EKG-Diagnostik von Vorhofflimmern

A. Müssigbrodt; C. Eitel; G. Hindricks; P. Sommer

doi:10.1055/s-0038-1628224

Nervenheilkunde, Table of Contents

Nervenheilkunde 2012; 31(11): 797-803
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1628224

Kompetenzentz Vorhofflimmern

Schattauer GmbH

EKG-Diagnostik von Vorhofflimmern

ECG registration in atrial fibrillation

A. Müssigbrodt

¹Universität Leipzig, Herzzentrum, Abteilung für Rhythmologie

,

C. Eitel

¹Universität Leipzig, Herzzentrum, Abteilung für Rhythmologie

,

G. Hindricks

¹Universität Leipzig, Herzzentrum, Abteilung für Rhythmologie

,

P. Sommer

¹Universität Leipzig, Herzzentrum, Abteilung für Rhythmologie

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Zusammenfassung

Während ältere Untersuchungen einen kausalen Zusammenhang zwischen Vorhofflimmern (VHF) und Schlaganfällen bei nur 10 bis 15% der Patienten fanden, konnte in neueren Arbeiten mit kontinuierlichem Monitoring eine hö-here Prävalenz von mindestens 23% nachgewiesen werden. Aufgrund der therapeutischen Konsequenzen wird dem EKG-Monitoring zur Detektion von VHF bei Patienten mit erhöhtem thromboembolischen Risiko und bei Patienten mit stattgehabter zerebraler Ischämie ungeklärter Ätiologie eine hohe Bedeutung beigemessen. Auch bei Patienten mit Zei-chen einer demenziellen Entwicklung ist das Rhythmusmonitoring zur Detektion von Vorhofflimmern gerechtfertigt. Patienten mit dem Wunsch oder der Notwendigkeit einer an den Bedarf angepassten Antikoagulation können ebenfalls von kontinuierlichem Rhythmusmonitoring profitieren. Bei der Etablierung kontinuierlicher Monitoring-Technologien wird in Zukunft telemedizinischen Abfrageprozessen eine größere Bedeutung zukommen, um die zeitliche Verzögerung bei der ambulanten Nachsorge zu vermeiden.

Summary

Historical studies have found atrial fibrillation in only 10 to 15% of patients with a history of stroke. More recent studies with continuous ECG monitoring have shown a higher percentage of atrial fibrillation in up to 23% of these patients. Due to the potential therapeutic consequences in case of detection of atrial fibrillation, ECG monitoring has gained importance, especially in patients with an increased thromboembolic risk and in patients with stroke of unknown origin. Also in patients with signs of dementia, rhythm monitoring is justified. Patients with the necessity or desire for „on demand“ anticoagulation can benefit from continuous rhythm monitoring. In the future, telemonitoring will have an increased clinical significance in order to avoid diagnostic delays.

Schlüsselwörter

Vorhofflimmern - stummes Vorhofflimmern - Schlaganfall - Demenz - EKG-Monitoring

Keywords

Atrial fibrillation - silent atrial fibrillation - AF burden - stroke - dementia - ECG monitoring

