Locking Compression Plate fixation of radial and tibial fractures in a young dog

C. S. Schwandt; P. M. Montavon

doi:10.1055/s-0038-1632946

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Table of Contents

Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2005; 18(03): 194-198
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1632946

Case Report

Schattauer GmbH

Locking Compression Plate fixation of radial and tibial fractures in a young dog

Authors

C. S. Schwandt

¹Clinic for Small Animal Surgery of the Vetsuisse Faculty University Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
P. M. Montavon

¹Clinic for Small Animal Surgery of the Vetsuisse Faculty University Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Abstract

Summary

A six-month-old, male Bernese Mountain Dog in which radius-ulna and tibia-fibula concomitant fractures were treated each with a 3.5 mm Locking Compression Plate (LCP) is presented. Both fractures were approached and plated medially. The tibial fracture had to be revised with a 4.5 mm intramedullary nail and a new 3.5 mm LCP at the second post-operative day because of fixation breakdown. The follow-up radiographs taken at days 14 and 53 revealed uneventful healing of both fractures. Implants were removed 53 days after surgery.

Keywords

Dog - LCP - radius - tibia

Full Text

References

References
1 Frigg R. Development ofthe locking compression plate. Injury 2003; 34 Suppl 2 B6-10.
2 Gautier E, Sommer C. Guidelines for the clinical application of the LCP. Injury 2003; 34 Suppl 2 B63-76.
3 Hulse D, Hyman W, Nori M. et al. Reduction in plate strain by addition of an intramedullary pin. Vet Surg 1997; 26 (6) 451-9.
4 Johnson AL. Current concepts in fracture reduction. Vet Comp Orthop Trauma 2003; 16 (2) 59-66.
5 Krettek C. Intramedullary nailing. In: Rued TP, Murphy WM. editors AO principles of fracture management. Stuttgart, New York: Thieme; 2000: 195-219.
6 Perren SM. Backgrounds of the technology of internal fixators. Injury 2003; 34 Suppl 2 B1-3.
7 Perren SM. The concept of biological plating using the limited contact-dynamic compression plate (LC-DCP). Scientific background, design and application. Injury 1991; 22 Suppl 1 1-41.
8 Perren SM. Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures. The scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002; 84 (8) 1093-110.
9 Perren SM, Boitzy A. Cellular differentiation and bone biomechanics during consolidation of a fracture. Anatomia Clinica 1978; 1 (1) 13-28.
10 Rahn BA. Bone healing: histological and physiological concepts. In: Sumner-Smith G. ed Bone in clinical orthopedics. New York: 2002: 287-325.
11 Roe S. Internal fracture fixation. In: Slatter D. editor Small Animal Surgery. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2003: 1798-818.
12 Sardinas JC, Montavon PM. Use of amedial bone plate for repair of radius and ulna fractures in dogs and cats: a report of 22 cases. Vet Surg 1997; 26 (2) 108-13.
13 Savoldelli D, Montavon PM. PC-Fix clinical handling – small animals. Injury 1995; 26 Suppl 2 Sb47-Sb50.
14 Schutz M, Sudkamp NP. Revolution in plate osteosynthesis: new internal fixator systems. J Orthop Sci 2003; 8 (2) 252-8.
15 Stoffel K, Dieter U, Stachowiak G. et al. Biomechanical testing of the LCP--how can stability in locked internal fixators be controlled?. Injury 2003; 34 Suppl 2 B11-9.
16 Tepic S, Perren SM. The biomechanics of the Pc-Fix internal fixator. Injury 1995; 26 Suppl 2 Sb5-Sb10.
17 Wilson JW. Blood supply to developing, mature and healing bone. In: Sumner-Smith G. ed Bone in clinical orthopedics. New York: 2002: 23-116.