Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017; 65(05): 362-366
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1583766
Original Thoracic
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Comparison of Conductive and Convective Warming in Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

Alexander Emmert
1   Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Medical Center, Georg-August University, Goettingen, Germany
,
Robert Franke
1   Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Medical Center, Georg-August University, Goettingen, Germany
,
Ivo Florian Brandes
2   Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center, Georg-August University,Goettingen, Germany
,
Marc Hinterthaner
1   Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Medical Center, Georg-August University, Goettingen, Germany
,
Bernhard C. Danner
1   Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Medical Center, Georg-August University, Goettingen, Germany
,
Martin Bauer
2   Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center, Georg-August University,Goettingen, Germany
,
Anselm Bräuer
2   Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center, Georg-August University,Goettingen, Germany
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

05. Januar 2016

03. April 2016

Publikationsdatum:
13. Mai 2016 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Background Perioperative hypothermia is frequent during thoracic surgery. After approval by the local ethics committee and written informed consent from patients, we examined the efficiency of prewarming and intraoperative warming with a convective warming system and conductive warming system to prevent perioperative hypothermia during video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS).

Methods We randomized 60 patients with indication for VATS in two groups (convective warming with an underbody blanket vs. conductive warming with an underbody mattress and additional warming of the legs). All patients were prewarmed before induction of anesthesia with the corresponding system. Core temperature was measured sublingual and in the nasopharynx.

Results Both groups were not significantly different in regard to clinical parameter, prewarming, and initial core temperature. The patients in conduction group had lower intraoperative core temperatures and a higher incidence of intraoperative (73.9 vs. 24%) and postoperative hypothermia (56.5 vs. 8%) compared with convective warming.

Conclusions Pre- and intraoperative convective warming with an underbody blanket prevents perioperative hypothermia during VATS better than conductive warming. The inferior prevention in conductive warming group may be caused by reduced body contact to the warming mattresses in lateral position.