Nuklearmedizin 2001; 40(02): 38-43
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1623990
Originalarbeiten – Original Articles
Schattauer GmbH

Optimizing ventilation-perfusion lung scintigraphy: Parting with planar imaging

Optimierung der Ventilotions-Perfusionsszintigraphie: Abkehr von der planaren Bildgebung
P. Reinartz
1   Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Aachen University of Technology, Aachen, Germany
,
U. Schirp
1   Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Aachen University of Technology, Aachen, Germany
,
M. Zimny
1   Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Aachen University of Technology, Aachen, Germany
,
O. Sabri
1   Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Aachen University of Technology, Aachen, Germany
,
B. Nowak
1   Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Aachen University of Technology, Aachen, Germany
,
W. Schäfer
1   Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Aachen University of Technology, Aachen, Germany
,
U. Cremerius
1   Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Aachen University of Technology, Aachen, Germany
,
U. Büll
1   Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Aachen University of Technology, Aachen, Germany
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Received: 05. Oktober 2000

in revised form: 01. Dezember 2000

Publikationsdatum:
10. Januar 2018 (online)

Summary

Aim of the study was to introduce and verify a ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) acquisition protocol that incorporates new developments in scintigraphy in order to allow for a more balanced comparison with other diagnostic procedures. Methods: In 103 patients suspect of having pulmonary embolism, V/Q scans were acquired exclusively with SPECT technique. Ventilation was done with ultrafine aerosol. Planar images in eight directions were reconstructed through addition of three consecutive SPECT projections. Three referees examined the scans in regard to type, localization, and extent of V/Q defects. Results: Using this protocol, significantly more defects, especially of subsegmental size, were detected (p <0.Q1). Sensitivity, and diagnostic accuracy were also significantly improved (p <0.01) to 0.96, and 0.99, respectively. Furthermore, kappa values were increased up to 0.82 - a relevant enhancement in the ability to precisely localize V/Q defects. Conclusion: In conclusion this protocol provides high-resolution tomographic scans as well as high-quality planar images within a short acquisition time. Due to the significant increase in lesion detection, sensitivity, diagnostic accuracy, and anatomical localization of defects, it is a substantial improvement in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism that will put V/Q scintigraphy on a par with other tomographic methods.

Zusammenfassung

Ziel der Studie ist die Einführung und Evaluierung eines Ventilations-Perfusions-Akquisitionsprotokolles (V/Q), das neue technische Entwicklungen berücksichtigt und auf diese Weise einen ausgewogeneren Vergleich mit anderen tomographischen Verfahren erlaubt. Methodik: Bei 103 Patienten mit Verdacht auf Lungenembolie wurden V/Q-Akquisitionen ausschließlich in SPECT-Technik angefertigt. Die Ventilationsstudien erfolgten dabei unter Verwendung eines ultrafeinen Aerosols. Durch Addition von jeweils drei aufeinander folgenden SPECT-Projektionen wurden planare Bilder in acht Ansichten rekonstruiert. Drei Gutachter untersuchten die Studien hinsichtlich des Typs, der Lokalisation und des Ausmaßes von Defekten. Ergebnisse: Im Vergleich zur planaren Szintigraphie konnte durch Verwendung dieses Protokolles eine signifikant höhere Anzahl an Defekten detektiert werden (p < 0,01). Ebenso wurden sowohl die Sensitivität als auch die diagnostische Genauigkeit signifikant gesteigert (p <0,01). Darüber hinaus konnten Kappa-Werte von bis zu 0,82 ermittelt werden - ein Beleg für die deutlich verbesserte Lokalisierbarkeit von V/Q-Defekten in der SPECT-Akquisilion. Schlussfolgerung: Das vorliegende Protokoll liefert sowohl hochauflösende SPECT-Studien als auch planare Bilder von guter Qualität innerhalb einer verkürzten Akquisitionszeit. Aufgrund der signifikant gesteigerten Läsionsdetektions-rate, Sensitivität, diagnostischen Genauigkeit und anatomischen Lokalisierbarkeit von Befunden stellt es eine substanzielle Verbesserung innerhalb der Diagnostik der Lungenembolie dar, wodurch ein ausgewogenerer Vergleich moderner bildgebender Verfahren ermöglicht wird.

