Methods Inf Med 2011; 50(03): 217-236
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1625243
Original Articles
Schattauer GmbH

Discussion of “Biomedical Ontologies: Toward Scientific Debate”

M. Brochhausen
1   Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany
,
A. Burgun
2   Inserm U936, Department of Medical Informatics, Rennes 1 University, Rennes, France
,
W. Ceusters
3   University at Buffalo, Buffalo NY, USA
,
A. Hasman
4   AMC-University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
T. Y. Leong
5   National University of Singapore, Singapore
,
M. Musen
6   Stanford University, Stanford, USA
,
J. L. Oliveira
7   University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
,
M. Peleg
8   University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
,
A. Rector
9   University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
,
S. Schulz
10   Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
20. Januar 2018 (online)

 

 
  • References

  • 1 Maojo V, Crespo J, Garcia-Remesal M, de la Iglesia D, Pérez-Rey D, Kulikowski C. Biomedical Ontologies: Toward scientific debate. Methods Inf Med 2011; 50 (03) 203-216.
  • 2 Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.. Sicherung guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis. Safeguarding good scientific practice. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag; 1998
  • 3 Hames I. Peer review and manuscript management in scientific journals. Guidelines for Good Practice. Malden MA Oxford, Victoria: Blackwell Publ.; 2007
  • 4 Basic Formal Ontology: http://www.ifomis.org/bfo/1.1. Last accessed: 02/27/2011.
  • 5 Spear AD. BFO. Manual Ontology for the Twenty First Century: An Introduction with Recommendations. Saarbrücken, Germany; 2006
  • 6 Basic Formal Ontology: Users: http://www.ifomis.org/bfo/users. Last accessed: 02/27/2011.
  • 7 Armstrong DM. Universals and scientific realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1978
  • 8 Cocchiarella N. Conceptual Realism as a Formal Ontology. In: Poli R, Simons P. editors. Formal Ontology. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer; 1996. pp 27-60.
  • 9 Lowe EJ. The Four-Category Ontology: A Metaphysical Foundation for Natural Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006
  • 10 Aristotle, Ackrill JL. editor & translator. Categories and De Interpretatione. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1963
  • 11 Gracia JG, Noone TB. editors. A companion to philosophy in the Middle Ages, Malden MA. Oxford, Victoria: Blackwell Publ.; 2003
  • 12 Crombie AC. Robert Grosseteste and the Origins of Experimental Science. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1971
  • 13 Lohr CH. The ancient philosophical legacy and its transmission to the Middle Ages. In: Gracia JJE, Noone TB. editors. A companion to philosophy in the Middle Ages, Malden MA Oxford, Victoria: Blackwell Publ.; 2003
  • 14 Grant E. God and Reason in the Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001
  • 15 McCarthy J. Circumscription – A Form of Non-Monotonic Reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 1980; 13 (05) 27-39.
  • 16 Hayes PJ. The Second Naive Physics Manifesto. In: Hobbs JR, Moore RC. editors. Formal Theories of the Common- Sense World. Norwood: Ablex; 1985. pp 1-36.
  • 17 http://suo.ieee.org. Last accessed: 02/26/2011.
  • 18 Gruber TR. A translation approach to portable ontologies. Knowledge Acquisition 1993; 5 (02) 199-220.
  • 19 Davis R, Shrobe H, Szolovits P. What is a Knowledge Representation?. AI Magazine 1993; 14 (01) 17-33.
  • 20 Grenon P, Smith B. SNAP and SPAN: Towards Dynamic Spatial Ontology. Spatial Cognition and Computation 2004; 4: 69-103.
  • 21 Grenon P, Smith B, Goldberg L. Biodynamic Ontology: Applying BFO in the Biomedical Domain. In: Pisanelli DM. editor. Ontologies in Medicine: Proceedings of the Workshop on Medical Ontologies. Rome October 2003; Stud Health Technology Inform 2004 102. 20-38.
  • 22 Smith B, Brochhausen M. Establishing and harmonizing ontologies in an interdisciplinary health care clinical research environment. Stud Health Technol Inform 2008; 134: 219-233.
  • 23 Doerr M, Hunter J, Lagoze C. Towards a Core Ontology for information integration. Journal of Digital Information 2003 4 01 Article No. 169.
  • 24 http://www.obofoundry.org. Last accessed: 02/26/2011.
  • 25 Smith B, Ashburner M, Rosse C, Bard J, Bug W, Ceusters W. et al. The OBO Foundry: Coordinated Evolution of Ontologies to Support Biomedical Data Integration. Nat Biotechnol 2007; 25 (11) 1251-1255.
