Eur J Pediatr Surg 2016; 26(02): 219-220
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1544051
Letter to the Editor
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Evidence for Thoracoscopic Ligation of Patent Ductus Arteriosus

Valerio Gentilino
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Milano, Italy
,
Francesco Macchini
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Milano, Italy
,
Anna Morandi
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Milano, Italy
,
Ernesto Leva
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Milano, Italy
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

07. November 2014

12. November 2014

Publikationsdatum:
05. Februar 2015 (online)

Preview

We read with great interest the publication by Dingemann et al[1] concerning the best available level of evidence for thoracoscopic procedures in pediatric surgery.

Five surgical procedures have been investigated: congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair, esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula repair, lung resection, treatment of pneumothorax, and resection of neuroblastoma. The authors state that only retrospective comparative studies (RCS) are available, thus reaching level III of evidence according to the “Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM).” They conclude that randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and the corresponding open procedures are mandatory to obtain the highest possible evidence.

We applied the authors' criteria to a surgical procedure that, despite usually performed by cardiothoracic surgeons, we have recently adopted in our department, namely, the patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) thoracoscopic ligation.

To the best of our knowledge (PubMed accessed on November 7, 2014), there are neither RCTs nor systematic review/meta-analysis available. We could find three RCSs. Only statistically significant data are reported in [Table 1].[2] [3] [4]

Table 1

Details of RCS providing evidence for VATS versus open procedures in PDA ligation

References

Study type

CEBM levels

Advantage of VATS versus open

Disadvantage of VATS versus open

Kennedy et al[2]

RCS

3b

None

None

Vanamo et al[3]

RCS

3b

Shorter operative time

None

Faster recovery

Shorter hospital stay

Duration of pleural drainage

Chen et al[4]

RCS

3b

Shorter operative time

None

Lower postoperative temperature

Better cost effectiveness

Fewer acute complications

Fewer residual shunt

Fewer scoliosis

Abbreviations: CEBM, Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine; PDA, patent ductus arteriosus; RCS, retrospective comparative studies; VATS, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.


Furthermore, our search revealed some relevant case series[5] [6] [7] (level IV of CEBM) stating that the VATS technique for PDA closure is simple, effective, rapid, cost-effective, and more convenient for the patient. It requires a shorter hospital stay and carries cosmetic benefits compared with the conventional thoracotomy.[8] Moreover, some authors describe the application of VATS for PDA ligation in very low-birth-weight infants.[9]

In view of such considerations and after specific training, we recently adopted VATS for PDA ligation, and our preliminary results reflect other authors' experiences. In the absence of level I and II evidences, it has been suggested to follow the trail to the next best external evidence and work from there.[10]

We therefore believe that adequately trained pediatric surgeons willing to perform thoracoscopic PDA ligation can safely move from open surgical technique to VATS.