 
  • References

  • 1 Biersack HJ, Altland H, Knopp R, Winkler C. Single photon emission computed tomography of the lung: preliminary results. Eur J Nucl Med 1982; 7: 166-70.
  • 2 Burkiii GJ, Bell JR, Padley SP. Survey on the use of pulmonary scintigraphy, spiral CT and conventional pulmonary angiography for suspected pulmonary embolism in the British Isles. Clin Radiol 1999; 54: 807-10.
  • 3 Corbus HF, Seitz JP, Larson RK, Stobbe DE, Wooten W, Sayre JW, Chavez RD, Unguez CE. Diagnostic usefulness of lung SPET in pulmonary thromboembolism: an outcome study. Nucl Med Commun 1997; 18: 897-906.
  • 4 Cross JJ, Kemp PM, Walsh CG, Flower CD, Dixon AK. A randomized trial of spiral CT and ventilation perfusion scintigraphy for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Clin Radiol 1998; 53: 177-82.
  • 5 Davey NC, Smith TP, Hanson MW, Lee VS, Stackhouse DJ, Coleman RE. Ventilationperfusion lung scintigraphy as a guide for pulmonary angiography in the in the localization of pulmonary emboli. Radiology 1999; 213: 51-7.
  • 6 de Groot MR, Turkstra F, van Marwijk Kooy M, Oostdijk AH, van Beek EJ, Buller HR. Value of chest X-ray combined with perfusion scan versus ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. Thromb Haemost 2000; 83: 412-5.
  • 7 Dietlein M, Knapp WH, Lauterbach KW, Schicha H. Economic evaluation studies in nuclear medicine: the need for standardization. Eur J Nucl Med 1999; 26: 663-80.
  • 8 Dresel S, Stabler A, Scheidler J, Holzknecht N, Tatsch K, Hahn K. Diagnostic approach in acute pulmonary embolism: perfusion scintigraphy versus spiral computed tomography. Nucl Med Commun 1995; 16: 1009-15.
  • 9 Drucker EA, Rivitz SM, Shepard JA, Boiselle PM, Trotman-Dickenson B, Welch TJ, Maus TP, Miller SW, Kaufman JA, Waltman AC, McLoud TC, Athanasoulis CA. Acute pulmonary embolism: assessment of helical CT for diagnosis. Radiology 1998; 209: 235-41.
  • 10 Eustace S, Phelan N, Dowsett DJ, Ennis JT. A comparison of SPECT and planar ventilation perfusion lung scanning. Ir J Med Sei 1993; 162: 82-5.
  • 11 Ferretti GR, Bosson JL, Buffaz PD, Ayanian D, Pisón C, Blanc F, Carpentier F, Carpentier P, Coulomb M. Acute pulmonary embolism: role of helical CT in 164 patients with intermediate probability at ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy and normal results at duplex us of the legs. Radiology 1997; 205: 453-8.
  • 12 Garg K, Welsh CH, Feyerabend AJ, Subber SW, Russ PD, Johnston RJ, Durham JD, Lynch DA. Pulmonary embolism: diagnosis with spiral CT and ventilation-perfusion scanning - córrelation with pulmonary angiographic results or clinical outcome. Radiology 1998; 208: 201-8.
  • 13 Goodman LR, Lipchik RJ, Kuzo RS, Liu Y, McAuliffe TL, O’Brien DJ. Subsequent pulmonary embolism: risk after a negative helical CT pulmonary angiogram - prospective comparison with scintigraphy. Radiology 2000; 215: 535-42.
  • 14 Gottschalk A, Juni JE, Sostman HD, Coleman RE, Thrall J, McKusick EA, Froelich JW, Alavi A. Ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy in the PIOPED study. Part I. Data collection and tabulation. J Nucl Med 1993; 34: 1109-18.
  • 15 Gottschalk A, Sostman HD, Coleman RE, Juni JE, Thrall J, McKusick KA, Froelich JW, Alavi A. Ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy in the PIOPED study. Part II. Evaluation of the scintigraphic criteria and interpretations. J Nucl Med 1993; 34: 1119-26.
  • 16 Howarth DM, Lan L, Thomas PA, Allen LW. 99mTc technegas ventilation and perfusion lung scintigraphy for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolus. J Nucl Med 1999; 40: 579-84.
  • 17 Jacobsson H. Time to reconsider the PIOPED criteria? Letter to the editor. Eur J Nucl Med 2000; 27: 368.
