Digital Devices Improve Chest Tube Management: Results from a Prospective Randomized Trial

Abstract

Background Digital devices could help clinical practice measuring the air leak, but their role is still debated. Aim of this study is to test advantages using these devices.

Methods From June 2012 to May 2015, we enrolled 95 patients undergoing lobectomy or wedge resection in a prospective randomized trial. Patients were divided into two groups: group D (digital, 50 patients) evaluated with digital device and group E (empirical, 45 patients) evaluated with water seal. Logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were used to select and assess predictors of persistent air leak. In group D, chest drain was removed if the air leak was absent or < 0.5 L/h for 12 consecutive hours and in group E if clinical signs of air leak were absent.

Results Mean hospitalization and mean chest tube stay was 6.0 ± 3.3 and 4.4 ± 3.2 days, respectively, prolonged air leak occurred in nine (8%). Hospitalization was 5.8 ± 2.5 versus 6.2 ± 4.2 days (p = 0.5), while mean chest tube stay was 4.1 ± 2.0 versus 4.6 ± 3.5 days (p = 0.4) in group D and group E, respectively. Clamping test was needed in one patient in group D and in seven in group E (p = 0.019). At multivariate analysis, heart disease (p < 0.0001), lobectomy (p < 0.0001), fused fissure (p < 0.0001), and air leakage in first postoperative (p.o.) day were predictors of persistent air leak (AUC on the ROC curve of 69.7%, sensibility: 77.8%). In group D, an air leak value > 0.2 L/h with spikes over 0.5 L/h in third p.o. was predictive of persistent air leak, with chest tube duration of 7.73 ± 5.20 versus 4.32 ± 1.33 days (AUC: 83%, sensitivity: 80%, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion In our experience, digital devices reduced observer variability and mistakes in chest tube management, thus identifying patients at risk for prolonged air leak.

Keywords

air leak - digital device - pneumothorax - prolonged air leak

Disclaimer

The German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (DGTHG) and The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon neither endorse nor discourage the use of the new technology described in this article.

• References

• 1 Liang S, Ivanovic J, Gilbert S. , et al. Quantifying the incidence and impact of postoperative prolonged alveolar air leak after pulmonary resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 145 (04) 948-954
• 2 Okereke I, Murthy SC, Alster JM, Blackstone EH, Rice TW. Characterization and importance of air leak after lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 79 (04) 1167-1173
• 3 Cerfolio RJ, Bass CS, Pask AH, Katholi CR. Predictors and treatment of persistent air leaks. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73 (06) 1727-1730 ; discussion 1730–1731
• 4 Brunelli A, Monteverde M, Borri A, Salati M, Marasco RD, Fianchini A. Predictors of prolonged air leak after pulmonary lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77 (04) 1205-1210 , discussion 1210
• 5 LoCicero III J, Hartz RS, Frederiksen JW, Michaelis LL. New applications of the laser in pulmonary surgery: hemostasis and sealing of air leaks. Ann Thorac Surg 1985; 40 (06) 546-550
• 6 Matar AF, Hill JG, Duncan W, Orfanakis N, Law I. Use of biological glue to control pulmonary air leaks. Thorax 1990; 45 (09) 670-674
• 7 Brunelli A, Al Refai M, Monteverde M. , et al. Pleural tent after upper lobectomy: a randomized study of efficacy and duration of effect. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 74 (06) 1958-1962
• 8 Alifano M, Jayle C, Bertin F. , et al; FOREseal Investigators. Medical and economic evaluation of FOREseal bioabsorbable reinforcement sleeves compared with current standard of care for reducing air leakage duration after lung resection for malignancy: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 2017; 265 (01) 45-53
• 9 Lijkendijk M, Licht PB, Neckelmann K. Electronic versus traditional chest tube drainage following lobectomy: a randomized trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2015; 48 (06) 893-898 ; discussion 898
• 10 Bjerregaard LS, Jensen K, Petersen RH, Hansen HJ. Early chest tube removal after video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy with serous fluid production up to 500 ml/day. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2014; 45 (02) 241-246
• 11 Cerfolio RJ, Bass C, Katholi CR. Prospective randomized trial compares suction versus water seal for air leaks. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 71 (05) 1613-1617
• 12 Anegg U, Lindenmann J, Matzi V. , et al. AIRFIX: the first digital postoperative chest tube airflowmetry--a novel method to quantify air leakage after lung resection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 29 (06) 867-872
• 13 Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS. The benefits of continuous and digital air leak assessment after elective pulmonary resection: a prospective study. Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 86 (02) 396-401
• 14 Suresh K. An overview of randomization techniques: An unbiased assessment of outcome in clinical research. J Hum Reprod Sci 2011; 4 (01) 8-11
• 15 Brunelli A, Cassivi SD, Salati M. , et al. Digital measurements of air leak flow and intrapleural pressures in the immediate postoperative period predict risk of prolonged air leak after pulmonary lobectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011; 39 (04) 584-588
• 16 Pompili C, Detterbeck F, Papagiannopoulos K. , et al. Multicenter international randomized comparison of objective and subjective outcomes between electronic and traditional chest drainage systems. Ann Thorac Surg 2014; 98 (02) 490-496 ; discussion 496–497
• 17 Afoke J, Tan C, Hunt I, Zakkar M. Might digital drains speed up the time to thoracic drain removal?. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2014; 19 (01) 135-138
• 18 Brunelli A, Salati M, Refai M, Di Nunzio L, Xiumé F, Sabbatini A. Evaluation of a new chest tube removal protocol using digital air leak monitoring after lobectomy: a prospective randomised trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010; 37 (01) 56-60
• 19 Gupta N. Pneumothorax: is chest tube clamp necessary before removal?. Chest 2001; 119 (04) 1292-1293
• 20 Varela G, Jiménez MF, Novoa NM, Aranda JL. Postoperative chest tube management: measuring air leak using an electronic device decreases variability in the clinical practice. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009; 35 (01) 28-31
• 21 Pompili C, Salati M, Refai M. , et al. Recurrent air leak soon after pulmonary lobectomy: an analysis based on an electronic airflow evaluation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016; 49 (04) 1091-1094 ; discussion 1094
• 22 Filosso PL, Ruffini E, Solidoro P, Molinatti M, Bruna MC, Oliaro A. Digital air leak monitoring after lobectomy for primary lung cancer in patients with moderate COPD: can a fast-tracking algorithm reduce postoperative costs and complications?. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2010; 51 (03) 429-433
• 23 Smargiassi A, Inchingolo R, Soldati G. , et al. The role of chest ultrasonography in the management of respiratory diseases: document II. Multidiscip Respir Med 2013; 8 (01) 55
• 24 Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS. Daily chest roentgenograms are unnecessary in nonhypoxic patients who have undergone pulmonary resection by thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 92 (02) 440-443