Full Text

References

Literatur
1 Tayal AH. et al. Atrial fibrillation detected by mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry in cryptogenic TIA or stroke. Neurology 2008; 71: 1696-701.
2 Lloyd-Jones DM. et al. Lifetime risk for development of atrial fibrillation: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 2004; 110: 1042-6.
3 Hart RG. et al. Stroke with intermittent atrial fibrillation: incidence and predictors during aspirin therapy. Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2000; 35: 183-7.
4 Hohnloser SH. et al. Incidence of stroke in paroxysmal versus sustained atrial fibrillation in patients taking oral anticoagulation or combined antiplatelet therapy: an ACTIVE W Substudy. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2007; 50: 2156-61.
5 Fuster V. et al. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation): developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation 2006; 114: 257-354.
6 Miyasaka Y. et al. Risk of dementia in stroke-free patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation: data from a community-based cohort. European Heart Journal 2007; 28: 1962-7.
7 Knecht S. et al. Atrial fibrillation in stroke-free patients is associated with memory impairment and hippocampal atrophy. European Heart Journal 2008; 29: 2125-32.
8 Wang TJ. et al. Temporal relations of atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure and their joint influence on mortality: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 2003; 107: 2920-5.
9 Dorian P. et al. Quality of life improves with treatment in the Canadian Trial of Atrial Fibrillation. American Heart Journal 2002; 143: 984-90.
10 Reynolds MR. et al. Influence of age, sex, and atrial fibrillation recurrence on quality of life outcomes in a population of patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation: the Fibrillation Registry Assessing Costs, Therapies, Adverse events and Lifestyle (FRACTAL) study. American Heart Journal 2006; 152: 1097-103.
11 Kim MH. et al. Estimation of total incremental health care costs in patients with atrial fibrillation in the United States. Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes 2011; 4: 313-20.
12 Bruggenjurgen B. et al. The impact of atrial fibrillation on the cost of stroke: the berlin acute stroke study. Value in health: The Journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research 2007; 10: 137-43.
13 Wolowacz SE. et al. The cost of illness of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review of the recent literature. Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology: Journal of the Working Groups on Cardiac Pacing, Arrhythmias, and Cardiac Cellular Electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 2011; 13: 1375-85.
14 Camm AJ. et al. Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: the Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). European Heart Journal 2010; 31: 2369-429.
15 Suissa L, Bertora D, Lachaud S, Mahagne MH. Score for the targeting of atrial fibrillation (STAF): a new approach to the detection of atrial fibrillation in the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke. Stroke 2009; 40: 2866-8.
16 Boriani G. et al. Improving stroke risk stratification using the CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc risk scores in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation by continuous arrhythmia burden monitoring. Stroke 2011; 42: 1768-70.
17 Kirchhof P. et al. Outcome parameters for trials in atrial fibrillation: recommendations from a consensus conference organized by the German Atrial Fibrillation Competence NETwork and the European Heart Rhythm Association. Europace: European Pacing, Arrhythmias, and Cardiac Electrophysiology: Journal of the Working Groups on Cardiac Pacing, Arrhythmias, and Cardiac Cellular Electro-physiology of the European Society of Cardiology 2007; 9: 1006-23.
18 Israel CW. et al. Long-term risk of recurrent atrial fibrillation as documented by an implantable monitoring device: implications for optimal patient care. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2004; 43: 47-52.
19 Verma A. et al. Discerning the incidence of symptomatic and asymptomatic episodes of atrial fibrillation pre- and post-radiofrequency ablation (DISCERN AF): a prospective, multicenter study. Heart Rhythm 2011, Late-Breaking Abstract Session; San Francisco, USA: 2012
20 Fetsch T. et al. Prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardioversion: results of the PAFAC trial. European Heart Journal 2004; 25: 1385-94.
21 Patten M. et al. Event-recorder monitoring in the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation in symptomatic patients: subanalysis of the SOPAT trial. Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology 2006; 17: 1216-20.
22 Hindricks G. et al. Perception of atrial fibrillation before and after radiofrequency catheter ablation: relevance of asymptomatic arrhythmia recurrence. Circulation 2005; 112: 307-13.
23 Schauerte P. et al. Catheter stimulation of cardiac parasympathetic nerves in humans: a novel approach to the cardiac autonomic nervous system. Circulation 2001; 104: 2430-5.
24 Kirchhof P. et al. Early and comprehensive management of atrial fibrillation: proceedings from the 2nd AFNET/EHRA consensus conference on atrial fibrillation entitled ‘research perspectives in atrial fibrillation‘. Europace: European Pacing, Arrhythmias, and Cardiac Electrophysiology : Journal of the Working Groups on Cardiac Pacing, Arrhythmias, and Cardiac Cellular Electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 2009; 11: 860-85.
25 Eitel C, Hindricks G, Piorkowski C. Vorhofflimmern – Neue Aspekte fur Diagnostik und Follow-up. Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie 2009; 20: 173-8.
26 Dagres N. et al. Influence of the duration of Holter monitoring on the detection of arrhythmia recurrences after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: implications for patient follow-up. International Journal of Cardiology 2010; 139: 305-6.
27 Arya A. et al. Clinical implications of various follow up strategies after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology. PACE 2007; 30: 458-62.
28 Jabaudon D. et al. Usefulness of ambulatory 7-day ECG monitoring for the detection of atrial fibrillation and flutter after acute stroke and transient ischemic attack. Stroke 2004; 35: 1647-51.
29 Liao J. et al. Noninvasive cardiac monitoring for detecting paroxysmal atrial fibrillation or flutter after acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review. Stroke 2007; 38: 2935-40.
30 Morris JG, Duffis EJ, Fisher M. Cardiac workup of ischemic stroke: can we improve our diagnostic yield?. Stroke 2009; 40 (08) 2893-8.
31 Rizos T. et al. Detection of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in acute stroke patients. Cerebrovasc Dis 2010; 30 (04) 410-7.
32 Engel JM. et al. Estimation of patient compliance in application of adherent mobile cardiac telemetry device. Conference proceedings: Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Conference 2011; 2011: 1536-9.
33 Stergiou GS. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of a home blood pressure monitor to detect atrial fibrillation. Journal of Human Hypertension 2009; 23: 654-8.
34 Wiesel J, Fitzig L, Herschman Y, Messineo FC. Detection of atrial fibrillation using a modified micro-life blood pressure monitor. American Journal of Hypertension 2009; 22: 848-52.
35 Purerfellner H. et al. Accuracy of atrial tachyarrhythmia detection in implantable devices with arrhythmia therapies. Pacing and Clinical Electro-physiology. PACE 2004; 27: 983-92.
36 Healey JS. et al. Subclinical atrial fibrillation and the risk of stroke. The New England Journal of Medicine 2012; 366: 120-9.
37 Martinek M. et al. New insights into long-term follow-up of atrial fibrillation ablation: full disclosure by an implantable pacemaker device. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology 2007; 18: 818-23.
38 Hindricks G. et al. Performance of a new leadless implantable cardiac monitor in detecting and quantifying atrial fibrillation: Results of the XPECT trial. Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology 2010; 3: 141-7.
39 Eitel C. et al. Performance of an implantable automatic atrial fibrillation detection device: impact of software adjustments and relevance of manual episode analysis. Europace: European Pacing, Arrhythmias, and Cardiac Electrophysiology: Journal of the Working Groups on Cardiac Pacing, Arrhythmias, and Cardiac Cellular Electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 2011; 13: 480-5.
40 Müssigbrodt A, Richter S, Hindricks G, Bollmann A. Vorhofflimmern bei Ausdauersportlern. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Sportmedizin 2010; 61: 190-200.
41 Ricci RP, Morichelli L, Santini M. Remote control of implanted devices through Home Monitoring technology improves detection and clinical management of atrial fibrillation. Europace: European Pacing, Arrhythmias, and Cardiac Electrophysiology: Journal of the Working Groups on Cardiac Pacing, Arrhythmias, and Cardiac Cellular Electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology 2009; 11: 54-61.