Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1599114
Self-Assessment Questions
Publication History
Publication Date:
21 March 2017 (online)
This section provides a review. Mark each statement on the Answer Sheet according to the factual materials contained in this issue and the opinions of the authors.
Article One (pp. 77–86)
-
A synergy is
-
part of the microbiome
-
a close relationship between mother and child during feeding
-
a functional grouping of muscles and tissues for performing action
-
a biomarker for risk of prematurity
-
-
An illustration of an emergent property is
-
bacteria
-
formula (milk supplement)
-
obesity
-
nonnutritive sucking
-
-
When assessing whether a premature infant is appropriate for oral feeding, which of the following factors should be considered?
-
Level of alertness
-
Level of respiratory support
-
Gestational age
-
Physiologic stability
-
All of the above
-
-
Which of the following is not a characteristic of infant feeding behavior as viewed through a dynamical systems approach?
-
Attractor dynamics
-
Exploratory behavior
-
Emergence
-
Gut microbiome
-
-
The “primitive” components of infant behavior, traditionally called reflexes, are governed by
-
cohesion
-
age
-
attractors
-
robustness
-
none of the above
Article Two (pp. 87–95)
-
-
In neonates, central pattern generators
-
have no role in swallowing function
-
are collections of neurons in the brainstem that ultimately coordinate the interactions between breathing and swallowing
-
cannot function without cortical input
-
only control sucking behavior
-
consist of only sensory neurons
-
-
The coordination of breathing and swallowing is necessary because
-
preterm infants cannot swallow
-
infants are obligate nasal breathers
-
the two vital functions must share common anatomy
-
apnea can impair swallowing function
-
breathing overrides swallowing
-
-
The most mature infant breathing and swallowing pattern is
-
swallow-exhale-inhale
-
inhale-swallow-exhale
-
exhale-swallow-exhale
-
inhale-swallow-inhale
-
swallow-inhale-exhale
-
-
The postswallow respiratory phase is believed to be important because
-
the positive pressure of exhalation can potentially clear the airway of any remaining material
-
inhalation can help to push the fluid into the esophagus
-
inhalation can protect from aspiration
-
apnea can stop aspiration from occurring
-
exhalation can open the airway
-
-
Esophageal motility
-
is unrelated to the respiratory cycle
-
has no role in swallowing function
-
is the same as gastroesophageal reflux
-
can be affected by the respiratory cycle because there is an inverse relationship between the pressures in the lungs and those in the esophagus
-
has never been studied in infants
Article Three (pp. 96–105)
-
-
Neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) infants most at risk of feeding problems include infants
-
classified as late preterm
-
who require mechanical ventilation
-
born < 28 weeks' gestation and with a birth weight < 1,000 grams
-
transported from one hospital to another
-
exposed to drugs during intrauterine life
-
-
In a NICU feeding culture focused on volume intake, staff typically do not
-
unswaddle the infant
-
consider a nipple flow rate manageable by the infant
-
view faster feeding as “good”
-
feed a drowsy infant
-
-
For infants in the NICU, aspiration is
-
rarely observed
-
always prevented by using a sidelying position during feeding
-
typically, silent
-
unlikely to cause changes in the lungs
-
-
For preterm infants, signs of stress during oral feeding
-
may include color changes, increased work of breathing
-
are no longer observed at term age
-
cannot be avoided
-
can be reduced by shorter feeding time
-
-
Research on co-regulated feeding has shown
-
reduced days to full oral feeding
-
improved intake and growth
-
greater maternal confidence
-
decreased heart rate fluctuation
-
all of the above
Article Four (pp. 106–115)
-
-
Flow rate has been shown to
-
be faster at the breast
-
be the best predictor of intake
-
affect swallowing integrity
-
support optimal ventilation
-
both C and D
-
-
Providing rest during feeding
-
can lead to fatigue
-
can improve stamina
-
typically involves 5-minute rest periods
-
is unlikely to support intake
-
interferes with the infant's active participation
-
-
Co-regulated pacing
-
is offered every three to five sucks
-
requires leaving the nipple in the infant's mouth
-
supports safety, endurance, and physiologic stability
-
should be used only at the beginning of the feeding
-
is no longer needed by term age
-
-
Prodding
-
promotes infant learning
-
is an essential intervention for success
-
allows the infant to be an active participant in the feeding
-
should be used when the infant is not rooting
-
may jeopardize adequate respirations and swallowing safety
-
-
The parent–infant relationship is best supported during feeding by
-
professional caregivers finishing a feeding
-
having parents feed the first bottle feeding in private
-
focusing on emptying the bottle
-
offering anticipatory guidance while parents learn along
-
ensuring the feeding is completed quickly
Article Five (pp. 116–125)
-
-
What percentage of children with severe developmental disabilities has some form of feeding problem?
-
10%
-
50%
-
65%
-
80 to 90%
-
30%
-
-
Who are potential members of the pediatric feeding team?
