Lumbar spine stability following hemilaminectomy, pediculectomy, and fenestration

T. P. Hill; A. M. Lubbe; A. J. Guthrie

doi:10.1055/s-0038-1632655

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2000; 13(04): 165-171
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1632655

Original Researcll

Schattauer GmbH

Lumbar spine stability following hemilaminectomy, pediculectomy, and fenestration

Autor*innen

T. P. Hill

¹Department of Companion Animal Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria
A. M. Lubbe

¹Department of Companion Animal Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria
A. J. Guthrie

²The Equine Research Centre, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Republic of South Africa

Abstract

Summary

The destabilising effect of the removal of a single vertebral diarthrosis and the ipsilateral incision of the anuliis fibrosus at two adjacent vertebrae in the canine lumbar spine was quantified in an in vitro study. Lumbar spine segments, from the first to fourth lumbar vertebrae, were harvested from canine cadavers and divided into 1 control group (A) and 3 experimental groups - hemilaminectomy and fenestration (B), pediculectomy and fenestration (C), fenestration alone (D). Samples were subjected to 4 point lateral bending to point of failure. Stiffness, maximum bending moment (Mbmax), angular deformation and bending moment at 15° (Mb at 15°) variables were determined for each group. Hemilaminectomy and fenestration had the greatest decrease in Mbmax, Mb at 15° and stiffness and the greatest increase in angular deformation. Pediculectomy and fenestration and the fenestration alone procedures caused similar and significant reductions in Mb at 15° and stiffness. Pediculectomy was less destabilizing than hemilaminectomy, although this difference was not statistically significant. Fenestration is the common and greatest destabilizing factor. The removal of a single pedicle and accessory process has minimal destabilizing effects.

The destabilizing effect of hemilaminectomy, pediculectomy and fenestration were quantified and compared in a study using canine cadaver spines. The combination of hemilaminectomy and fenestration produced the greatest degree of instability, but fenestration was the shared, most significant, single destabilizing factor.

Keywords

Pediculectomy - spine - biomechanics - stability - canine

Volltext

Referenzen

REFERENCES
1 Bitetto WV, Thatcher C. A modified lateral decompressive technique for treatment of canine intervertebral disc disease. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1987; 23: 409-13.
2 Brown NO, Helphrey ML, Prata RG. Thoracolumbar disk disease in the dog: a retrospective analysis of 187 cases. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1977; 13: 665-72.
3 Butterworth SF, Denny HR. Follow-up study of 100 cases with thoracolumbar disc protrusions treated by lateral fenestration. J Sm Anim Pract 1991; 32: 443-7.
4 Doppman JL, Girton M. Angiographic study of the effect of laminectomy in the presence of acute anterior epidural masses. J Neurosurgery 1976; 45: 195-202.
5 Fingeroth JM. Fenestration Pros and Cons. Prob Vet Med 1989; 03: 446-66.
6 Hoerlein BF. Intervertebral disk disease. In: Veterinary Neurology. Oliver JE, Hoerlein BF, Mayhew IG. (eds). Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1987: 321-41.
7 Jeffrey ND. Treatment of acute and chronic thoracolumbar disc disease by “mini hemilaminectomy “. J Sm Anim Pract 1988; 26: 611-6.
8 Knapp DW, Pope ER, Hewett JE, Bojrab MJ. A retrospective study of thoracolumbar disk fenestration in dogs using a ventral approach: 160 cases (1976 to 1986). J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1990; 26: 543-8.
9 Lubbe AM, Kirberger RM, Verstraete FJM. Pediculectomy for thoracolumbar spinal decompression in the dachshund. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1994; 30: 233-8.
10 Panjabi MM, Lydon C, Vasavada A, Grob D, Crisco III JJ, Dvorak J. On the understanding of clinical instability. Spine 1994; 23: 2642-50.
11 Prata RG. Neurosurgical treatment of thoracolumbar disks: the rationale and value of laminectomy with concomitant disk removal. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1991; 17: 17-26.
12 Schulman A, Lippincott CL. Dorsolateral hemilaminectomy in the treatment of thoracolumbar intervertebral disk disease in dogs. Comp Cont Ed Pract Vet 1987; 09: 305-10.
13 Schulz KS, Waldron DR, Grant JW, Shell L, Smith G, Shires PK. Biomechanics of the thoracolumbar vertebral column of dogs during lateral bending. Am J Vet Res 1996; 57: 1228-32.
14 Shires PK, Waldron DR, Hedlund CS, Blass CE, Massoudi L. A Biomechanical study of rotational instability in unaltered and surgically altered canine thoracolumbar vertebral motion units. Prog Vet Neurol 1991; 02: 6-14.
15 Shores A. Intervertebral disk syndrome in the dog. Part III. Thoracolumbar disk surgery. Comp Cont Ed Pract Vet 1982; 04: 24-31.
16 Smith GK, Walter MC. Spinal decompressive procedures and dorsal compartment injuries: Comparative biomechanical study in canine cadavers. Am J Vet Res 1988; 49: 266-73.
17 Smith GK, Walter MC. Fractures and luxations of the spine. In: Textbook of Small Animal Orthopaedics. Newton CD, Nunamaker DM. (eds). Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Company; 1985: 307-14.
18 Smith GK. Biomechanics pertinent to fracture etiology, reduction, and fixation. In Textbook of Small Animal Orthopaedics. Newton CD, Nunamaker DM. (eds). Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Company; 1985: 195-205.
19 Swaim SF, Vandervelde M. Clinical and histologic evaluation of bilateral hemilaminectomy and deep dorsal laminectomy for extensive spinal cord decompression in the dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1977; 170: 407-13.
20 Vasseur PB, Saunders G, Steinback C. Anatomy and function of the ligaments of the lower cervical spine in the dog. Am J Vet Res 1982; 42: 1002.