Nuklearmedizin 1984; 23(04): 193-195
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1624217
Originalarbeiten – Original Articles
Schattauer GmbH

A Comparison of the Cyclic Anhydride and Mixed Anhydride Methods for 111In-DTPA Chelation to Monoclonal Antibodies

Ein Vergleich der zyklischen Anhydrid- und gemischten Anhydrid-Methode für die 111In-DTPA Chelatisierung mit monoklonalen Antikörpern
T. S. T. Wang
**   The Departments of Microbiology and Immunology, New York College of Medicine, New York, N. Y, U.S.A
,
S. C. Srivastava
*   The Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, N. Y., U.S.A
,
R. A. Fawwaz
1   From the Departments of Radiology, Surgery and Pathology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, N. Y, U.S.A
,
P. Giacomini
1   From the Departments of Radiology, Surgery and Pathology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, N. Y, U.S.A
,
S. Ferrone
**   The Departments of Microbiology and Immunology, New York College of Medicine, New York, N. Y, U.S.A
,
P. Richards
1   From the Departments of Radiology, Surgery and Pathology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, N. Y, U.S.A
,
M. Hardy
1   From the Departments of Radiology, Surgery and Pathology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, N. Y, U.S.A
,
P. O. Alderson
1   From the Departments of Radiology, Surgery and Pathology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, N. Y, U.S.A
› Author Affiliations
This work was supported in part by NIH grants AM 30468 and HOL 14799.
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 28 March 1984

Publication Date:
11 January 2018 (online)

Summary

The cyclic anhydride (CA) and the mixed anhydride (MA) of DTPA were synthesized and used to chelate 111In to an antimelanoma monoclonal antibody. The CA and MA methods showed mean labeling efficiencies of 25.7 and 20.5%, respectively (p = NS). The binding efficiency of labeled antibody to human melanoma cells in tissue culture also was similar (x̄ = 52 and 50%, respectively, p = NS), as was tumor uptake in nude mice at 96 hrs post-injection (16%-CA vs 12%-MA). The method required less complicated chemical syntheses, much less preparation time, and the product was stable over a much longer period. The results suggest that the CA method is preferable for bifunctional chelate labeling of monoclonal antibodies with 111In-DTPA.

Zusammenfassung

Das zyklische Anhydrid (CA) und das gemischte Anhydrid (MA) des DTPA wurden synthetisiert und angewandt, um 111In mit einem Antimelanom monoklonalen Antikörper zu chelatisieren. Beide Methoden zeigten durchschnittliche Markierungsausbeuten von 25,7 bzw. 20,5% (p = n.s.). Die Markierungsausbeute markierter Antikörper mit menschlichen Melanomzellen in Zellkulturen war ähnlich (x̄ = 52 bzw. 50%, p = n.s.), wie auch die Tumoraufnahme in Nacktmäusen 26 Std. nach Injektion (16% CA vs. 12% MA). Die CA-Methode erforderte weniger komplizierte chemische Synthesen, eine kürzere Vorbereitung, und das Produkt war viel länger stabil. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, daß die CA-Methode für die bifunktionelle Markierung monoklonaler Antikörper mit 111In-DTPA vorzuziehen ist.

