J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2017; 78(03): 245-250
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1597925
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Phantosmia and Dysgeusia following Endoscopic Transcribriform Approaches to Olfactory Groove Meningiomas

Andrew S. Venteicher*
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
,
Jay I. Kumar*
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
,
Emma A. Murphy
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
,
Stacey T. Gray
2   Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
,
Eric H. Holbrook
2   Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
,
William T. Curry
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

20 August 2016

29 November 2016

Publication Date:
18 January 2017 (online)

Abstract

The endoscopic, endonasal transcribriform approach (EETA) is an important technique used to directly access the anterior skull base and is increasingly being used in the management of olfactory groove meningiomas (OGMs). As this approach requires removal of the cribriform plate and olfactory epithelium en route to the tumor, patients are anosmic postoperatively. Here, we report the development of phantosmia and dysgeusia in two patients who underwent EETAs for OGMs, which has not yet been reported in the literature. We hypothesize that phantosmia and dysgeusia may result from aberrant neuronal signals or misinterpretation centrally from the remaining distal portions of the olfactory and taste pathways. Since EETAs are newer than traditional open craniotomy-based techniques, reporting these outcomes will be important to appropriately counsel patients preoperatively.

* Co-first authors.


 
  • References

  • 1 Bakay L. Olfactory meningiomas. The missed diagnosis. JAMA 1984; 251 (01) 53-55
  • 2 Hentschel SJ, DeMonte F. Olfactory groove meningiomas. Neurosurg Focus 2003; 14 (06) e4
  • 3 Zygourakis CC, Sughrue ME, Benet A, Parsa AT, Berger MS, McDermott MW. Management of planum/olfactory meningiomas: predicting symptoms and postoperative complications. World Neurosurg 2014; 82 (06) 1216-1223
  • 4 Nakamura M, Struck M, Roser F, Vorkapic P, Samii M. Olfactory groove meningiomas: clinical outcome and recurrence rates after tumor removal through the frontolateral and bifrontal approach. Neurosurgery 2008; 62 (06) , (suppl 3) 1224-1232
  • 5 Bitter AD, Stavrinou LC, Ntoulias G. , et al. The Role of the pterional approach in the surgical treatment of olfactory groove meningiomas: a 20-year experience. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2013; 74 (02) 97-102
  • 6 Pallini R, Fernandez E, Lauretti L. , et al. Olfactory groove meningioma: report of 99 cases surgically treated at the Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome. World Neurosurg 2015; 83 (02) 219-31.e1 , 3
  • 7 Liu JK, Hattar E, Eloy JA. Endoscopic endonasal approach for olfactory groove meningiomas: operative technique and nuances. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2015; 26 (03) 377-388
  • 8 Greenfield JP, Anand VK, Kacker A. , et al. Endoscopic endonasal transethmoidal transcribriform transfovea ethmoidalis approach to the anterior cranial fossa and skull base. Neurosurgery 2010; 66 (05) 883-892 , discussion 892
  • 9 Gardner PA, Kassam AB, Thomas A. , et al. Endoscopic endonasal resection of anterior cranial base meningiomas. Neurosurgery 2008; 63 (01) 36-52 , discussion 52–54
  • 10 Komotar RJ, Starke RM, Raper DM, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. Endoscopic endonasal versus open transcranial resection of anterior midline skull base meningiomas. World Neurosurg 2012; 77 (5-6): 713-724
  • 11 Khan OH, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. Endoscopic endonasal resection of skull base meningiomas: the significance of a “cortical cuff” and brain edema compared with careful case selection and surgical experience in predicting morbidity and extent of resection. Neurosurg Focus 2014; 37 (04) E7
  • 12 Estrem SA, Renner G. Disorders of smell and taste. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1987; 20 (01) 133-147
  • 13 Davidson TM, Jalowayski A, Murphy C, Jacobs RD. Evaluation and treatment of smell dysfunction. West J Med 1987; 146 (04) 434-438
  • 14 Jang WY, Jung S, Jung TY, Moon KS, Kim IY. Preservation of olfaction in surgery of olfactory groove meningiomas. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2013; 115 (08) 1288-1292
