Download PDF
J Pediatr Intensive Care 2017; 06(04): 234-239
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1604015
Review Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Ancillary Studies in Evaluating Pediatric Brain Death

Natalie Henderson
1   Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky, United States
,
Mark J. McDonald
2   Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Norton Children's Hospital, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

02 May 2017

28 May 2017

Publication Date:
29 June 2017 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

When confounding variables exist that inhibit the ability to diagnose brain death clinically in pediatric patients, ancillary tests may provide additional information for the practitioner in evaluating for the presence or absence of brain death. Multiple options exist but differ in availability, ease of administration, cost, safety profile, and reliability to accurately diagnose brain death. An important desirable quality of an ancillary test is eliminating false positives, which imply brain death when brain death is in fact not present. More commonly available ancillary studies include electroencephalograms, brain angiography through various modalities, brain stem auditory evoked potentials, and transcranial Doppler ultrasound. At this time, there is not an ancillary test with 100% reliability in diagnosing brain death that can replace the clinical brain death exam. Therefore, practitioners need to understand the strengths and limitations of the ancillary studies available at their hospital.

Keywords

pediatric - brain death - ancillary
 

  • References

  • 1 Nakagawa TA, Ashwal S, Mathur M. , et al; Society of Critical Care Medicine; Section on Critical Care and Section on Neurology of the American Academy of Pediatrics; Child Neurology Society. Guidelines for the determination of brain death in infants and children: an update of the 1987 Task Force recommendations. Crit Care Med 2011; 39 (09) 2139-2155
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Wijdicks EF. Brain death worldwide: accepted fact but no global consensus in diagnostic criteria. Neurology 2002; 58 (01) 20-25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Young GB, Shemie SD, Doig CJ, Teitelbaum J. Brief review: the role of ancillary tests in the neurological determination of death. Can J Anaesth 2006; 53 (06) 620-627
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 A definition of irreversible coma. Report of the ad hoc committee of the Harvard Medical School to examine the definition of brain death. JAMA 1968; 205 (06) 337-340
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Wijdicks EF. The case against confirmatory tests for determining brain death in adults. Neurology 2010; 75 (01) 77-83
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Ruiz-García M, Gonzalez-Astiazarán A, Collado-Corona MA, Rueda-Franco F, Sosa-de-Martínez C. Brain death in children: clinical, neurophysiological and radioisotopic angiography findings in 125 patients. Childs Nerv Syst 2000; 16 (01) 40-45
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ashwal S, Schneider S. Brain death in the newborn. Pediatrics 1989; 84 (03) 429-437
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Holzman BH, Curless RG, Sfakianakis GN, Ajmone-Marsan C, Montes JE. Radionuclide cerebral perfusion scintigraphy in determination of brain death in children. Neurology 1983; 33 (08) 1027-1031
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Bradac GB, Simon RS. Angiography in brain death. Neuroradiology 1974; 7 (01) 25-28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Ameratunga B, Jefferson NR, Rajapakse S. Further aspects of angiographic brain death. Australas Radiol 1976; 20 (03) 291-295
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Flowers Jr WM, Patel BR. Radionuclide angiography as a confirmatory test for brain death: a review of 229 studies in 219 patients. South Med J 1997; 90 (11) 1091-1096
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Goodman JM, Mishkin FS, Dyken M. Determination of brain death by isotope angiography. JAMA 1969; 209 (12) 1869-1872
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Goodman JM, Heck LL, Moore BD. Confirmation of brain death with portable isotope angiography: a review of 204 consecutive cases. Neurosurgery 1985; 16 (04) 492-497
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Coker SB, Dillehay GL. Radionuclide cerebral imaging for confirmation of brain death in children: the significance of dural sinus activity. Pediatr Neurol 1986; 2 (01) 43-46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Shimizu N, Shemie S, Miyasaka E. , et al. [Preliminary report: use of clinical criteria for the determination of pediatric brain death and confirmation by radionuclide cerebral blood flow]. Masui 2000; 49 (10) 1126-1132