  • 26 Noy N, de Coronado S, Solbrig H, Fragoso G, Hartel FW, Musen MA. Representing the NCI Thesaurus in OWL DL: modeling tools help modeling languages. Appl Ontol 2008; 3 (03) 173-190.
  • 27 Bittner T, Smith B. : Normalizing Medical Ontologies Using Basic Formal Ontology. Tagungs-band der 49 Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie 2004
  • 28 Smith B, Ceusters W, Klagges B, Köhler J, Kumar A, Lomax J, Mungall C, Neuhaus F, Rector AL, Rosse C. Relations in biomedical ontologies. Genome Biol 2005; 6 (05) R46.
  • 29 Smith B, Ceusters W. Ontological Realism as a Methodology for Coordinated Evolution of Scientific Ontologies. Applied Ontology 2010; 5: 139-188.
  • 30 Good IJ. A Classification of Fallacious Arguments and Interpretations. Technometrics 1962; 4: 125-132.
  • 31 Lord P, Stevens R. Adding a little reality to building ontologies for biology. PLoS One 2010; 5 (09) e12258.
  • 32 Dumontier M, Hoehndorf R. Realism for scientific ontologies. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS) 2010. pp 387-399.
  • 33 Goldstein S. Bohmian Mechanics. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Spring 2009 edition. Edited by Zalta EN; 2009
  • 34 Baum R, Sheehan W. In Search of Planet Vulcan, The Ghost in Newton’s Clockwork Machine. New York: Plenum Press; 1997
  • 35 Feynman RP, Leighton RB, Sands ML. The Feynman Lectures on Physics: The electromagnetic field. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.; 1965
  • 36 Celikoglu M, Kazanci F, Miloglu O, Oztek O, Kamak H, Ceylan I. Frequency and characteristics of tooth agenesis among an orthodontic patient population. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010; 15 (05) e797-801.
  • 37 Vahid-Dastjerdi E, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Mahdian M, Amini N. Non-syndromic hypodontia in an Iranian orthodontic population. J Oral Sci 2010; 52 (03) 455-461.
  • 38 Fekonja A. Hypodontia in orthodontically treated children. Eur J Orth 2005; 27 (05) 457-460.
  • 39 Pfeiffer T, Hoffmann R. Large-Scale Assessment of the Effect of Popularity on the Reliability of Research. PLoS One 2009; 4 (06) e5996.
  • 40 Ioannidis J. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med 2005; 2 (08) e124.
  • 41 Goodman SN, Royall R. Evidence and scientific research. Am J Public Health 1988; 78 (12) 1568-1574.
  • 42 Schulz S, Schober S, Tudose I, Stenzhorn H. The Pitfalls of Thesaurus Ontologization – the Case of the NCI Thesaurus. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2010 pp 727-731.
  • 43 Russell B. The Impact of Science on Society. London: Unwin Paperbacks; 1976. (reprint 1952).
  • 44 Klein GO, Smith B. Concept Systems and Ontologies: Recommendations for Basic Terminology. Trans Jpn Soc Artif Intell 2010; 25 (03) 433-441.
  • 45 Swanson DR. Fish oil, Raynaud’s syndrome, and undiscovered public knowledge. Perspect Biol Med 1986; 30 (01) 7-18.
  • 46 Swanson DR. Medical literature as a potential source of new knowledge. Bull Med Libr Assoc 1990; 78 (01) 29-37.
  • 47 van Haagen HH, ’t Hoen PA Botelho Bovo A, de Morrée A, van Mulligen EM, Chichester C, Kors JA, den Dunnen JT, van Ommen GJ, van der Maarel SM, Kern VM, Mons B, Schuemie MJ. Novel protein-protein interactions inferred from literature context. PLoS One 2009; 4 (11) e7894.
  • 48 Frankish K, Evans JSBT. The duality of mind: An historical perspective. In: Evans J, Frankish K. editors. In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond. Oxford University Press; 2009
  • 49 Carey S. The Origin of Concepts. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009
  • 50 Neapolitan RE. Probabilistic Methods for Bioinformatics. Morgan Kaufmann; 2009
  • 51 Chater N, Oaksford M. editors. The probabilistic mind: Prospects for Bayesian cognitive science. Oxford University Press; 2008
  • 52 McClelland JL. The place of modeling in cognitive science. Topics in Cognitive Science 2009; 1 (01) 11-38.
  • 53 Getoor L, Friedman N, Koller D, Pfeffer A, Taskar B. Probabilistic Relational Models. In: Getoor L, Taskar B. editors. Introduction to Statistical Relational Learning. MIT Press; 2007
  • 54 Rubin DL, Shah NH, Noy NF. Biomedical ontologies: a functional perspective. Brief Bioinform 2008; 9 (01) 75-90.