  • 15 Graffeo CS, Dietrich AR, Grobelny B. , et al. A panoramic view of the skull base: systematic review of open and endoscopic endonasal approaches to four tumors. Pituitary 2014; 17 (04) 349-356
  • 16 Hadley K, Orlandi RR, Fong KJ. Basic anatomy and physiology of olfaction and taste. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2004; 37 (06) 1115-1126
  • 17 Feng P, Huang L, Wang H. Taste bud homeostasis in health, disease, and aging. Chem Senses 2014; 39 (01) 3-16
  • 18 Deems DA, Doty RL, Settle RG. , et al. Smell and taste disorders, a study of 750 patients from the University of Pennsylvania Smell and Taste Center. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991; 117 (05) 519-528
  • 19 Bushdid C, Magnasco MO, Vosshall LB, Keller A. Humans can discriminate more than 1 trillion olfactory stimuli. Science 2014; 343 (6177): 1370-1372
  • 20 Hasan KS, Reddy SS, Barsony N. Taste perception in kallmann syndrome, a model of congenital anosmia. Endocr Pract 2007; 13 (07) 716-720
  • 21 Hong SC, Holbrook EH, Leopold DA, Hummel T. Distorted olfactory perception: a systematic review. Acta Otolaryngol 2012; 132 (Suppl 1): S27-S31
  • 22 Miwa T, Furukawa M, Tsukatani T, Costanzo RM, DiNardo LJ, Reiter ER. Impact of olfactory impairment on quality of life and disability. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001; 127 (05) 497-503
  • 23 Croy I, Nordin S, Hummel T. Olfactory disorders and quality of life--an updated review. Chem Senses 2014; 39 (03) 185-194
  • 24 Henkin RI, Levy LM, Fordyce A. Taste and smell function in chronic disease: a review of clinical and biochemical evaluations of taste and smell dysfunction in over 5000 patients at The Taste and Smell Clinic in Washington, DC. Am J Otolaryngol 2013; 34 (05) 477-489
  • 25 Pence TS, Reiter ER, DiNardo LJ, Costanzo RM. Risk factors for hazardous events in olfactory-impaired patients. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014; 140 (10) 951-955
  • 26 Henkin RI, Hoye RC. Hyposmia secondary to excision of the olfactory epithelium. The definition of primary and accessory areas of olfaction. Life Sci 1966; 5 (04) 331-341
  • 27 Hoye RC, Ketcham AS, Henkin RI. Hyposmia after paranasal sinus exenteration of laryngectomy. Am J Surg 1970; 120 (04) 485-491
  • 28 Henkin RI, Levy LM, Lin CS. Taste and smell phantoms revealed by brain functional MRI (fMRI). J Comput Assist Tomogr 2000; 24 (01) 106-123
  • 29 Levy LM, Henkin RI. Physiologically initiated and inhibited phantosmia: cyclic unirhinal, episodic, recurrent phantosmia revealed by brain fMRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2000; 24 (04) 501-520
  • 30 Henkin RI, Potolicchio SJ, Levy LM. Olfactory hallucinations without clinical motor activity: a comparison of unirhinal with birhinal phantosmia. Brain Sci 2013; 3 (04) 1483-1553
  • 31 Levy LM, Henkin RI. Brain gamma-aminobutyric acid levels are decreased in patients with phantageusia and phantosmia demonstrated by magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004; 28 (06) 721-727
  • 32 Heckmann SM, Hujoel P, Habiger S. , et al. Zinc gluconate in the treatment of dysgeusia--a randomized clinical trial. J Dent Res 2005; 84 (01) 35-38
  • 33 Deems DA, Yen DM, Kreshak A, Doty RL. Spontaneous resolution of dysgeusia. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996; 122 (09) 961-963
  • 34 Makler V, Litofsky NS. Successful treatment of dysgeusia after middle-ear surgery with amitriptyline: case report. Am J Otolaryngol 2015; 36 (03) 456-459
  • 35 Leopold DA, Schwob JE, Youngentob SL, Hornung DE, Wright HN, Mozell MM. Successful treatment of phantosmia with preservation of olfaction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991; 117 (12) 1402-1406
  • 36 Leopold DA, Loehrl TA, Schwob JE. Long-term follow-up of surgically treated phantosmia. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002; 128 (06) 642-647
  • 37 Barker KE, Batstone MD, Savage NW. Comparison of treatment modalities in burning mouth syndrome. Aust Dent J 2009; 54 (04) 300-305 , quiz
  • 38 Henkin RI, Potolicchio Jr SJ, Levy LM. Improvement in smell and taste dysfunction after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Am J Otolaryngol 2011; 32 (01) 38-46
  • 39 Silas J, Atif MA, Doty RL. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a treatment for smell and taste dysfunction. Am J Otolaryngol 2011; 32 (02) 177 , author reply 178–180