Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 63(08): 706-714
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1556873
Original Thoracic
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

The Munich Lung Transplant Group: Intraoperative Extracorporeal Circulation in Lung Transplantation

Dominik J. Hoechter
1   Department of Anesthesiology, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
*   Both the authors contributed equally to this work.
,
Vera von Dossow
1   Department of Anesthesiology, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
*   Both the authors contributed equally to this work.
,
Hauke Winter
2   Department of General, Visceral, Transplant, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
,
Hans-Helge Müller
3   University of Marburg, Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, Germany
,
Bruno Meiser
4   Transplantation Center, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
,
Claus Neurohr
5   Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
,
Juergen Behr
5   Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
,
Sabina Guenther
6   Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
,
Christian Hagl
6   Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
,
René Schramm
4   Transplantation Center, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
6   Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

24. März 2015

13. Mai 2015

Publikationsdatum:
20. August 2015 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Background This retrospective single-center study aimed to analyze transfusion requirements, coagulation parameters, and outcome parameters in patients undergoing lung transplantation (LuTx) with intraoperative extracorporeal circulatory support, comparing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).

Methods Over a 3-year period, 49 of a total of 188 LuTx recipients were identified being set intraoperatively on either conventional CPB (n = 22) or ECMO (n = 27). Intra- and postoperative transfusion and coagulation factor requirements as well as early outcome parameters were analyzed.

Results LuTx patients on CPB had significantly higher intraoperative transfusion requirements when compared with ECMO patients, that is, packed red cells (9 units [5–18] vs. 6 units [4–8], p = 0.011), platelets (3.5 units [2–4] vs. 2 units [0–3], p = 0.034), fibrinogen (5 g [4–6] vs. 0 g [0–4], p = 0.013), prothrombin complex concentrate (3 iU [2–5] vs. 0 iU [0–2], p = 0.001), and tranexamic acid (2.5 mg [2–5] vs. 2.0 mg [1–3], p = 0.002). Also, ventilator support requirements (21days [7–31] vs. 5 days [3–21], p = 0.013) and lengths of ICU stays (36 days [14–62] vs. 15 days [6–44], p = 0.030) were markedly longer in CPB patients. There were no differences in 30-day and 1-year mortality rates.

Conclusion These data indicate a perioperative advantage of ECMO usage with low-dose heparinization over conventional CPB for extracorporeal circulatory support during LuTx. Long-term outcome is not affected.

Authors' Contribution

D. J. Hoechter and V. von Dossow contributed equally in pre-, intra-, and postoperative patient treatment; designing the study protocol; conducting the analyses, the collection, and interpretation of data; and preparation and revision of the manuscript.


H. W., B. M., C. N., J. B., S. G., C. H., and R. S. participated in pre-, intra-, and postoperative patient treatment; data interpretation and preparation; and revision of the manuscript. H.-H. M. performed the statistical analyses, data interpretation, and revision of the manuscript. R. S. designed the study protocol.


J. B. is a member of the German Center for Lung Research.