Download PDF
Der Klinikarzt 2015; 44(4): 202-209
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1552577
Schwerpunkt
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Hot Topics in der Koloskopie – Neuerungen zur Verbesserung der Diagnose und Therapie von Neoplasien

Hot topics in colonoscopy – Advances to improve the diagnosis of and therapy for neoplasias
Peter Klare
1   II. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München
,
Ellen Nötzel
2   Innere Medizin I, Sana Klinikum Lichtenberg, Berlin
,
Stefan von Delius
1   II. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München
,
Jörg Albert
3   Medizinische Klinik 1, Johann Wolfgang von Goethe Universität, Frankfurt
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
30 April 2015 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Verbesserte Diagnosemöglichkeiten haben in den letzten Jahren dazu geführt, dass die Detektionsrate von adenomatösen Polypen weiter gesteigert werden konnte. Entscheidend hat dazu die Etablierung von hochauflösenden Videoendoskopen beigetragen. Weitere Neuerungen, wie die Nutzung eines vergrößerten Bildausschnitts, erzielten in ersten Studien positive Ergebnisse hinsichtlich einer Steigerung der Adenomdetektionsrate. Durch die Verwendung von virtuellen Färbetechniken können kolorektale Polypen optisch charakterisiert und die pathologische Diagnose vorhergesagt werden. Eine Herausforderung stellt aber nach wie vor die Detektion von serratierten Adenomen dar. Diese Polypen kommen vermehrt im rechten Hemikolon vor, dem Ort, an dem die Rate übersehener Adenome am größten ist. Der Sorgfalt des Untersuchers kommt hier eine besondere Bedeutung zu.

Bei der Entfernung von kolorektalen Polypen stehen unterschiedliche Resektionsmethoden zur Verfügung. Ein entscheidendes Kriterium bei der Auswahl der Methode ist die Größe des Polypen. Grundsätzlich ist immer die komplette Resektion anzustreben. Die endoskopische Mukosaresektion ist dafür eine etablierte Methode welche insbesondere ab einer Polypengröße von 6 mm zum Einsatz kommt. Bei sehr großen Polypen des Rektums steht die ESD zur Verfügung, wobei der Einsatz der Methode angesichts der erhöhten Invasivität sorgsam abgewogen werden sollte. Neue Verfahren wie die endoskopische Vollwandresektion sind seit kurzem auch für das Kolon verfügbar. Relevanz und Wertigkeit der Methode werden derzeit aber noch in klinischen Forschungsprojekten geprüft.

Summary

The improved diagnostic possibilities of the past few years have led to a further increase in the detection rate of adenomatous polyps. The establishment of high-resolution video endoscopy was one decisive factor. Further new developments such as the use of larger image windows produced positive results with regard to an increase of the detection rate for adenomas in the first studies. By the use of virtual color techniques colorectal polyps can now be characterized optically and the pathological diagnosis predicted. However, the detection of serrated adenomas remains a challenge. These polyps occur more frequently in the right hemicolon, just that site for which the rate of missed adenomas is the largest. In such cases the diligence of the examiner is of particular importance.

For the removal of colorectal polyps various methods are available. A decisive criterion for the choice of method is the size of the polyps. In general, complete resection is the desired target. Endoscopic mucosal resection is the established method in such cases and is used especially for polyps larger than 6 mm in diameter. In the case of very large rectal polyps ESD is available although use of this method should be carefully assessed in view of its increased invasiveness. New procedures like endoscopic full thickness resection have recently become available for use in the colon. However, the relevance and utility of the method is still being assessed in clinical research projects.

