RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1607424
Self-Assessment Questions
Publikationsverlauf
Publikationsdatum:
10. Oktober 2017 (online)

This section provides a review. Mark each statement on the Answer Sheet according to the factual materials contained in this issue and the opinions of the authors.
Article One (pp. 267–281)
-
Commonly used “noise thermometers”
-
often display data that underestimate true peak levels of firearm noise
-
are based on measurements from commonly available instrumentation (commercial sound level meters and dosimeters) that “saturate” or “clip” at approximately 150 dB
-
can provide misleading information that may cause an underestimation of auditory risk of firearm noise
-
should be updated to reflect true peak levels of firearm noise as measured at the shooter's ear
-
all of the above
-
-
Who of the following may be at risk for auditory damage from firearm noise?
-
The shooter
-
A bystander standing 1 meter to the left of the shooter
-
Sports officials using starter pistols
-
Athletes and spectators near officials who are firing starter pistols
-
All of the above
-
-
Although there are no mandated impulse noise limits imposed on recreational firearm shooters, the World Health Organization recommends peak sound pressure levels not exceeding
-
100 dB for adults and 110 dB for youth
-
120 dB for adults and 120 dB for youth
-
140 dB for adults and 120 dB for youth
-
160 dB for adults and 100 dB for youth
-
150 dB for adults with no recommendation for youth
-
-
Which of the following increases the risk of damage to the auditory system?
-
The use of muzzle brakes (ports)
-
The number of shots fired
-
Shooting in an enclosed (reverberant) environment
-
The use of high-velocity (supersonic) ammunition
-
All of the above
-
-
A firearm suppressor
-
will consistently reduce the peak sound pressure level (SPL) values to below hazardous levels
-
will negate the need for the use of hearing protection
-
will reduce the peak SPL values of firearm noise, but the levels may still be hazardous to hearing
-
may also be called “silencers,” because they completely silence the impulse noise from a firearm
-
will reduce the SPL of supersonic ammunition to below 100 dB
-
-
Which of the following statements is accurate regarding the attenuation provided by specialized hearing protectors (electronic, small-orifice, filtered) designed for shooting sports?
-
Specialized hearing protectors provide audibility of low-level environmental sounds while attenuating high-level impulse signals.
-
The electronics are designed to be fast enough to attenuate the peak impulse noise signal.
-
The labeled Noise Reduction Rating may underestimate the actual attenuation provided by the device for impulse noise signals.
-
The fit of the electronic hearing protector is unimportant.
-
All of the above are accurate.
Article Two (pp. 282–297)
-
-
The authors suggest that to increase effectiveness, hearing health messages should focus on
-
decreasing personal listening device (PLD) listening volume only
-
decreasing PLD listening duration only
-
stopping the use of PLDs
-
decreasing listening volume and/or durations based on listening activities and individual usage patterns
-
limiting PLD use to 2 hours per day
-
-
In the current study, listening durations and volumes showed an association with
-
age: listening durations decreased with age and younger users listened at higher volumes than those age 50 and over
-
age: listening durations increased with age and younger users listened at lower volumes than those age 50 and over
-
sex: males listened for longer durations and at higher volumes
-
sex: females listened for longer durations and at higher volumes
-
B and C
-
-
This study showed that
-
all PLD users are at high risk of hearing damage
-
PLD users are safe from hearing damage as long as they do not participate in other noisy activities
-
only young PLD users are at risk of hearing damage
-
approximately 15% of PLD users are at risk for hearing damage from their PLD listening habits alone
-
approximately 50% of PLD users are at risk for hearing damage from their PLD listening habits alone
-
-
Compared with the low-risk group, the higher-risk PLD groups
-
showed a greater proportion of selfreported hearing loss
-
were more likely to report experiencing difficulties relating to speech and conversation
-
reported listening at higher volumes
-
were more likely to listen for longer durations for most activities
-
all of the above
-
-
This article examined risk in relation to PLD daily noise dose (DND). A single PLD DND is equivalent to
-
listening for 90 minutes at a volume of 80 dB
-
listening for 8 hours at a volume of 85 dB
-
listening for 22 minutes at 90% volume
-
listening for 3 hours at 70% volume
-
both A and C
Article Three (pp. 298–318)
-
-
Unlike occupational noise, recreational noise is likely to be
-
easier to assess as a potential hazard for hearing loss
-
a fluctuating exposure of shorter duration as compared with occupational noise
-
an exposure that imposes a potentially high risk for hearing loss
-
a hazard that may result in “hidden hearing loss” based on data from a number of human studies
-
more frequently and consistently experienced
-
-
In the noise exposure questionnaire, the annual recommended exposure limit was
-
calculated for the combined occupational and nonoccupational exposures for 8,760 hours per year
-
a daily limit of 85 A-weighted decibels for 24 hours.
-
calculated for occupational exposures only
-
derived using a 5 dB exchange rate
-
derived using a 3 dB exchange rate for occupational exposures and a 5 dB exchange rate for recreational exposures
-
-
In the current study, women generally had
-
higher wave I amplitudes for tonebursts only
-
lower signal-to-noise ratios on the Words in Noise test
-
higher auditory brainstem response (ABR) wave I amplitudes
-
equal ABR wave I amplitudes compared with men
-
reduced ABR wave I amplitudes for clicks and tone-bursts as a function of increased noise exposure
-
-
Reductions in ABR wave I amplitude have been associated with which of the following in the literature?
