implementation. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 24: 1447-1454 5 Williams EJ, Ogollah R, Thomas P et al. What predicts failed cannulation and therapy at ERCP? Results of a large-scale multicenter analysis. . Endoscopy 2012; 44: 674-683 6 Osborn A, Parnes SJ. Osborn–Parnes approach to creative problem solving. Available at: www.cpsb.com 1960 Accessed 11 January 2012
