Biomechanical Evaluation of the Suitability of Monofilament Nylon Fishing and Leader Line for Extra-articular Stabilisation of the Canine Cruciate-deficient Stifle

Summary

The use of monofilament nylon line for extra-articular stabilisation of the cruciate deficient canine stifle is widespread in veterinary surgery. The purpose of this study was twofold: 1) to examine the mechanical behaviour of two forms of monofilament line - standard nylon fishing line (NFL) and nylon leader line (NLL) - when sterilised by steam or ethylene oxide and formed into loops approximating their use in the clinical situation; 2) to compare the mechanical performance of the canine fabellar attachment site to the steel hooks used in the first part of the study.

It was found that NLL loops were not affected by sterilisation and had higher failure loads and stiffness than NFL loops. Further testing of 27-kilo - gram-test (kgt) and 36 kgt steam-sterilised NFL and NLL found that of the materials tested, NLL 27 kgt was most suitable as an extra-articular stabiliser of the canine stifle. The performance of the fabellar attachment site was superior to the steel hooks when cycled to 50 N and inferior when cycled to 100 N.

The suitability of monofilament nylon fishing line (NFL) and monofilament nylon leader line (NLL) for use as lateral fabel-lotibial sutures (LFTS) in canine cranial cruciate ligament repair was investigated. In vitro testing of loops of the materials was performed with steel hook and fabellar attachment points. Twenty-seven-kilogram test NLL was found to be the most suitable nylon line from which to construct an LFTS.

Keywords

Cranial cruciate ligament - monofilament nylon - material properties - biomechanics

• REFERENCES

• 1 Nielsen S. Kinesiology of the knee joint. An experimental investigation of the ligamentous and capsular restraints preventing knee instability. Dan Med Bull 1987; 34 (06) 297-309.
• 2 Bessette GC, Hunter RE. The anterior cruciate ligament. Orthopedics 1990; 13 (05) 551-62.
• 3 DeAngelis M, Lau RE. A lateral retinacular imbrication technique for the surgical correction of anterior cruciate ligament rupture in the dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1970; 157 (01) 79-84.
• 4 Flo GL. Modification of the lateral retinacular imbrication technique for stabilising cruciate ligament injuries. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1975; 11: 570
• 5 Patterson RH, Smith GK, Gregor TP, Newton CD. Biomechanical stability of four cranial cruciate ligament repair techniques in the dog. Vet Surg 1991; 20 (02) 85-90.
• 6 Brinker WO, Piermattei DL. Flo GL. Diagnosis and treatment of orthopedic conditions of the hindlimb. In: Handbook of Small Animal Orthopedics and Fracture Treatment. Brinker WO, Piermattei DL, Flo GL. (eds) Philadelphia: Saunders; 1990: 341-70.
• 7 Vasseur PB. Stifle Joint. In: Textbook of Small Animal Surgery. Slatter D. (ed) Philadelphia: Saunders; 1993: 1817-65.
• 8 Dulish ML. Suture reaction following extraarticular stifle stabilisation in the dog - part I: retrospective study of 161 stifles. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1981; 17: 569-71.
• 9 Olmstead ML. The use of orthopedic wire as a lateral suture for stifle stabilization. Vet Clin North Am (Small Anim Pract) 1993; 23 (04) 735-53.
• 10 Budsberg SC, Verstraete MC, Soutas LR. et al Force plate analyses before and after stabilization of canine stifles for cruciate injury. Am J Vet Res 1988; 49 (09) 1522-4.
• 11 Dobrin PB. Surgical manipulation and the tensile strength of polypropylene sutures. Arch Surg 1989; 124 (06) 665-8.
• 12 Fraunhofer JA, Storey RJ, Masterson BJ. Tensile properties of suture materials. Biomaterials 1988; 9: 324-7.
• 13 Ashford RD. Ashford’s Dictionary of Industrial Chemicals. London: Wavelength Publications Ltd; 1994: 968
• 14 Du-Pont. Tynex Nylon Filaments - material safety data sheet.
• 15 Gerhartz G. (ed) Ullman’s Encylopedia of Industrial Chemistry. 5th ed. Vol. A10 Cambridge: VCH publishers; 1987: 655
• 16 Coetzee GL. An in vitro comparison of two replacement techniques utilizing fascia lata after cranial cruciate ligament transection in the dog. V.C.O.T. 1993; 6: 85-92.
• 17 Bruchman WC, Bolton CW, Bain JR. Design considerations for cruciate ligament prostheses. In: The Anterior Cruciate Deficient Knee, New Concepts in Ligament Repair. St. Louis: Mosby; 1987: 254-72.
• 18 Butler DL, Hulse DA, Kay MD. et al Biomechanics of cranial cruciate ligament reconstruction in the dog. II. Mechanical properties. Vet Surg 1983; 12 (03) 113-8.
• 19 Budsberg SC, Verstraete MC, Soutas LR. Force plate analysis of the walking gait in healthy dogs. Am J Vet Res 1987; 48 (06) 915-8.
• 20 Alexander RM, Jayes AS. Fourier analysis of forces exerted in walking and running. J Biomech 1980; 13: 383-90.
• 21 Cavanagh PR, Lafortune MA. Ground reactions forces in distance running. J Biomech 1980; 13: 397-406.
• 22 Dupuis J, Harari J, Papageorges MC. et al Evaluation of fibular head transposition for repair of experimental cranial cruciate ligament injury in dogs. Vet Surg 1994; 23: 1-12.
• 23 Hulse DA, Butler DL, Kay MD. et al Biomechanics of cranial cruciate ligament reconstruction in the dog. In vitro laxity testing. Vet Surg 1983; 12 (03) 109-12.
• 24 Arms SW, Beynnon B, Fisher RA. The biomechanics of ACL reconstruction in the canine model. In: Proc 33rd Ann Mtg Orthop Res Soc. 1987. (Abstract)
• 25 Vasseur PB, Berry CR. Progression of stifle osteoarthrosis following reconstruction of the cranial cruciate ligament in 21 dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1992; 28 (02) 129-36.
• 26 Elkins AD, Pechman R, Kearney MT, Herron M. A retrospective study evaluating the degree of degenerative joint diseases in the stifle joint of dogs following surgical repair of anterior cruciate ligament rupture. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1991; 27 (05) 533-40.