Synlett, Inhaltsverzeichnis Synlett 2018; 29(10): 1351-1357DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1591563 letter © Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York First Total Synthesis of Oxirapentyn D, a Highly Oxidized Chromene Natural Product Takahiro Sakai Department of Chemistry, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1 O-okayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8551, Japan eMail: kohmori@chem.titech.ac.jp , Keisuke Suzuki Department of Chemistry, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1 O-okayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8551, Japan eMail: kohmori@chem.titech.ac.jp , Ken Ohmori * Department of Chemistry, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1 O-okayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8551, Japan eMail: kohmori@chem.titech.ac.jp › Institutsangaben Artikel empfehlen Abstract Artikel einzeln kaufen Alle Artikel dieser Rubrik Dedicated to Prof. Victor Snieckus on occasion of his 80th birthday Abstract The first total synthesis of oxirapentyn D from myo-inositol has been achieved by utilizing chelation-directed bridgehead lithiation of a hydrazone derivative. Key words Key wordsnatural product synthesis - meroterpenoids - hydrazones - bridgehead functionalization - epoxidation - total synthesis Volltext Referenzen References and Notes 1a Takahashi S. Itoh Y. Takeuchi M. Furuya K. Kodama K. Naito A. Haneishi T. Sato S. Tamura C. J. Antibiot. 1983; 36: 1418 1b Smetanina OF. Yurchenko AN. Afiyatullov SS. Kalinovsky AI. Pushilin MA. Khudyakova YV. Slinkina NN. Ermakova SP. Yurchenko EA. Phytochem. Lett. 2012; 5: 165 1c Yurchenko AN. Smetanina OF. Khudyakova YV. Kirichuk NN. Chaikina EL. Anisimov MM. Afiyatullov SS. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2013; 49: 857 1d Yurchenko AN. Smetanina OF. Kalinovsky AI. Pushilin MA. Glazunov VP. Khudyakova YV. Kirichuk NN. Ermakova SP. Dyshlovoy SA. Yurchenko EA. Afiyatullov SS. J. Nat. Prod. 2014; 77: 1321 2a Geris R. Simpson TJ. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2009; 26: 1063 2b Matsuda Y. Abe I. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2016; 33: 26 3a Lee HW. Kishi Y. J. Org. Chem. 1985; 50: 4402 3b Garret SW. Liu C. Riley AM. Potter BV. L. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1998; 1367 3c Sureshan KM. Devaraj S. Shashidhar MS. Tetrahedron 2009; 65: 2703 4 Referred to the numbering of the natural product. 5a Wrobel J. Takahashi K. Honkan V. Lannoye G. Cook JM. Bertz SH. J. Org. Chem. 1983; 48: 139 5b Shiner CS. Berks AH. Fisher AM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988; 110: 957 5c Blake AJ. Giblin GM. P. Kirk DT. Simpkins NS. Wilson C. Chem. Commun. 2001; 2668 5d Hayes CJ. Simpkins NS. Kirk DT. Mitchell L. Baudoux J. Blake AJ. Wilson C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009; 131: 8196 5e Siegel DR. Danishefsky SJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006; 128: 1048 5f Rodeschini V. Simpkins NS. Wilson C. J. Org. Chem. 2007; 72: 4265 5g Uwamori M. Saito A. Nakada M. J. Org. Chem. 2012; 77: 5098 5h Sparling BA. Moebius DC. Shair MD. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013; 135: 644 6a Snieckus V. Chem. Rev. 1990; 90: 879 6b Hartung CG. Snieckus V. In: Modern Arene Chemistry: Concepts, Synthesis, and Applications . Astruc D. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2002. Chap. 10 330 6c Whisler MC. MacNeil S. Snieckus V. Beak P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004; 43: 2206 7 The remaining proton in 7 is less acidic due to the hydrogen bonding of the axial hydroxy group to the axial siloxy group; consequently, the oxonium cation was not deprotonated and therefore not silylated. 