-
Speech-language pathologist
-
Occupational therapist
-
Gastroenterologist
-
Psychologist
-
All of the above
-
-
In the area of pediatric feeding assessment, there are
-
no commercially available assessments
-
many well-standardized and readily available assessment tools
-
many checklists and criterionbased assessments, but few wellstandardized instruments
-
a clear gold standard assessment used by most feeding therapists
-
several computer-based assessments available
-
-
Which intervention approach is most commonly used with children who have severe motor and muscle tone disorders?
-
Behavioral approaches
-
Neurodevelopmental or sensory/motor approaches
-
Surgeries for structural abnormalities
-
Intraoral appliances
-
Complex swallowing maneuvers
-
-
There is an urgent need in field of pediatric feeding for
-
standardized classification of types of feeding disorders
-
standardized assessment protocols
-
empirical research on the effectiveness of feeding intervention programming
-
guidelines to delineate which interventions match best with which type of pediatric feeding disorder
-
all of the above
Article Six (pp. 126–134)
-
-
Legislation relevant to the provision of dysphagia management in the schools includes
-
Rehabilitation Act of 1973
-
Americans with Disabilities Act
-
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act
-
Every Student Succeeds Act (formerly No Child Left Behind)
-
all of the above
-
-
Which of the following reasons provide justification for the provision of dysphagia services in the schools?
-
Students must be safe while eating in school.
-
Students must be adequately nourished and hydrated so that they can attend to and fully access the school curriculum.
-
Students must be healthy.
-
Students must develop skills for eating efficiently during meals and snack times so that they can complete these activities with their peers safely and in a timely manner.
-
All of the above are true.
-
-
The percent of school-based speechlanguage pathologists who are treating children with dysphagia is likely to be
-
less than 5%
-
between 5 and 10%
-
between 14 and 35%
-
between 35 and 45%
-
more than 45%
-
-
Which of the following is a good way for speech-language pathologists to increase communication across team members?
-
Keep a “working file” in a locked file cabinet.
-
Share personal passwords, so other professionals can access your records.
-
Tell all involved team members why your goals are the most important.
-
Talk to each other for shared cases (e.g., discuss instrumental findings).
-
Wait until other professionals ask for a report before you send it.
-
-
A possible innovative approach to increase training opportunities in the area of pediatric dysphagia may include
-
technologies such as telepractice for training
-
increasing mentoring opportunities
-
more face-to-face trainings
-
reducing conference fees
-
more graduate courses in pediatric dysphagia
Article Seven (pp. 135–146)
-
-
Advantages associated with the videofluoroscopic swallow study include that
-
it requires contrast medium
-
it can be completed with minimal patient cooperation
-
it provides a dynamic view of the structures of swallowing and contact aspiration
-
radiation exposure is low or inconsequential
-
the examination should be repeated every 3 months
-
-
Radiation exposure associated with videofluoroscopic swallow studies is influenced by all the following except
-
duration of the examination
-
pulse rate
-
experience of the personnel performing the examination
-
diminished sensitivity of children to ionizing radiation
-
specific diagnostic conditions and the associated swallowing impairments
-
-
The generally agreed upon optimal fluoroscopic pulse rate in children is
-
12.5 frames per second to limit radiation exposure
-
15 frames per second to limit radiation exposure
-
30 frames per second to detect supraglottic penetration during bottle-feeding
-
the lowest rate that enables image quality needed to capture necessary information
-
D and C
-
-
The most important advantage of fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with infants is
-
visualization of suck, swallow, and breathe sequencing
-
assessment of upper esophageal swallow function
-
determination of suck-to-swallow ratios for efficiency of sucking
-
direct observation of structure and function of hypopharynx and larynx
-
use of blue dye to identify laryngeal penetration and aspiration
-
-
A recent expansion of use of fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in specialized populations involves the following group(s)
-
infants feeding by bottle/nipple
-
infants feeding directly from the breast
-
transition feeders with puree by spoon
-
transition feeders with solid finger foods
-
children who receive nothing by mouth
Article Eight (pp. 147–158)
-
-
Early identification of neonates at risk for poor neurobehavioral functioning
-
is available through a number of commercially available tools
-
has become a part of routine screening in the neonatal intensive care unit
-
takes advantage of neuroplasticity mechanisms
-
is not necessary for prevention and/or treatment during infancy
-
-
Research correlating early sucking and later neurodevelopmental outcomes is limited by the fact that
-
methods used may alter sensory feedback during feeding
-
appraisal of sucking performance is based largely on subjective data
-
only a snapshot of sucking performance is analyzed
-
all of the above
-
-
To provide clear evidence of the association between early sucking and later neurodevelopment, we must
-
complete a randomized clinical control trial
-
correlate brain imaging with early patterns of sucking during bottlefeeding
-
identify an observational tool of early sucking with high interrater reliability
-
screen all preterm infants at discharge
-
-
Dynamical systems theory
-
emphasizes the importance of variability in any human movement
-
describes sucking in the context of three phases
-
fails to account for the coordination of sucking, swallowing, and breathing for safe, efficient sucking
-
fails to take into account the gestational age of infants
-
-
The variables of interest reported here
-
focus on movement variability of the nipple during sucking
-
are calculated taking the standard deviation of the mean and dividing by the mean
-
emphasize the motor learning and coordination aspects of neonatal sucking
-
are calculated across each sucking burst
-
all of the above
-