  • 55 Gibson F, Malone J. Community driven ontology development. Ontogenesis Knowledge Blog 2010; online at http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org 217 (accessed March 14, 2011).
  • 56 Goble C, Wroe C. The Montegues and the Capulets. Comp Funct Genomics 2004; 5 (08) 623-632.
  • 57 The Gene Ontology Consortium.. The Gene Ontology in 2008. Nucleic Acids Research 2008; 36 Database issue D440-D444.
  • 58 Smith B, Grenon P. The cornucopia of formal-ontological relations. Dialectica 2004; 58: 279-296.
  • 59 Noy NF, Shah NH, Whetzel PL. et al. BioPortal: Ontologies and integrated data resources at the click of a mouse. Nucleic Acids Research 2009; 37 Web server issue W170-W173.
  • 60 Merrill GH. Ontological realism: Methodology or misdirection. Applied Ontology 2010; 5 (02) 79-108.
  • 61 Merrill GH. Realism and reference ontologies: Considerations, reflections and problems. Applied Ontology 2010; 5 (03) 189-221.
  • 62 Romero MM, Vázquez-Naya JM, Munteanu CR, Pereira J, Pazos A. An Approach for the Automatic Recommendation of Ontologies Using Collaborative Knowledge. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2010; 6277/2010: 74-81.
  • 63 Bodenreider O. Biomedical ontologies in action: role in knowledge management, data integration and decision support. Yearb Med Inform 2008 pp 67-79.
  • 64 Matos S, Arrais JP, Maia-Rodrigues J, Oliveira JL. Concept-based query expansion for retrieving gene related publications from MEDLINE. BMC Bioinformatics 2010; 11: 212.
  • 65 Renear AH, Palmer CL. Strategic Reading, Ontologies, and the Future of Scientific Publishing. Science 2009; 325 5942 828-832.
  • 66 Peleg M, Yeh I, Altman RB. Modeling biological processes using Workflow and Petri Net models. Bioinformatics 2002; 18 (06) 825-837.
  • 67 Peleg M, Gabashvili IS, Altman RB. Qualitative models of molecular function: linking genetic polymorphisms of tRNA to their functional sequelae. Proc IEEE 2002; 90 (12) 1875-1886.
  • 68 The Gene Ontology Consortium.. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nature Genetics 2000; 25: 25-29.
  • 69 Blake JA, Bult CJ. Beyond the data deluge: Data integration and bio-ontologies. J Biomed Inform 2006; 39 (03) 314-320.
  • 70 Perez-Rey D, Maojo V, Garcia-Remesal M, AlonsoCalvo R, Billhardt H, Martin-Sanchez F. et al. ONTOFUSION: ontology-based integration of genomic and clinical databases. Comput Biol Med 2006; 36 7–8 712-730.
  • 71 Baker PG, Goble CA, Bechhofer S, Paton NW, Stevens R, Brass A. An ontology for bioinformatics applications. Bioinformatics 1999; 15 (06) 510-520.
  • 72 Peleg M, Rubin D, Altman RB. Using Petri Net Tools to Study Properties and Dynamics of Biological Systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005; 12 (02) 181-199.
  • 73 Shahar Y, Miksch S, Johnson P. The Asgaard Project: A Task-Specific Framework for the Application and Critiquing of Time-Oriented Clinical Guidelines. Artif Intell Med 1998; 14 1–2 29-51.
  • 74 Shankar RD, Martins SB, Tu SW, Goldstein MK, Musen MA. Building an explanation function for a hypertension decision-support system. Stud Health Technol Inform 2001; 84 Pt 1 538-542.
  • 75 Grando A, Peleg M, Glasspool D. A goal-oriented framework for specifying clinical guidelines and handling medical errors. J Biomed Inform 2010; 43 (02) 287-299.
  • 76 Peleg M, Beimel D. Using closed-world reasoning with OWL to implement policy-based classification. Proc. Third International Conference on Model-Based Systems Engineering Fairfax, Virginia: 2010
  • 77 Nagasaki M, Saito A, Jeong E, Li C, Kojima K, Ikeda E. et al. Cell Illustrator 4.0: A computational platform for systems biology. In Silico Biology 2010; 10 1–2 5-26.
  • 78 Rzhetsky A, Wajngurt D, Park N, Zheng T. Probing genetic overlap among complex human pheno-types. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104 (28) 11694-11699.