8 Upon treatment of the MEM-protected precursor with LDA, aldol products were obtained as mixtures of regioisomers and/or diastereomers; see Supporting Information. 9a Corey EJ. Enders D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1976; 17: 3 9b Corey EJ. Enders D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1976; 17: 11 9c Corey EJ. Enders D. Chem. Ber. 1978; 111: 1362 9d Enders D. Eichenauer H. Angew. Chem. 1976; 88: 579 ; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1976, 15, 549 For the use of a bicyclic hydrazone as a bridgehead anion precursor, see: 9e Shiina Y. Tomata Y. Miyashita M. Tanino K. Chem. Lett. 2010; 39: 835 10 The geometry of the hydrazone was determined from the chemical shifts of its α-protons and extensive NMR analysis (NOE); see Supporting Information. The ratio of isomers fluctuated from 9a/9b =2:1 to 10:1. 11 A 5:1 mixture of isomers 9a and 9b was used for the experiments listed in Table 2. 12a Ellefson CR. J. Org. Chem. 1979; 44: 1533 12b Sibi MP. Miah MA. J. Snieckus V. J. Org. Chem. 1984; 49: 737 12c Sibi MP. Chattopadhyay S. Dankwardt JW. Snieckus V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985; 107: 6312 12d Hartman GD. Halczenko W. Phillips BT. J. Org. Chem. 1985; 50: 2427 13 The structure of 10 was determined by extensive NMR analysis (NOESY, and HMBC). See Supporting Information. 14 For the isomerization of hydrazones, see: Jung ME. Shaw TJ. Tetrahedron Lett. 1977; 18: 3305 15 For the chelating effect in the deprotonation of imine, see: Liao S. Collum DB. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003; 125: 15114 16 Porath B. Rademacher P. Boese R. Bläser D. Z. Naturforsch., B 2002; 57: 365 17 The geometries of hydrazones 11 and 12 were determined by extensive NMR analysis (NOESY); see the Supporting Information. 18 Additionally, the starting material 12 and a regioisomer were each obtained in a 5% yield; see the Supporting Information. 19 1H NMR analysis suggested the methylation occurred selectively at the amino nitrogen of the hydrazone, not at the imino nitrogen, judging from a 6 H singlet for the methyl groups; see Supporting Information. 20 The structure of ketone 14 was determined by 1H and 13C NMR analyses. 21 The equatorial orientation of the C2 iodine atom was assigned by 1H NMR. The J-values between the C2 methine and the C3 methylene protons were 4.4 and 13.1 Hz, respectively, the latter indicating an antiperiplanar relationship of the H2 and H3α protons. 22a Ochiai M. In Hypervalent Iodine Chemistry: Modern Developments in Organic Synthesis. Wirth T. Springer; Berlin: 2003. Chap. 1 5 22b Yoshimura A. Zhdankin VV. Chem. Rev. 2016; 116: 3328 23 Zhu C. Zhang Y. Zhao H. Huang S. Zhang M. Su W. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2015; 357: 331 24 The structure of acetate 17 was determined by extensive NMR analysis (NOE and HMBC); see the Supporting Information. 25 Singh FV. Wirth T. Synthesis 2013; 45: 2499 26 mCPBA and basic Oxone gave epoxide 18 and its diastereomer. DMDO afforded no reaction. 27a Sharpless KB. Michaelson RC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973; 95: 6136 27b Mihelich ED. Daniels K. Eickhoff DJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981; 103: 7690 For an example of vanadium mediated stereoselective epoxidation of bishomoallyl alcohol, see 27c Fukuyama T. Vranesic B. Negri DP. Kishi Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1978; 19: 2741 28a Stork G. Cohen JF. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974; 96: 5270 28b Baldwin JE. