Initial Clinical Experience with the IMEX™ Circular External Skeletal Fixation System

Summary

The IMEX™ Circular External Skeletal Fixation (CESF) System was used to treat 10 antebrachial deformities in nine dogs. The mandible of one dog with prognathism was also lengthened. Dogs ranged in age from four to 18 months (mean ± SD: 9 ± four months; median: eight months) and body weight from 2.6 to 46.0 kg (mean ± SD: 23.9 ± 11.2 kg; median: 24.2 kg). Linear distractions were performed with linear motors or threaded rods with paired nylon nuts securing the connecting rods to rings placed between ring blocks. Hinges and angular motors were used to correct angular deformities. A latency period of two to six days and a distraction rate of 1 mm/day, with a twice daily rhythm, were used. Distraction periods ranged from 12 to 32 days (mean ± SD: 21 ± 8 days; median: 25 days). Lengthening achieved ranged from 11 to 40 mm (mean ± SD: 20 ± 9 mm; median: 18 mm) or 6 to 30% (mean ± SD: 15 ± 8%; median: 13%) of the distracted bone’s initial length. All dogs had substantial improvement of their deformity and effective regenerate bone formation. Flexure contracture and wire and pin track inflammation were common complications during the convalescent period. Functional and cosmetic results (direct examination: mean ± SD: 130 ± 65 days; median: 123 days; telephone communication: mean ± SD: 351 ± 133 days; median: 324 days) were assessed as excellent in six, good in three and fair in two dogs and excellent in five, good in four and fair in one dog, respectively. The IMEX™ CESF system allowed precise deformity correction with minimal morbidity which was attributable to the system’s zero tolerance, zero motion properties.

The IMEX™ Circular External Skeletal Fixator System was used to treat antebrachial deformities in nine dogs and to lengthen the mandible of one dog with prognathism. Functional results were assessed as excellent in six dogs, good in three dogs and fair in two dogs. Cosmetic results were assessed as excellent in five dogs, good in four dogs and fair in one dog.

Presented at the 23^rd Annual Conference of the Veterinary Orthopaedics Society, Telluride, CO, USA, March 5, 1996. University of Florida Journal Series #547.

Keywords

Limb deformity - distraction osteogenesis

• REFERENCES

• 1 Aronson J, Shen X. Experimental healing of distraction osteogenesis comparing metaphyseal with diaphyseal sites. Clin Ortho 1994; 301: 25-30.
• 2 ASAMI Group. Basic principles of operative technique. In: Operative Principals of Ilizarov. Bianchi-Maiocchi A, Aronson J. Ed Milan, Italy: Medical Surgical Vido; 1991: 65-72.
• 3 Elkins AD, Morandi M. The Ilizarov ring fixator: Principles, techniques, and uses. In: Textbook of Small Animal, Vol II. Slatter DH. Ed Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1993: 1656-61.
• 4 Elkins AD, Morandi M, Zembo M. Distraction osteogenesis in the dog using the Ilizarov external ring fixator. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1993; 29: 419-26.
• 5 Ferretti A. The application of the Ilizarov technique to veterinary medicine. In: Operative Principals of Ilizarov. Bianchi-Maiocchi A, Aronson J. ed Milan, Italy: Medical Surgical Vido; 1991: 551-70.
• 6 Fox SM. Premature closure of distal radial and ulnar physes in the dog. Part II. Treatment. Compend Cont Educ 1984; 6: 212-22.
• 7 Fox SM, Bray JC, Guerin SR. et al Antebrachial deformities in the dog: Treatment with external fixation. J Small Anim Pract 1995; 36: 315-20.
• 8 Green SA. Harris LN, Wall DM. et al The Rancho Mounting technique for the Ilizarov method. A preliminary report. Clin Ortho 1992; 280: 104-16.
• 9 Hay CW, Manley P. Use of the Wagner apparatus to lengthen the antebrachium of a growing dog. J Small Anim Pract 1996; 37: 543-8.
• 10 Ilizarov GA. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues. Part I. The influence of stability of fixation and softtissue preservation. Clin Ortho 1989; 238: 249-81.
• 11 Ilizarov GA. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissue. Part II. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction. Clin Ortho 1989; 239: 263-85.
• 12 Ilizarov GA. Clinical application of the tension-stress effect for limb lengthening. Clin Ortho 1990; 250: 8-26.
• 13 Ilizarov GA. The apparatus: components and biomechanical principles of application. In: Transosseous Osteosynthesis. Theoretical and Clinical Aspects of the Regeneration and Growth of Tissue. Ilizarov GA. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1992: 63-136.
• 14 Kojimoto H, Yasui J, Goto T. et al Bone lengthening in rabbits by callus distraction. The role of the periosteum and endosteum. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1988; 70B: 543-9.
• 15 Langley-Hobbs SJ, Carmichael S, Pead MJ. et al Management of antebrachial deformity and shortening secondary to a synostosis in a dog. J Small Anim Pract 1996; 37: 359-63.
• 16 Lesser AS. Ilizarov technique, In: Current Techniques in Small Animal. 4th ed. Bojrab MJ. (ed) Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins; 1998: 950-63.
• 17 Lewis DD, Radasch RM, Beale BS. Initial clinical experience with the IMEx™ Circular External Skeletal Fixation System - Part 1: use in fractures and arthrodeses. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1999; 12: 108-17.
• 18 Marcellin-Little DJ, Ferretti A, Roe SC. et al Hinged Ilizarov external fixation for correction of antebrachial deformities. Vet Surg 1998; 27: 231-45.
• 19 Newton CD. Surgical management of distal ulnar physeal growth disturbances in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1974; 164: 479-87.
• 20 Stallings JT, Lewis DD, Welch RD. et al An introduction to distraction osteogenesis and the principles of the Ilizarov method. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1998; 11: 59-67.
• 21 Taylor JC. Geometry of hinge placement. Tech Ortho 1990; 5: 33-9.
• 22 Van Vechten BJ, Vasseur PB. Complications of mid-diaphyseal radial ostectomy performed for treatment of premature closure of the distal radial physis in two dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1993; 202: 97-100.
• 23 Yanoff SR, Hulse DA, Palmer RH. et al Distraction osteogenesis using modified external fixation devices in five dogs. Vet Surg 1992; 21: 480-7.