  • 79 Peleg M, Asbeh N, Kuflik T, Schertz M. Onto-clust – a methodology for combining clustering analysis and ontological methods for identifying groups of comorbidities for developmental disorders. J Biomed Inform 2009; 42 (01) 165-175.
  • 80 Uzuner O, Goldstein I, Luo Y, Kohane I. Identifying Patient Smoking Status from Medical Discharge Records. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008; 15 (01) 14-24.
  • 81 Rzhetsky A, Seringhaus M, Gerstein M. Seeking a New Biology through Text Mining. Cell Jul 11; 2008; 134 (01) 9-13.
  • 82 Coulet A, Shah N, Garten Y, Musen M, Altman RB. Using text to build semantic networks for pharmacogenomics. J Biomed Inform 2010; 43 (06) 1009-1019.
  • 83 Smith B. The basic tools of formal ontology. Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS). Amsterdam: IOS Press (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications); 1998. pp 19-28.
  • 84 Smith B. The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration. Nat Biotechnol 2007; 25 (11) 1251-1255.
  • 85 Winston P. Artificial Intelligence. Third Edition. Addison Wesley; 1992
  • 86 Ringland GA, Duce DA. Approaches to Knowledge Representation: An Introduction. John Wiley; 1988
  • 87 Tu SW, Eriksson H, Gennari JH, Shahar Y, Musen MA. Ontology-based configuration of problem-solving methods and generation of knowledge-aquisition tools – application of PROTEGE-II to protocol-based decision-support. Artif Intell Med 1995; 7 (03) 257-289.
  • 88 Baader F, Calvanese D, McGinness DL, Nardi D, Patel-Schneider PF. editors. The Description Logic Handbook. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 2003. p 555.
  • 89 Rector AL. Description logics in medical informatics. In: Baader F, Calvanese D, McGuinness DL, Nardi D, Patel-Schneider PF. editors. The Description Logic Handbook. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 2002. pp 406-426.
  • 90 Wolstencroft K, Lord P, Tabernero L, Brass A, Stevens R. Protein classification using ontology classification. Bioinformatics 2006; 22 (14) e530-538.
  • 91 Yue L, Reisdorf WC. Pathway and ontology analysis: emerging approaches connecting transcriptome data and clinical endpoints. Curr Mol Med 2005; 5 (01) 11-21.
  • 92 Weng C, Tu SW, Sim I, Richesson R. Formal representation of eligibility criteria: A literature review. J Biomed Inform 2010; 43 (03) 451-467.
  • 93 Gruber TR. Toward Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing. International Journal Human-Computer Studies 1995; 43 5–6 907-928.
  • 94 Quine W. On What There Is. Review of Metaphysics (1948). http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/On_What_There_Is. Last accessed: Mar 28 2011
  • 95 Hofweber T. Logic and Ontology, Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. Available from: plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-ontology. Last accessed: Mar 5 2011
  • 96 Rector AL. Barriers, approaches and research priorities for integrating biomedical ontologies. Semantic Health Deliverable 6.1 www.semantichealth.org/DELIVERABLES/SemanticHEALTH_D6_1.pdf
  • 97 Woods WA. What’s in a Link: Foundations for Semantic Networks. In: Bobrow DG, Collins AM. (eds.). Representation and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science. Academic Press; 1975. pp 35-82.
  • 98 W3C.. Working Group OWL 2 (2009) Web Ontology Language Document Overview. www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview Last accessed: Mar 5 2011
  • 99 Hoehndorf R, Dumontier M, Oellrich A, Wimalaratne S, Rebholz-Schuhmann D, Schoeld P, Gkoutos GV. A common layer of interoperability for biomedical ontologies based on OWL EL. Bioinformatics 2011 Epub ahead of print.
  • 100 IHTSDO (International Health Terminology Standards Development Organisation).. Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine – Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT), 2010. Available from: http://www.ihtsdo.org/snomed-ct. Last accessed: Mar 5 2011
  • 101 Spackman KA, Campbell KE. Compositional concept representation using SNOMED: towards further convergence of clinical terminologies. Proc AMIA Symp 1998 pp 740-744.
  • 102 Glimm B, Horrocks I, Motik B. Optimized Description Logic Reasoning via Core Blocking. In: Proc. of the 2010 Description Logic Workshop (DL 2010), volume 573 of CEUR, 2010. http://sunsite. informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Publications/CEURWS/Vol-573. Last accessed: Mar 5, 2011
  • 103 Schulz S, Spackman K, James A, Cocos C, Boeker M. Scalable representations of diseases in biomedical ontologies. Journal of Biomedical Semantics 2011 Accepted for publication.