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Heran MK, Heran NS, Shemie SD. A review of ancillary tests in evaluating brain death. Can J Neurol Sci 2008; 35 (04) 409-419
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Blend MJ, Pavel DG, Hughes JR, Tan WS, Lansky LL, Toffol GJ. Normal cerebral radionuclide angiogram in a child with electrocerebral silence. Neuropediatrics 1986; 17 (03) 168-170
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Kramer AH, Roberts DJ. Computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis of brain death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurocrit Care 2014; 21 (03) 539-550
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Karantanas AH, Hadjigeorgiou GM, Paterakis K, Sfiras D, Komnos A. Contribution of MRI and MR angiography in early diagnosis of brain death. Eur Radiol 2002; 12 (11) 2710-2716
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Kumada K, Fukuda A, Yamane K. , et al. [Diffusion-weighted imaging of brain death: study of apparent diffusion coefficient]. No To Shinkei 2001; 53 (11) 1027-1031
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Nakahara M, Ericson K, Bellander BM. Diffusion-weighted MR and apparent diffusion coefficient in the evaluation of severe brain injury. Acta Radiol 2001; 42 (04) 365-369
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Monsein LH. The imaging of brain death. Anaesth Intensive Care 1995; 23 (01) 44-50
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Aichner F, Felber S, Birbamer G, Luz G, Judmaier W, Schmutzhard E. Magnetic resonance: a noninvasive approach to metabolism, circulation, and morphology in human brain death. Ann Neurol 1992; 32 (04) 507-511
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Jardim M, Person OC, Rapoport PB. [Brainstem auditory evoked potentials as a method to assist the diagnosis of brain death]. Pro Fono 2008; 20 (02) 123-128
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Ruiz-López MJ, Martínez de Azagra A, Serrano A, Casado-Flores J. Brain death and evoked potentials in pediatric patients. Crit Care Med 1999; 27 (02) 412-416
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Wada S. [Brainstem auditory evoked potential]. Nihon Rinsho 1997; 55 (Suppl. 01) 368-370
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Fatouros PP, Wist AO, Kishore PR. , et al. Xenon/computed tomography cerebral blood flow measurements. Methods and accuracy. Invest Radiol 1987; 22 (09) 705-712
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Pistoia F, Johnson DW, Darby JM, Horton JA, Applegate LJ, Yonas H. The role of xenon CT measurements of cerebral blood flow in the clinical determination of brain death. Am J Neuroradiol 1991; 12 (01) 97-103
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Okuyaz C, Gücüyener K, Karabacak NI, Aydin K, Serdaroğlu A, Cingi E. Tc-99m-HMPAO SPECT in the diagnosis of brain death in children. Pediatr Int 2004; 46 (06) 711-714
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Ashwal S. Brain death in the newborn. Current perspectives. Clin Perinatol 1997; 24 (04) 859-882
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Segura T, Calleja S, Irimia P, Tembl JI. ; Spanish Society of Neurosonology. Recommendations for the use of transcranial Doppler ultrasonography to determine the existence of cerebral circulatory arrest as diagnostic support for brain death. Rev Neurosci 2009; 20 (3-4): 251-259
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Mata-Zubillaga D, Oulego-Erroz I. Persistent cerebral blood flow by transcranial Doppler ultrasonography in an asphyxiated newborn meeting brain death diagnosis: case report and review of the literature. J Perinatol 2012; 32 (06) 473-475
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Consensus Group on Transcranial Doppler in Diagnosis of Brain Death. Latin American consensus on the use of transcranial Doppler in the diagnosis of brain death. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva 2014; 26 (03) 240-252
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Monteiro LM, Bollen CW, van Huffelen AC, Ackerstaff RG, Jansen NJ, van Vught AJ. Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography to confirm brain death: a meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 2006; 32 (12) 1937-1944
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Escudero D, Otero J, Quindós B, Viña L. Transcranial Doppler ultrasound in the diagnosis of brain death. Is it useful or does it delay the diagnosis?. Med Intensiva 2015; 39 (04) 244-250
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Chiu NC, Shen EY, Lee BS. Reversal of diastolic cerebral blood flow in infants without brain death. Pediatr Neurol 1994; 11 (04) 337-340
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Hüttemann E, Schelenz C, Sakka SG, Reinhart K. Atropine test and circulatory arrest in the fossa posterior assessed by transcranial Doppler. Intensive Care Med 2000; 26 (04) 422-425
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar