Krankengymnastik zur Behandlung von zentralen Bewegungsstörungen

Zusammenfassung

Das Bobath-Konzept stellt eine weit verbreitete Therapieform in der Neurophysiotherapie dar. Viele der ursprünglichen Annahmen des Ehepaars Bobaths mussten aufgrund von wissenschaftlicher Evidenz revidiert werden. Die physiotherapeutische Praxis sollte in Zukunft mehr an klinischen Leitlinien als an therapeutischen Schulen ausgerichtet sein.

Summary

The Bobath concept is the most popular approach in neurological physical therapy. Many of the original assumptions of the Bobaths have been revised due to magazine evidence. Physical therapy of the future should be more influenced by clinical guidelines than by therapeutic beliefs.

Schlüsselwörter

Physiotherapie - Neurologie - Bobath - evidenzbasiert

Keywords

Physical therapy - neurology - Bobath - evidence based

• Literatur

• 1 Anlage 1a zu den Rahmenempfehlungen nach § 125 Abs. 1 SGB V vom 1. August 2001 in der Fassung vom 1. Juni 2006
• 2 Baert I. et al. Evolution of cardiorespiratory fitness after stroke: a 1-year follow-up study. Influence of prestroke patients’ characteristics and stroke-related factors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012; 93 (04) 669-76.
• 3 Bobath B. Die Hemiplegie Erwachsener. Stuttgart: Thieme; 1973
• 4 Bobath B. Adult hemiplegia: Evaluation and treatment. London: Butterworth-Heinemann Limited; 1990
• 5 Brazzelli M. et al. Physical fitness training for stroke patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; 11: CD003316.
• 6 Brock K. et al. The Bobath concept has changed. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 2002; 48: 156-7.
• 7 Carlisle D. Bobath under fire. Frontline magazine. 2010 16. (1)
• 8 Carr JH, Shepherd RB. Neurological rehabilitation: Optimizing motor performance. 2nd ed.. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2010
• 9 Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Defense and The American Heart Association/ American Stroke Association. The management of stroke rehabilitation. 2010 www.healthquality.va.gov/Management_of_Stroke_Rehabilitation.asp Zugriff am 09.02.2013
• 10 Eckhard G. Posturale Kontrolle und die Bedeutung für das Sturzrisiko für Patienten nach Schlaganfall. Zeitschrift für Physiotherapeuten 2013; 65 (03) 10-8.
• 11 Förster O. Übungstherapie. In: Bumke O, Foerster O. (Hrsg.): Handbuch der Neurologie Band VIII. Allgemeine Therapie. Berlin: Springer; 1936
• 12 French B. et al. Does repetitive task training improve functional activity after stroke? A Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. J Rehabil Med 2010; 42: 9-15.
• 13 Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss. Heilmittelrichtlinie III A Maßnahmen der Physikalischen Therapie – Ziff. 17.A.2.3 veröffentlicht im Bundesanzeiger. 2005 61. 4995, in Kraft getreten am 2. April 2005
• 14 Iosa M. et al. Seven capital devices for the future of stroke rehabilitation. Stroke Res Treat 2012; 201: 187965.
• 15 KNGF. Clinical Practice Guideline for physical therapy in patients with stroke. Supplement to the Dutch Journal of Physical Therapy. 2004 114. (5)
• 16 Kollen BJ et al The effectiveness of the Bobath concept in stroke rehabilitation: what is the evidence? Stroke. 2009; 40 (04) e89-97.
• 17 Lang CE. et al. The brain recovery core: building a system of organized stroke rehabilitation and outcomes assessment across the continuum of care. J Neurol Phys Ther 2011; 35 (04) 194-201.
• 18 Langhammer B. The Bobath concept. A Letter to the editor. Clinical Rehabilitation 2001; 15: 111-3.
• 19 Langhammer B, Stanghelle JK. Can physiotherapy after stroke based on the Bobath concept result in improved quality of movement compared to the motor relearning programme. Physiother Res Int 2011; 16 (02) 69-80.
• 20 Langhammer B, Stanghelle JK. Reply to letter to the editor: concerns about standards of reporting clinical trials: an RCT comparing the Bobath concept and motor relearning interventions for rehabilitation of stroke patients as an exemplar. Physiother Res Int 2012; 17 (04) 244-7.
• 21 Mayston M. Editorial: Bobath concept: Bobath@50: mid-life crisis – what of the future?. Physiotherapy Research International 2006; 11: 183.
• 22 Meadows L. et al. Bobath concept: Theory and clinical practice in neurological rehabilitation. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009
• 23 Mehrholz J. et al. Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; 04: CD006185.
• 24 Mehrholz J. et al. Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving generic activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 06: CD006876.
• 25 Paci M. Physiotherapy based on the Bobath Concept for adults with post-stroke hemiplegia: a review of effectiveness studies. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2003; 35 (01) 2-7.
• 26 Platz T. Roschka Rehabilitative Therapie bei Armparese nach Schlaganfall. Neurologie & Rehabilitation 2009; 02: 81-99.
• 27 Schleichkorn J. The Bobaths. A biography of Berta and Karel Bobath. Tucson, Ariz: Neuro-Developmental Treatment Association; Therapy Skill Builders; 1992
• 28 Sommerfeld DK. et al. Spasticity after stroke: its occurrence and association with motor impairments and activity limitations. Stroke 2004; 35 (01) 134-9.
• 29 Sterr A, Freivogel S. Intensive training in chronic upper limb hemiparesis does not increase spasticity or synergies. Neurology 2004; 63 (11) 2176-7.
• 30 Teasell R. et al. Evidence-based review of stroke rehabilitation: executive summary, 12th edition. Top Stroke Rehabil 2009; 16 (06) 463-88.
• 31 The Fifth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology. European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. et al. European Heart Journal 2012; 33: 1635-701.
• 32 Van Peppen RP. et al. The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what’s the evidence?. Clin Rehabil 2004; 18 (08) 833-62.
• 33 World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva: 2001
• 34 Winstein C. Task-oriented training to promote upper limb recovery. In: Stein J. Stroke recovery and rehabilitation. New York: Demos Medical; 2009.