-
Aging
-
All cases of hazardous noise exposure
-
Permanent threshold shifts only
-
Mice with low-frequency temporary threshold shifts
-
Permanent shifts in distortion product otoacoustic emission thresholds
-
-
Why is the concept of “hidden hearing loss” important?
-
It suggests that noise exposure that produces a temporary threshold shift can also have long-term consequences.
-
It consistently occurs in humans and underlies speech-in-noise difficulty in normal-hearing persons.
-
It appears to be undetectable by the most common clinical tests of hearing (the audiogram and distortion product otoacoustic emissions).
-
It is not important. The audiogram is sufficient for identifying noise injuries to the auditory system.
-
Both A and C are correct.
Article Four (pp. 319–331)
-
-
Approximately what proportion of participants believed that using a personal stereo player is a risk for hearing injury?
-
One in five
-
90%
-
Close to one-third
-
Less than 5%
-
75%
-
-
Which of the following statements is false?
-
Compared with normal hearing (NH) group participants, significantly fewer young adults with hearing impairment (HI) believed a future change in their hearing is likely.
-
Approximately 25% of participants with HI were not worried about the possibility of their hearing getting worse in the future.
-
There was no statistically significant difference between the HI and NH groups in worry about hearing getting worse in the future.
-
More participants with HI believed nightclubs and concerts pose a threat to hearing health than NH participants.
-
Half of the participants in the HI group were concerned about the possibility of their hearing getting worse in the future.
-
-
For young people in general, which of the following statements is correct?
-
Approximately 65% of all participants believed nightclubbing or loud concerts pose a risk.
-
More than 80% of NH group participants believed leisure-noise exposure contributes to developing a hearing loss.
-
A significantly higher proportion of the HI group believed the leisure activities of their peer group place them at risk.
-
Only one-third of the NH group believed their own activities pose a risk.
-
Use of personal stereo players was most frequently rated as a risk factor (both HI and NH groups).
-
-
Hearing aid use was reported during which of the following activities?
-
Nightclubbing
-
Shooting
-
Using power tools
-
Doing motor sports
-
All of the above
-
-
Which of the following points is made in the conclusion section of the article?
-
More research into the leisure activities of young people is needed.
-
Noise reduction in social venues should be pursued as a public health initiative.
-
Audiologists should place more emphasis on hearing loss prevention education.
-
Making hearing protectors more accessible would reduce community noise risk.
-
Lowering noise in social venues would make them less attractive to patrons.
Article Five (pp. 332–347)
-
-
A positive attitude to noise indicates
-
that loud noise is not perceived as dangerous
-
that a person dislikes loud noise
-
that a person can hear better in loud noise
-
that loud noise is perceived as dangerous
-
a belief that ears get used to loud noise
-
-
At what decibel level can frequent exposure become risky?
-
50
-
70
-
90
-
110
-
130
-
-
Which one of these factors was not identified as a barrier to earplug use?
-
They look silly.
-
They make the music sound muffled.
-
They do not protect your ears.
-
It is difficult to hear conversation.
-
They are uncomfortable.
-
-
The typology described in this article grouped participants based on
-
whether they have tinnitus or hearing loss
-
positive or negative attitudes to noise
-
how much loud music they listen to
-
their attitudes and behaviors toward leisure noise and hearing protection
-
how long they have had their hearing problems
-
-
Which one of these factors was a motivator for wearing earplugs?
-
Earplugs were a requirement of the venue
-
Previous experience of noiseinduced hearing problems
-
Wanting to protect their hearing
-
A and B
-
B and C
Article Six (pp. 348–358)
-
-
What is the perceived benefit of loud sound?
-
Arousal/excitement
-
Facilitation of socialization
-
Masking of both external sound and unwanted thoughts
-
To emphasize and enhance personal identity
-
All of the above
-
-
In classical conditioning, what is the unconditioned stimulus?
-
A naturally desirable stimulus
-
A naturally undesirable stimulus.
-
A stimulus that is initially neutral but that becomes desirable through conditioning
-
Loud sound
-
Any detectable stimulus
-
-
What is meant by “auditory adaptation”?
-
Processes such as inserting earplugs or otherwise attenuating sound
-
Turning down the volume on music amplifiers
-
Changes in the sensory cells and neurons of the auditory system in response to the ambient sound levels
-
Raising one's voice to talk in noisy rooms
-
All of the above
-
-
What are the soundscape dimensions of relevance to the perception of music in nightclubs?
-
Fun and excitement
-
Speed and activation
-
Loudness and pitch
-
Eventfulness and pleasantness
-
All of the above
-
-
What are the two main components of the theory of why people like loud sound proposed here?
-
Earplugs should be worn in nightclubs, and personal audio systems should be volume-limited.
-
The enjoyment of loud sound is conditioned, and tolerance to loud sound occurs via physiological adaptation.
-
Loud sound is fun, and people want it.
-
Everybody likes loud sound, and nightclubs meet that desire.
-
Loud music has psychological benefits, and other loud sounds cause harm.
-