Subscribe to RSS
Please copy the URL and add it into your RSS Feed Reader.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/en/10.1055-s-00000018.xml
Facial Plast Surg 2017; 33(03): 271-278
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1598073
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1598073
Original Article
The Difficult Neck in Facelifting
Further Information
Publication History
Publication Date:
01 June 2017 (online)
Abstract
As the popularity and acceptance of facial and cervical rejuvenation procedures grows, surgeons are increasingly encountering patients with less favorable anatomical characteristics for rhytidectomy. These patients will typically display an obtuse cervicomental angle, underprojected chin, excess cervical adiposity, and platysmal banding, in addition to ptotic submandibular glands, tenacious jowls, and prejowl volume deficits. Recognition of these problems and the correct application of available techniques to address the difficult neck in facelifting are critical in maximizing success.
-
References
- 1 Adamson PA, Litner JA. Surgical management of the aging neck. Facial Plast Surg 2005; 21 (01) 11-20
- 2 Fedok FG, Chaikhoutdinov I, Garritano F. The difficult neck in facelifting. Facial Plast Surg 2014; 30 (04) 438-450
- 3 Reece EM, Rohrich RJ. The aesthetic jaw line: management of the aging jowl. Aesthet Surg J 2008; 28 (06) 668-674
- 4 de Castro CC. The anatomy of the platysma muscle. Plast Reconstr Surg 1980; 66 (05) 680-683
- 5 Perkins SW, Waters HH. The extended SMAS approach to neck rejuvenation. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2014; 22 (02) 253-268
- 6 Daane SP, Owsley JQ. Incidence of cervical branch injury with “marginal mandibular nerve pseudo-paralysis” in patients undergoing face lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 111 (07) 2414-2418
- 7 Guyuron B, Jackowe D, Iamphongsai S. Basket submandibular gland suspension. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (03) 938-943