Eur J Pediatr Surg 2016; 26(04): 357-362
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1556567
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Central Vein Preservation in Critical Venous Access

J. Davidson
1   Department of Paediatric Surgery, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
,
A. Paul
1   Department of Paediatric Surgery, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
,
S. Patel
1   Department of Paediatric Surgery, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
,
M. Davenport
1   Department of Paediatric Surgery, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
,
N. Ade-Ajayi
1   Department of Paediatric Surgery, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

28 January 2015

08 May 2015

Publication Date:
11 August 2015 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Introduction The lack of suitable veins in children with critical central venous access requirements is a major obstacle to optimal care and is potentially life-threatening. We present outcomes following the use of vein-preserving (VP) surgical techniques, notably the sheath exchange for tunneled lines (SETL).

Materials and Methods A retrospective, single observer analysis of a prospectively maintained departmental logbook as well as the medical records of patients. Two broad groups of central line replacements were identified; those inserted following removal of a previous line and a traditional “plastic-free” (PF) period and those exchanged without such an interval.

Results Overall, 19 lines were directly exchanged during the study period and compared with 34 inserted after a PF period. Similar catheter life spans and infection rates were demonstrated in each group; 125 (range, 78–173) days in VP exchanges versus 122 (range, 70–175) days in PF replacements (p = 0.41). Line Sepsis resulting in removal or change of line occurred at 103 (range, 60–147) days in VP group versus 104 (range, 45–164) days in PF (p = 0.73).

Conclusion For children with critical venous access requirements, direct line exchange procedures are a robust and reproducible means of vein preservation. The outcomes compare favorably with those following the more traditional removal, a PF period and reinsertion.