Key words

Colorectal cancer - colonoscopy - endoscopy - adenomatous polyps - video endoscopy - detection rates - neoplasias
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Jansen L et al. Reduced risk of colorectal cancer up to 10 years after screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 2014; 146: 709-717
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Pox CP, Altenhofen L, Brenner H et al. Efficacy of a nationwide screening colonoscopy program for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2012; 142: 1460-1467
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Hassan C, Bretthauer M, Kaminski MF et al. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 142-150
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Schmiegel W, Pox C, Reinacher-Schick A et al. S3 guidelines for colorectal carcinoma: results of an evidence-based consensus conference on February 6/7, 2004 and June 8/9, 2007 (for the topics IV, VI and VII). Z Gastroenterol 2010; 48: 65-136
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O'Brien MJ et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 687-696
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Burke CA, Church JM. Enhancing the quality of colonoscopy: the importance of bowel purgatives. Gastrointestl Endosc 2007; 66: 565-573
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 2533-2541
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Heresbach D, Barrioz T, Lapalus MG et al. Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 284-290
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Rastogi A, Early DS, Gupta N et al. Randomized, controlled trial of standard-definition white-light, high-definition white-light, and narrow-band imaging colonoscopy for the detection of colon polyps and prediction of polyp histology. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 593-602
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Pasha SF, Leighton JA, Das A et al. Comparison of the yield and miss rate of narrow band imaging and white light endoscopy in patients undergoing screening or surveillance colonoscopy: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107: 363-370 quiz 371
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Rahmi G, Lecomte T, Malka D et al. Impact of chromoscopy on adenoma detection in patients with lynch syndrome: a prospective, multicenter, blinded, tandem colonoscopy study. Am J Gastroenterol 2015; 110: 288-298
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Westwood DA, Alexakis N, Connor SJ. Transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy versus standard adult colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 2012; 55: 218-225
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Gralnek IM, Siersema PD, Halpern Z et al. Standard forward-viewing colonoscopy versus full-spectrum endoscopy: an international, multicentre, randomised, tandem colonoscopy trial. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15: 353-360
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Leufkens AM, DeMarco DC, Rastogi A et al. Effect of a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: the TERRACE study. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 480-489
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Uraoka T, Tanaka S, Matsuda T et al. Impact of prototype extra-wide-angle-view colonoscope in the adenoma detection rate: A multicenter randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77 AB 440-440
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Halpern Z, Gross SA, Gralnek IM et al. Comparison of adenoma detection and miss rates between a novel balloon colonoscope and standard colonoscopy: a randomized tandem study. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 238-244
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Rex DK, Adler SN, Aisenberg J et al. Accuracy of Capsule Colonoscopy in Detecting Colorectal Polyps in a Screening Population. Gastroenterology 2015; pii: S0016-5085(15)00110-9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Groth S, Krause H, Behrendt R et al. Capsule colonoscopy increases uptake of colorectal cancer screening. BMC Gastroenterol 2012; 12: 80-80
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Rex DK, Helbig CC. High yields of small and flat adenomas with high-definition colonoscopes using either white light or narrow band imaging. Gastroenterology 2007; 133: 42-47
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Ikematsu H, Saito Y, Tanaka S et al. The impact of narrow band imaging for colon polyp detection: a multicenter randomized controlled trial by tandem colonoscopy. J Gastroenterol 2012; 47: 1099-1107
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Leung WK, Lo OSH, Liu KSH et al. Detection of colorectal adenoma by narrow band imaging (HQ190) vs. high-definition white light colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 109: 855-863
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Hewett DG, Kaltenbach T, Sano Y et al. Validation of a simple classification system for endoscopic diagnosis of small colorectal polyps using narrow-band imaging. Gastroenterology 2012; 143: 599-607
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Kim YS, Kim D, Chung SJ et al. Differentiating small polyp histologies using real-time screening colonoscopy with Fuji Intelligent Color Enhancement. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 9: 744-749
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Adler A, Pohl H, Papanikolaou IS et al. A prospective randomised study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: does narrow-band imaging induce a learning effect?. Gut 2008; 57: 59-64
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Lee CK, Lee S, Hwangbo Y. Narrow-band imaging versus I-Scan for the real-time histological prediction of diminutive colonic polyps: a prospective comparative study by using the simple unified endoscopic classification. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 603-609
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Kuiper T, van den Broek FJC, Naber AH et al. Endoscopic trimodal imaging detects colonic neoplasia as well as standard video endoscopy. Gastroenterology 2011; 140: 1887-1894
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Ignjatovic A, East JE, Guenther T et al. What is the most reliable imaging modality for small colonic polyp characterization? Study of white-light, autofluorescence, and narrow-band imaging. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 94-99
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Sawhney MS, Farrar WD, Gudiseva S et al. Microsatellite instability in interval colon cancers. Gastroenterology 2006; 131: 1700-1705
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Lee CK, Shim J, Jang JY. Cold snare polypectomy vs. Cold forceps polypectomy using double-biopsy technique for removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: a prospective randomized study. Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108: 1593-1600
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Repici A, Hassan C, Vitetta E et al. Safety of cold polypectomy for < 10mm polyps at colonoscopy: a prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 27-31
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Kajiyama M et al. Removal of small colorectal polyps in anticoagulated patients: a prospective randomized comparison of cold snare and conventional polypectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: 417-423
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Conio M, Repici A, Demarquay J et al. EMR of large sessile colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 234-241
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Fujiya M, Tanaka K, Dokoshi T et al. Efficacy and adverse events of EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of colon neoplasms: a meta-analysis of studies comparing EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 583-595
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Moss A, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection outcomes and prediction of submucosal cancer from advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia. Gastroenterology 2011; 140: 1909-1918
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Ishiguro A, Uno Y, Ishiguro Y et al. Correlation of lifting versus non-lifting and microscopic depth of invasion in early colorectal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 50: 329-333
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Kobayashi N, Saito Y, Sano Y et al. Determining the treatment strategy for colorectal neoplastic lesions: endoscopic assessment or the non-lifting sign for diagnosing invasion depth?. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 701-705
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Klare P, Burlefinger R, Neu B et al. Over-the-scope clip-assisted endoscopic full-thickness resection after incomplete resection of a rectal neuroendocrine tumor. Endoscopy 2015; Suppl 1: 47-48
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Schmidt A, Damm M, Caca K. Endoscopic full-thickness resection using a novel over-the-scope device. Gastroenterology 2014; 147: 740-742
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Fahndrich M, Sandmann M. Endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastrointestinal lesions using the over-the-scope clip system: a case series. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 76-79
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Rex DK, Ahnen DJ, Baron JA et al. Serrated lesions of the colorectum: review and recommendations from an expert panel. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107: 1315-1329 quiz 1314, 1330
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar