J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2015; 76(04): 262-265
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1395490
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Endonasal Access to the Upper Cervical Spine: Part 2—Cadaveric Analysis

Harminder Singh
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford Hospitals and Clinics, Stanford, California, United States
,
Robert M. Lober
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford Hospitals and Clinics, Stanford, California, United States
,
Gurpal S. Virdi
2   Medical Scholars Program, St. Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
,
Hector Lopez
3   Department of Pathology, Anatomy and Cell Biology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
,
Marc Rosen
4   Department of Otolaryngology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
5   Department of Neurological Surgery, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
,
James Evans
4   Department of Otolaryngology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
5   Department of Neurological Surgery, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

22. August 2014

22. August 2014

Publikationsdatum:
04. März 2015 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Objectives The study aims to determine factors that augment endonasal exposure of the cervical spine.

Setting We used fluoroscopy and endoscopy to study endonasal visualization of the upper cervical spine.

Participants Ten cadavers with normal anatomy were studied.

Main Outcome Measures Endoscopic visualization was simulated with projected lines from an endoscope to the cervical spine in multiple positions.

Results Neck position alone did not affect the extent of endonasal exposure of the upper cervical spine, although there was a trend correlating the extended neck position with more caudal exposure. The greatest impact was with concurrent use of a 30-degree endoscope and neck extension, and more caudal access was achieved by tilting the endoscope against the piriform aperture, using the posterior tip of the hard palate as the fulcrum.

Conclusions Concurrent use of a 30-degree endoscope and neck extension increased the degree of exposure down the cervical spine. Maximum endonasal exposure of the upper cervical spine was obtained by maneuvering instruments at the fulcrum of the posterior hard palate and the nares, rather than changing the position of the neck alone. These results complement radiographic morphometric data in Part 1 of this study for preoperative assessment and surgical planning.