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1976; 734 29a Dyatkin BL. Mochalina EP. Knunyants IL. Tetrahedron 1965; 21: 2991 29b Bégué J.-P. Bonnet-Delpon D. Crousse B. Synlett 2004; 18 29c Shuklov IA. Dubrovina NV. Börner A. Synthesis 2007; 2925 30 HFIP afforded the best result among several fluorinated alcohols [F3CCH2OH, (F3C)3COH, and PhC(CF3)2OH]. 31 The stereochemistry of the C2 hydroxy group was assigned by comparing the H2–H3 coupling constant of 19 with that of its C2 epimer (obtained by oxidation of triol 5 with Oxone; see Supporting Information). The C2 epimer of 19 showed a large coupling constant (J = 11.7 Hz), indicating an equatorial disposition of the C2 hydroxy group. Further support was obtained from the downfield shift of the 2-OH proton of 19 (δ = 3.3), which suggested the presence of hydrogen bonding between the axial hydroxy group and the orthoester oxygen. 32 The structures of 4 and 4′ were determined by 1H and 13C NMR, and by extensive NMR analysis (HMBC): see the Supporting Information. 33 TLC analysis showed that the reaction stopped without obvious reason. There are two conceivable explanations for this. The first is that the oxidant interacted with product 4 or 4′. To examine this possibility, we studied the reverse addition of the alcohol 19 and found that the yield of 4 + 4′ decreased (14%; recovery: 60%). The second is that deprotonation of an adduct of the alcohol and the oxidant was slow. However, addition of base (pyridine) was not effective (4+ 4′: 38%, recovery: 9%). 34 Oxirapentyn D (1) by Nucleophilic Addition of Acetylide 21 to Ketone 4 An equilibrium mixture of ketone 4 and its hydrate 4′ (4.9 mg, 0.017 mmol) was azeotropically dried with toluene and dissolved in THF (0.34 mL). A 0.20 M solution of acetylide 21 in THF (0.43 mL, 0.086 mmol) was added at –78 °C, and the mixture was stirred for 2 h at –78 °C. The reaction was stopped by the addition of sat. aq NH4Cl, and the mixture was extracted with EtOAc (×3). The combined organic extracts were washed with brine, dried (Na2SO4), and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by flash column chromatography [silica gel, hexane–EtOAc (1:1)] to give a white solid; yield: 3.2 mg (53%); mp 213–217 °C (EtOAc–hexane); Rf = 0.57 (hexane–EtOAc, 1:5). IR (neat): 3472, 2955, 2925, 2853, 2226, 1615, 1434, 1402, 1296, 1230, 1176, 1138, 1080, 999, 948, 905, 853, 827 cm–1. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.30 (s, 3 H), 1.39 (s, 3 H), 1.51 (s, 3 H), 1.78 (dd, J = 15.1, 2.4 Hz, 1 H), 1.91 (t, J = 1.1 Hz, 3 H), 2.52 (dd, J = 15.1, 3.6 Hz, 1 H), 3.16 (s, 1 H, OH), 3.32 (d, J = 11.6 Hz, 1 H, OH), 3.46 (ddd, J = 11.6, 3.6, 2.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.60 (d, J = 9.7 Hz, 1 H, OH), 4.02 (dd, J = 9.7, 3.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.12 (d, J = 1.7 Hz, 1 H), 4.18 (dd, J = 3.4, 1.9 Hz, 1 H), 4.19–4.20 (m, 1 H), 5.33 (quint, J = 1.6 Hz, 1 H), 5.38–5.39 (m, 1 H). 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 21.9, 23.1, 24.4, 26.3, 31.4, 60.1, 68.6, 70.8, 71.0, 72.7, 73.9, 75.8, 76.5, 86.8, 87.7, 108.8, 123.9, 125.5. HRMS (ESI-TOF): m/z [M + Na]+ calcd for C18H24NaO7: 375.1414; found: 375.1398. UV (MeCN, 6.81 × 10–5 M): λmax (log ε) = 221 (3.47), 228 (3.41) nm. 35 The stereoselectivity is rationalized by the precoordination of alkynyl lithium species with the oxygen-rich functionality on the trioxaadamantane skeleton. 36 CCDC 1581357 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for compound 1. The data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/getstructures. Zusatzmaterial Zusatzmaterial Supporting Information