Challenging the Dogma of Tourniquet Pressure Requirements for Upper Extremity Surgery

Abstract

Background Traditional teaching supports upper extremity tourniquet pressure to be set at 250 mm Hg. Complications have been associated with increased pressure and duration of tourniquet use. We hypothesized that there will be no significant difference in intraoperative variables between tourniquet pressures of 125, 150, 175, or 200 mm Hg as compared with the current practice of 250 mm Hg during mini-open carpal tunnel release.

Case Description A retrospective review was conducted of patients undergoing open carpal tunnel release from June 2009 to June 2012. Those undergoing surgery with a tourniquet pressure of 250 mm Hg were compared with those with lower tourniquet pressures regarding their demographics, operative and anesthesia time, and whether the tourniquet pressure needed to be increased to 250 mm Hg during surgery.

Literature Review A total of 432 patients underwent carpal tunnel release over the 3-year period. There were no differences with respect to patient demographics. There was no significant difference between operative or anesthesia time between different tourniquet pressure groups. There were no reported problems with breakthrough bleeding or difficulty with visualization of structures in any of the pressure groups. None of the patients with lower tourniquet pressures needed the tourniquet pressure to be adjusted during surgery.

Clinical Relevance This study demonstrated that using lower tourniquet pressures had no effect on the operation for open carpal tunnel release including effect on operative or anesthesia time, breakthrough bleeding, or complications directly related to tourniquet pressures. Orthopedic surgeons may consider reducing tourniquet pressures during carpal tunnel release.

Keywords

pneumatic tourniquets - tourniquet pressure - upper extremity surgery - carpal tunnel release

Note

This study was approved by institutional review board (number: 13–000840).

• References

• 1 Estebe JP, Davies JM, Richebe P. The pneumatic tourniquet: mechanical, ischaemia-reperfusion and systemic effects. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2011; 28 (6) 404-411
• 2 Oragui E, Parsons A, White T, Longo UG, Khan WS. Tourniquet use in upper limb surgery. Hand (NY) 2011; 6 (2) 165-173
• 3 Wakai A, Winter DC, Street JT, Redmond PH. Pneumatic tourniquets in extremity surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2001; 9 (5) 345-351
• 4 Sharma JP, Salhotra R. Tourniquets in orthopedic surgery. Indian J Orthop 2012; 46 (4) 377-383
• 5 Pedowitz RA, Rydevik BL, Gershuni DH, Hargens AR. An animal model for the study of neuromuscular injury induced beneath and distal to a pneumatic tourniquet. J Orthop Res 1990; 8 (6) 899-908
• 6 Pedowitz RA, Gershuni DH, Schmidt AH, Fridén J, Rydevik BL, Hargens AR. Muscle injury induced beneath and distal to a pneumatic tourniquet: a quantitative animal study of effects of tourniquet pressure and duration. J Hand Surg Am 1991; 16 (4) 610-621
• 7 Gilliatt RW, Ochoa J, Rudge P, Neary D. The cause of nerve damage in acute compression. Trans Am Neurol Assoc 1974; 99: 71-74
• 8 Malanjum L, Fischer B. Procedure under tourniquet. Anaesth Intensive Care Med. 2009; 10: 14-17
• 9 McEwen JA, Inkpen K, Younger A. Thigh tourniquet safety: LOP measurement and a wide contoured cuff allows lower cuff pressure. Surg Technol 2002; 34: 8-18
• 10 Levy O, David Y, Heim M, Eldar I, Chetrit A, Engel J. Minimal tourniquet pressure to maintain arterial closure in upper limb surgery. J Hand Surg [Br] 1993; 18 (2) 204-206
• 11 Tuncali B, Karci A, Tuncali BE , et al. A new method for estimating arterial occlusion pressure in optimizing pneumatic tourniquet inflation pressure. Anesth Analg 2006; 102 (6) 1752-1757
• 12 Prasetyono TO, Biben JA. One-per-mil tumescent technique for upper extremity surgeries: broadening the indication. J Hand Surg Am 2014; 39 (1) 3-12.e7
• 13 Prasetyono TO. Tourniquet-free hand surgery using the one-per-mil tumescent technique. Arch Plast Surg 2013; 40 (2) 129-133