J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2016; 77(01): 024-031
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1556875
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

A Quantitative Analysis of Published Skull Base Endoscopy Literature

Douglas A. Hardesty
1   Division of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona
,
Francisco A. Ponce
1   Division of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona
,
Andrew S. Little
1   Division of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona
,
Peter Nakaji
1   Division of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

27 March 2015

28 May 2015

Publication Date:
03 August 2015 (online)

Abstract

Objectives Skull base endoscopy allows for minimal access approaches to the sinonasal contents and cranial base. Advances in endoscopic technique and applications have been published rapidly in recent decades.

Setting We utilized an Internet-based scholarly database (Web of Science, Thomson Reuters) to query broad-based phrases regarding skull base endoscopy literature.

Participants All skull base endoscopy publications.

Main Outcome Measures Standard bibliometrics outcomes.

Results We identified 4,082 relevant skull base endoscopy English-language articles published between 1973 and 2014. The 50 top-cited publications (n = 51, due to articles with equal citation counts) ranged in citation count from 397 to 88. Most of the articles were clinical case series or technique descriptions. Most (96% [49/51])were published in journals specific to either neurosurgery or otolaryngology.

Conclusions A relatively small number of institutions and individuals have published a large amount of the literature. Most of the publications consisted of case series and technical advances, with a lack of randomized trials.