Early Postoperative Endoscopy for Evaluation of the Anastomosis after Esophageal Reconstruction

Abstract

Background Anastomotic leaks significantly affect hospital stay after esophageal surgery. Here, we investigated the efficacy of early endoscopy for predicting anastomotic healing and leaks after esophageal reconstruction.

Methods A total of 65 consecutive esophageal cancer patients treated by cervical esophagogastrostomy underwent routine endoscopy between postoperative days 5 and 7. The anastomosis was scored for the degree of ischemia, stenosis, and torsion of the anastomotic axis. Independent associations between ischemia, stenosis, and torsion of the proximal esophagus and the risk of the anastomotic leak were examined using Spearman's rank correlation method.

Results Assessment of the degree of mucosal ischemia in 65 patients shows well healing in 35, patch ischemia in 20, diffuse ischemia in 10, no necrosis in any patient. Stenosis was classified as 0 to 10% in 40 patients, 11 to 20% in 12, 21 to 80% in 11, and 81 to 100% in 2. The degree of torsion of the anastomotic axis was classified as 0 to 10 degrees in 52 patients, 11 to 90 degrees in 8, and 91 to 180 degrees in 5. With rising endoscopy scores, there was an increase in risk for leaks (score > 4.5, sensitivity 100%, and specificity 83.8%).

Conclusions Early postoperative endoscopy facilitates the management of esophagogastrostomy anastomosis to predict leaks.

Keywords

endoscopy - esophageal reconstruction - anastomosis

• References

• 1 Song IH, Cho S, Yang HC, Jheon S. The role of maximum standardized uptake value in PET/CT as a prognostic factor in patients with resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 63 (04) 335-340
• 2 Jeon HW, Kim KS, Sung SW, Park HJ, Kim YD, Park JK. Prognostic value of the maximum standardized uptake value on positron emission tomography for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 63 (04) 341-348
• 3 Gockel I, Niebisch S, Ahlbrand CJ. , et al. Risk and complication management in esophageal cancer surgery: a review of the literature. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016; 64 (07) 596-605
• 4 Huang HT, Wang F, Shen L, Xia CQ, Lu CX, Zhong CJ. Clinical outcome of middle thoracic esophageal cancer with intrathoracic or cervical anastomosis. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 63 (04) 328-334
• 5 Takemura M, Yoshida K, Fujiwara Y. Modified triangulating stapling technique for esophagogastrostomy after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 2013; 27 (04) 1249-1253
• 6 Cassivi SD. Leaks, strictures, and necrosis: a review of anastomotic complications following esophagectomy. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 16 (02) 124-132
• 7 Page RD, Shackcloth MJ, Russell GN, Pennefather SH. Surgical treatment of anastomotic leaks after oesophagectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005; 27 (02) 337-343
• 8 Boone J, Rinkes IB, van Leeuwen M, van Hillegersberg R. Diagnostic value of routine aqueous contrast swallow examination after oesophagectomy for detecting leakage of the cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis. ANZ J Surg 2008; 78 (09) 784-790
• 9 Solomon DG, Sasaki CT, Salem RR. An evaluation of the routine use of contrast radiography as a screening test for cervical anastomotic integrity after esophagectomy. Am J Surg 2012; 203 (04) 467-471
• 10 Tirnaksiz MB, Deschamps C, Allen MS, Johnson DC, Pairolero PC. Effectiveness of screening aqueous contrast swallow in detecting clinically significant anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy. Eur Surg Res 2005; 37 (02) 123-128
• 11 van Workum F, van den Wildenberg FJ, Polat F, de Wilt JH, Rosman C. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy: preliminary results after introduction of an intrathoracic anastomosis. Dig Surg 2014; 31 (02) 95-103
• 12 Maish MS, DeMeester SR, Choustoulakis E. , et al. The safety and usefulness of endoscopy for evaluation of the graft and anastomosis early after esophagectomy and reconstruction. Surg Endosc 2005; 19 (08) 1093-1102
• 13 Page RD, Asmat A, McShane J, Russell GN, Pennefather SH. Routine endoscopy to detect anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2013; 95 (01) 292-298
• 14 Park B, Kim HK, Choi YS, Kim J, Zo JI, Shim YM. Simultaneous resection of synchronous esophageal and gastric cancers. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016; 64 (07) 611-618
• 15 Burrows WM. Gastrointestinal function and related problems following esophagectomy. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 16 (02) 142-151
• 16 Xia BT, Rosato EL, Chojnacki KA, Crawford AG, Weksler B, Berger AC. Major perioperative morbidity does not affect long-term survival in patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. World J Surg 2013; 37 (02) 408-415
• 17 Atkins BZ, Shah AS, Hutcheson KA. , et al. Reducing hospital morbidity and mortality following esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 78 (04) 1170-1176 , discussion 1170–1176
• 18 Kunisaki C, Makino H, Akiyama H. , et al. Predictive factors for anastomotic leakage in the neck after retrosternal reconstruction for esophageal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 2008; 55 (81) 98-102
• 19 Eloubeidi MA, Desmond R, Arguedas MR, Reed CE, Wilcox CM. Prognostic factors for the survival of patients with esophageal carcinoma in the U.S.: the importance of tumor length and lymph node status. Cancer 2002; 95 (07) 1434-1443