  • 18 Kim KI, Muller NL, Mayo JR. Clinically suspected pulmonary embolism: utility of spiral CT. Radiology 1999; 210: 693-7.
  • 19 Kraemmer Nielsen H, Husted SE, Krusell LR, Charles P, Fasting H, Hansen HH. Observer variation in the interpretation of ventilation-perfusion lung scintigraphy. Eur J Nucl Med 1994; 21: 107.
  • 20 Kropp J, Buhr W, Bockisch A, Grunwald F, Ruhlmann J, Hotze A, Biersack HJ. Inhalation scintigraphy of the lung using the new ultrafine aerosol Technegas. Nuklearmedizin 1989; 28: 113-20.
  • 21 Magnussen JS, Chicco P, Palmer AW, Bush V, Mackey DW, Storey G, Magee M, Bautovich Van der, Wall H. Single-photon emission tomography of a computerised model of pulmonary embolism. Eur J Nucl Med 1999; 26: 1430-8.
  • 22 Magnussen JS, Chicco P, Palmer AW, Mackey DW, Magee M, Murray IPC, Bautovich G, Allman K, Storey G, Van der Wall H. Enhanced accuracy and reproducibility in reporting of lung scintigrams by a segmental reference chart. J Nucl Med 1998; 39: 1095-9.
  • 23 Mayo JR, Remy-Jardin M, Mueller NL, Remy J, Worsley DF, Hossein-Foucher C, Kwong JS, Brown MJ. Pulmonary embolism: prospective comparison of spiral CT with ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy. Radiology 1997; 205: 447-52.
  • 24 Michel BC, Seerden RJ, Rutten FFH, van Beek EJR, Bueller HR. The cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Health Econ 1996; 5: 307-18.
  • 25 Nagao M, Murase K, Ichiki T, Sakai S, Yasuhara Y, Ikezoe J. Quantitative analysis of Technegas SPECT: evaluation of regional severity of emphysema. J Nucl Med 2000; 41: 590-5.
  • 26 Perder A, Buswell L, Bounameaux H, Didier D, Morabia A, de Moerloose P, Slosman D, Unger PF, Junod A. Cost-effectiveness of noninvasive diagnostic aids in suspected pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med 1997; 157: 2309-16.
  • 27 Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Deschildre F, Artaud D, Beregi JP, Hossein-Foucher C, Marchandise X, Duhamel A. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with spiral CT: comparison with pulmonary angiography and scintigraphy. Radiology 1996; 200: 699-706.
  • 28 Roberts HC, Kauczor HU, Pitton MB, Schweden F, Thelen M. The algorithm of imaging diagnostics of pulmonary embolism - time for a new definition?. Fortschr Roentgenstr 1997; 166: 463-74.
  • 29 Robinson PJ. Ventilation-perfusion lung scanning and spiral computed tomography of the lungs: competing or complementary modalities?. Eur J Nucl Med 1996; 23: 1547-53.
  • 30 Schümichen C. Leitlinien für die Lungenszintigraphie. Nuklearmedizin 1999; 38: 233-6.
  • 31 Senden TJ, Moock KH, Gerald JF, Burch WM, Browitt RJ, Ling CD, Heath GA. The physical and chemical nature of technegas. J Nucl Med 1997; 38: 1327-33.
  • 32 Stein PD, Athanasoulis C, Alavi A, Greenspan RH, Hales CA, Saltzman HA, Vreim CE, Terrin ML, Weg JG. Complications and validity of pulmonary angiography in acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation 1992; 85: 462-8.
  • 33 Tourassi GD, Floyd CE, Coleman RE. Acute pulmonary embolism: cost-effectiveness analysis of the effect of artificial neural networks on patient care. Radiology 1998; 206: 81-8.
  • 34 van Rossum AB, Pattynama PM, Mallens WM, Hermans J, Heijerman HG. Can helical CT replace scintigraphy in the diagnostic process in suspected pulmonary embolism? A retrolec-tive-prolective cohort study focusing on total diagnostic yield. Eur Radiol 1998; 8: 90-6.
  • 35 Vanninen E, Tenhunen-Eskelinen M, Mussalo H, Toyry J, Laitinen O, Ahonen E, Lansimies E. Are three-dimensional surface-shaded SPET images better than planar and coronal SPET images in the assessment of regional pulmonary perfusion?. Nucl Med Commun 1997; 18: 423-30.