 
  • References

  • 1 DeRiemer L. G., Mears C. F. BLEDTATumor localization by a bleomycin analogue containing a metal-chelate group. J. med. Chem. 1979; 22: 1019-23.
  • 2 Eckelman W. C., Levenson S. M. Radiopharmaceuticals labeled with technetium. Int. J. appl. Radiat. Isot. 1977; 28: 67-82.
  • 3 Eckelman W. C., Paid C. H., Reba R. C. Radiolabeling of antibodies. Cancer Res. 1980; 40: 3036-42.
  • 4 Fairweather D. S., Bradwell A. R., Dykes P. W. et al. Improved tumor localization using Indium111 labeled antibodies. Brit. med. J. 1983; 287: 167-70.
  • 5 Goldenberg D. M. Tumor imaging with monoclonal antibodies. J. nucl. Med. 1983; 24: 360-2.
  • 6 Goodwin D. A., Mears C. F., Diamanti C. I. et al. Bifunctional chelates for radiopharmaceutical labeling. Nucl. Med. 1975; 14: 365-73.
  • 7 Goodwin D. A., Mears C. F. Bifunctional chelates for radiopharmaceutical labeling. In: Radiopharmaceuticals Structure-Activity Relationship. 1980. Spencer E. P. Ed. 281-306 Grune & Stratton; New York, N.Y:
  • 8 Halpern S. E., Hagan P. L., Graver P. R. Comparison on In-111 anti-CEA monoclonal antibody (MoAb) and endogenously labeled Se75 MoAbs in normal and tumor-bearing mice. J. nucl. Med. 1982; 23: 8.
  • 9 Hnatowich D. J., Layne W. W., Childs R. L. The preparation and labeling of DTPAcoupled albumin. Int. J. appl. Radiat. Isot. 1982; 33: 327-32.
  • 10 Hnatowich D. J., Layne W. W., Childs R. L. et al. Radioactive labeling of antibody A simple and efficient method. Science. 1983; 220: 613-5.
  • 11 Krejczarek G. E., Tucker K. L. Covalent attachment of chelating groups to macromolecules. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 1977; 77: 581-1.
  • 12 Larson S. M., Brown J. P., Wright P. W. et al. Imaging of melanoma with In-111 labeled monoclonal antibodies. J. nucl. Med. 1983; 24: 124-9.
  • 13 Layne W. W., Hnatowich D. J., Doherty P. W. et al. Evaluation of the viability of In-111 labeled DTPA coupled to fibrinogen. J. nucl. Med. 1982; 23: 627-30.
  • 14 Leung C. S., Mears H. C.F., Goodwin D. A. The attachment of metal-chelating groups to protein-tagging of albumin by diazonium coupling and use of the products as radiopharmaceuticals. Int. 1. appl. Radiat. Isot. 1978; 29: 687-92.
  • 15 Mach J. P., Carrel S., Forni M. et al Tumor localization of radiolabeled antibodies against carcinoembryonic antigen in patients with carcinoma. New Engl. J. Med. 1980; 303: 5-10.
  • 16 Mears C. T., Goodwin D. A., Leung C. S.H. et al. Covalent attachment of metal chelates to proteins: The stability in vivo and in vitro of the conjugate of albumin with a chelate of Indium 111. Proc. natl. Acad. Sei. USA. 1976; 73: 3803-6.
  • 17 Natali T. G., Imai G., Wilson B. S. et al. Structural properties and tissue distribution of the antigen recognized by the monoclonal antibody 653.40S to human melanoma cells. J. natl. Cancer Inst. 1981; 67: 591-601.
  • 18 Paik C. H., Herman D. E., Eckelman W. C. et al. Synthesis, plasma clearance and in vitro stability of protein containing a conjugated In-111 chelate. 1. radiomed. Chem. 1980; 57: 553-64.
  • 19 Paik C. H., Murphy P. R., Ebbert M. A. et al. Comparison of three methods for DTPA conjugation to antibody. J. nucl. Med. 1983; 24: 31.
  • 20 Paik C. H., Ebbert M. A., Murphy P. R. et al. Factors influencing DTPA conjugation with antibodies by cyclic DTPA anhydride. J. nucl. Med. 1983; 24: 1158-63.
  • 21 Paik C. H., Murphy P. R., Eckelman W. C., Volkert W. A., Reba R. C. Optimization of the DTPA mixed-anhydride reaction with antibodies at low concentration. J. nucl. Med. 1983; 24: 932-6.
  • 22 Scheinberg D. A., Strand M., Otto A. G. Tumor imaging with radioactive chelates conjugated to monoclonal antibodies. Science 1982; 215: 1511-3.
  • 23 Scheinberg D. A., Strand M. Leukemic cell targeting and therapy by monoclonal antibody in a mouse model. Cancer Res. 1982; 42: 44.
  • 24 Sfakianakis G. N., DeLand F. H. Radioimmunodiagnosis and radioimmunotherapy. J. nucl. Med. 1982; 23: 845-50.
  • 25 Sundberg M. W., Mears C. T. et al. Selective binding of metal ions to macromolecules using bifunctional analogs of EDTA. J. med. Chem. 1974; 17: 1304-7.
  • 26 Wahl R. L., Parker C. W., Philpott G. W. Improved radioimaging and tumor localization with monoclonal (Fab’)2 . J. nucl. Med. 1983; 24: 316-25.
  • 27 Yeh S. M., Mears C. F., Goodwin D. A. Decomposition rates of radiopharmaceutical indium chelates in serum. J. radiomed. Chem. 1979; 53: 327-36.
  • 28 Yeh S. M., Sherman D. G., Mears C. F. A n. e.w route to “bifunctional” chelating agents. Conversion of amino acids to analogs of ethylenedinitrilatetraacetic acid. Analyt. Biochem. 1979; 100: 152-9.