Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1597755
What Arthroscopic Skills Need to Be Trained Before Continuing Safe Training in the Operating Room?
Publication History
17 February 2016
16 November 2016
Publication Date:
12 January 2017 (online)
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to generate consensus among experienced surgeons on “what skills a resident should possess before continuing safe training in the operating room (OR).” An online survey of 65 questions was developed and distributed to surgeons in the European community. A total of 216 responded. The survey included 15 questions regarding generic and specific skills; 16 on patient and tissue manipulation, 11 on knowledge of pathology and 6 on inspection of e-anatomical structures; 5 methods to prepare residents; and 12 on specific skills exercises. The importance of each question (arthroscopic skill) was evaluated ranging from 1 (not important at all) to 6 (very important). Chi-square test, respondent agreement, and a qualitative ranking method were determined to identify the top ranked skills (p < 0.05). The top four of general skills considered important were “anatomical knowledge,” “tissue manipulation,” “spatial perception,” and “triangulation” (all chi-square test > 134, p < 0.001, all excellent agreement > 0.85, and all “high priority” level). The top ranked 2 specific arthroscopic skills were “portal placement” and “triangulating the tip of the probe with a 30-degree scope” (chi-square test > 176, p < 0.001, excellent agreement, and assigned high priority). The online survey identified consensus on skills that are considered important for a trainee to possess before continuing training in the OR. Compared with the Canadian colleagues, the European arthroscopy community demonstrated similar ranking.
-
References
- 1 Cullen KA, Hall MJ, Golosinskiy A. Ambulatory surgery in the United States, 2006. Natl Health Stat Rep 2009; 11 (11) 1-25
- 2 Garrett Jr WE, Swiontkowski MF, Weinstein JN. , et al. American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Practice of the Orthopaedic Surgeon: Part-II, certification examination case mix. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88 (03) 660-667
- 3 Georgoulis A, Randelli P. Education in arthroscopy, sports medicine and knee surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19 (08) 1231-1232
- 4 Grechenig W, Fellinger M, Fankhauser F, Weiglein AH. The Graz learning and training model for arthroscopic surgery. Surg Radiol Anat 1999; 21 (05) 347-350
- 5 Allum R. Complications of arthroscopy of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002; 84 (07) 937-945
- 6 Hanna GB, Shimi SM, Cuschieri A. Randomised study of influence of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging on performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Lancet 1998; 351 (9098): 248-251
- 7 Karam MD, Pedowitz RA, Natividad H, Murray J, Marsh JL. Current and future use of surgical skills training laboratories in orthopaedic resident education: a national survey. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95 (01) e4
- 8 Frank RM, Erickson B, Frank JM. , et al. Utility of modern arthroscopic simulator training models. Arthroscopy 2014; 30 (01) 121-133
- 9 Madan SS, Pai DR. Role of simulation in arthroscopy training. Simul Healthc 2014; 9 (02) 127-135
- 10 Safir O, Dubrowski A, Mirsky L, Lin C, Backstein D, Carnahan A. What skills should simulation training in arthroscopy teach residents?. Int J CARS 2008; 3: 433-437
- 11 Hui Y, Safir O, Dubrowski A, Carnahan H. What skills should simulation training in arthroscopy teach residents? A focus on resident input. Int J CARS 2013; 8 (06) 945-953
- 12 Cabitza F, Ragone V, Arrigoni P, Karlsson J, Randelli P. Management of knee injuries: consensus-based indications from a large community of orthopaedic surgeons. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013; 21 (03) 708-719
- 13 Obdeijn MC, Bavinck N, Mathoulin C, van der Horst CM, Schijven MP, Tuijthof GJ. Education in wrist arthroscopy: past, present and future. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23 (05) 1337-1345
- 14 Tuijthof GJ, Visser P, Sierevelt IN, Van Dijk CN, Kerkhoffs GM. Does perception of usefulness of arthroscopic simulators differ with levels of experience?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469 (06) 1701-1708
- 15 Verdaasdonk EG, Stassen LP, Schijven MP, Dankelman J. Construct validity and assessment of the learning curve for the SIMENDO endoscopic simulator. Surg Endosc 2007; 21 (08) 1406-1412
- 16 Hurmusiadis V, Rhode K, Schaeffter T, Sherman K. Virtual arthroscopy trainer for minimally invasive surgery. Stud Health Technol Inform 2011; 163: 236-238
- 17 Chami G, Ward JW, Phillips R, Sherman KP. Haptic feedback can provide an objective assessment of arthroscopic skills. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 466 (04) 963-968
- 18 Moody L, Waterworth A, McCarthy AD, Harley P, Smallwood R. The feasibility of a mixed reality surgical training environment. Virtual Real (Walth Cross) 2008; 12: 77-86
- 19 Fucentese SF, Rahm S, Wieser K, Spillmann J, Harders M, Koch PP. Evaluation of a virtual-reality-based simulator using passive haptic feedback for knee arthroscopy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23 (04) 1077-1085
- 20 Obdeijn MC, Horeman T, de Boer LL, van Baalen SJ, Liverneaux P, Tuijthof GJ. Navigation forces during wrist arthroscopy: assessment of expert levels. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24 (11) 3684-3692
- 21 Tuijthof GJ, Horeman T, Schafroth MU, Blankevoort L, Kerkhoffs GM. Probing forces of menisci: what levels are safe for arthroscopic surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19 (02) 248-254
- 22 O'Neill PJ, Cosgarea AJ, Freedman JA, Queale WS, McFarland EG. Arthroscopic proficiency: a survey of orthopaedic sports medicine fellowship directors and orthopaedic surgery department chairs. Arthroscopy 2002; 18 (07) 795-800
- 23 Modi CS, Morris G, Mukherjee R. Computer-simulation training for knee and shoulder arthroscopic surgery. Arthroscopy 2010; 26 (06) 832-840