Download PDF
Methods Inf Med 2007; 46(02): 242-246
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1625415
Original Article
Schattauer GmbH

Cortical Dipole Imaging of Movement-related Potentials by Means of Parametric Inverse Filters Incorporating with Signal and Noise Covariance

J. Hori
1   Department of Biocybernetics, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
2   Center for Transdisciplinary Research, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
,
T. Miwa
1   Department of Biocybernetics, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
,
T. Ohshima
1   Department of Biocybernetics, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
,
B. He
3   Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
11 January 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objective : The objective of this study is to explore suitable spatial filters for inverse estimation of cortical equivalent dipole layer imaging from the scalp electroencephalogram. We utilize cortical dipole source imaging to locate the possible generators of scalpmeasured movement-related potentials (MRPs) in human.

Methods : The effects of incorporating signal and noise covariance into inverse procedures were examined by computer simulations and experimental study. The parametric projection filter (PPF) and parametric Weiner filter (PWF) were applied to an inhomogeneous threesphere head model under various noise conditions.

Results : The present simulation results suggest that the PWF incorporating signal information provides better cortical dipole layer imaging results than the PPF and Tikhonov regularization under the condition of moderate and high correlation between signal and noise distributions. On the other hand, the PPF has better performance than other inverse filters under the condition of low correlation between signal and noise distributions. The proposed methods were applied to self-paced MRPs in order to identify the anatomic substrate locations of neural generators. The dipole layer distributions estimated by means of PPF are well-localized as compared with blurred scalp potential maps and dipole layer distribution estimated by Tikhonov regularization. The proposed methods demonstrated that the contralateral premotor cortex was preponderantly activated in relation to movement performance.

Conclusions : In cortical dipole source imaging, the PWF has better performance especiallywhen the correlation between the signal and noise is high. The proposed inverse method was applicable to human experiments of MRPs if the signal and noise covariances were obtained.

Keywords

High-resolution EEG - cortical dipole imaging - inverse problem - parametric Weiner filter - signal and noise covariance - movement-related potential
 

  • References

  • 1. He B. Brain Electric Source Imaging - Scalp Laplacian mapping and cortical imaging. Crit Rev BME 1999; 27: 149-188.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2. Nunez P, Silibertein RB, Cdush PJ, Wijesinghe RS, Westdrop AF, Srinivasan R. A theoretical and experimental study of high resolution EEG based on surface Laplacian and cortical imaging. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1994; 90: 40-57.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3. Dale AM, Sereno MI. Improved localization of cortical activity by combining EEG and MEG with MRI cortical surface reconstruction: a linear approach. J Cognitive Neuroscience 1993; 5: 162-176.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4. Hori J, He B. Equivalent dipole source imaging of brain electric activity by means of parametric projection filter. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 2001; 29: 436-445
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5. He B, Yao D, Lian J. High resolution EEG: on the cortical equivalent dipole layer imaging. Clin Neurophysiol 2002; 113: 227-235.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6. He B, Yao D, Wu D. Imaging brain electric activity. In: Lin (ed). Advances in Electromagnetics in Medicine. In press
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7. Mosher JC, Lewis PS, Leahy RM. Multiple dipole modeling and localization from spatio-temporal MEG data. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1992; 39: 541-557.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8. Sekihara K, Poeppel D, Marantz A, Koizumi H, Miyashita Y. Noise covariance incorporated mEg-MUSIC algorithm: A method for multiple-dipole estimation tolerant of the influence of background brain activity. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1997; 44: 839-847.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9. VanVeen BD, Drongelen WV, Yuchtman M, Suzuki A. Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1997; 44: 867-880.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10. Hori J, He B. EEG cortical potential imaging of brain electrical activity by means of parametric projection filters. IEICE Trans Info & Syst 2003; E86-D: 1909-1920.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11. Hori J, Aiba M, He B. Spatio-temporal dipole source imaging of brain electrical activity by means of time-varying parametric projection filter. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2004; 51: 768-777.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12. Philips JW, Leahy RM, Mosher JC. MEG-based imaging of focal neuronal current sources. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1997; 16: 338-348.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13. Grave de Peralta Menendez R, Gonzalez Andino SL. Distributed source models: standard solutions and new developments. In: Uhl C (ed). Analysis of neurophysiological brain functioning, Springer Verlag; 1998: 176-201.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14. Sekihara K, Scholz B. Average-intensity reconstruction and Weiner reconstruction of bioelectric current distribution based on its estimated covariance matrix. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1995; 42: 149-157.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15. Hori J, Lian J, He B. Comparison between parametric Weiner filter and parametric projection filter in cortical equivalent dipole layer imaging. Proc 2nd Joint EMBS/BMES Conf 2002; 929-930.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16. Wang Y, He B. A computer simulation study of cortical imaging from scalp potentials. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1998; 45: 724-35.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17. Gerloff C, Toro C, Uenishi N, Cohen LG, Leocani L, Hallett M. Steady-state movement-related cortical potentials: anew approach to assessing cortical activity associated with fast repetitive finger movements. Electroencephal Clin Neurophysiol 1997; 102: 106-113.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18. Gerloff C, Uenishi N, Nagamine T, Kunieda T, Hallett M, Shibasaki H. Cortical activation during fast repetitive finger movements in humans: steady-state movement-related magnetic fields and their cortical generators. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1998; 109: 444-453.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19. Ni Y, Ding L, Cheng J, Christine K, Lian J, Zhang X, Grusazuskas N, Sweeney J, He B. EEG source analysis of motor potentials induced by fast repetitive unilateral finger movement. Proc 1st IEEE-EMBS Int Conf Neural Eng. 2003
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20. Babiloni F, Babiloni C, Carducci F, Cincotti F, Astolfi L, Basilisco A, Rossini PM, Ding L, Ni Y, Cheng J, Christine K, Sweeney J, He B. Assessing time-varying cortical functional connectivity with the multimodal integration of high resolution EEG and fMRI data by directed transfer function. NeuroImage 2005; 24: 118-131.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21. Boecker H, Kleinschmidt A, Requardt M, Hanicke W, Merboldt KD, Frahm J. Functional cooperativity of human cortical motor areas during self-paced simple finger movements. a high-resolutionMRI study Brain 1994; 117: 1231-1239.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22. Sweeney JA, Mintun MA, Kwee S, Wiseman MB, Brown DL, Rosenberg DR, Carl JR. Positron emission tomography study of voluntary saccadic eye movements and spatial working memory. J Neurophysiol 1996; 75: 454-468.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar