Review of the literature

Summary

Elbow incongruity is the term to describe bad alignment of the joint surfaces of the elbow. Two features illustrate incongruity of the elbow: an abnormal shape of the ulnar trochlear notch and a step between the radius and ulna, caused by either a short radius or a short ulna. It has been suggested that both an elliptical notch, and a step, can cause increased local pressure within the joint, resulting in loose fragments at different locations: ununited anconeal process (UAP), fragmented coronoid process (FCP), osteochondritis dissecans of the humeral condyle (OCD). These lesions are grouped under the term ‘elbow dysplasia’ and are the most frequent causes of front leg lameness in the dog. Although several radiographic features to diagnose incongruity have been described, the ‘scoring’ of incongruity is subjective because there is currently no objective method to measure the degree of incongruity. Because superimposition is avoided, CT is suggested as a standard technique to measure incongruity. Arthroscopy on the other hand, allows the direct visualisation of the intra-articular structures and their abnormalities. Information on both techniques are still relatively new. Several surgical techniques have been proposed to restore joint congruity; the one most frequently used is an ulnar osteotomy. But because of possible complications, other techniques are being developed. Reports evaluating the results of the different techniques are not yet available.

Keywords

Elbow incongruity - literature - scoring - diagnosis - dysplasia

• References

• 1 Brünnberg L. et al. Computergestützte Auswertung von Röntgenbildern zur Erfassung von Parametern der Ellbogengelenksdysplasie. Teil 2: Stufenbildungen im Gelenk. Kleintierpraxis 1999; 44: 637-46.
• 2 Collins KE. et al. Comparison of radius of curvature of the ulnar trochlear notch of Rottweilers and Greyhounds. Am J Vet Res 2001; 62: 968.
• 3 Gielen Ietal. Canine elbow incongruity evaluated with computerised tomography (CT), radiography and arthroscopy. Proceedings 8th annual EAVDI Conference. 2001 p 22.
• 4 Kirberger RM. et al. Elbow dysplasia in the dog: pathophysiology, diagnosis and control. J S Air VetAssoc 1998; 69: 43-54.
• 5 Mason DR. et al. Sensitivity of radiographic evaluation of radio-ulnar incongruence in the dog in vitro . Vet Surg 2002; 31: 125-32.
• 6 Preston CA. et al. In vitro determination of contact areas in the normal elbowjoints of dogs. Am J Vet Res 2000; 61: 1315-21.
• 7 Viehmann B. et al. Computergestützte Auswertung von Röntgenbildern zur Erfassung von Parametern der Ellbogengelenksdysplasie. Teil 1: Incisuratrochlearisulnae. Kleintierpraxis 1999; 44: 595-606.
• 8 Wind AP. Elbow inconguity and developmental elbowdiseasesinthedog: Part i. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1986; 22: 712-24.
• 9 Morgan JP, Wind A. Osteochondroses, hip dysplasia, elbow dysplasia. In: Hereditary bone and joint diseases in the dog. Hanover: Schlütersche GmbH & Co; 1999: 41-94.
• 10 Sjöström L. et al. Ununited anconeal process in the dog. Pathogenesis and treatment by osteotomy of the ulna. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1995; 8: 170-6.
• 11 Eckstein F. et al. Morphomechanics of the humero-ulnar joint: I. Joint space width and contact areas as a function of load and flexion angle. Anat Rec 1995; 243: 318-26.
• 12 Brinker WO. et al. Correction of abnormal bone growth and healing. In: WB. Saunders (editors). Small animal orthopedics and fracture repair, 3 rd ed., Philadelphia 1997; 686-712.
• 13 Macpherson GC. et al. Fragmented coronoid process associated with premature distal radial physial closure in four dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1994; 5: 93-9.
• 14 Wind AP. et al. Elbow inconguity and developmental elbow diseases in the dog: Part II. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1986; 22: 725-30.
• 15 Van Sickle DC. A comparative study of the postnatal elbow development of the Greyhound and the German Shepherd dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1966; 147: 1650.
• 16 Olsson NC. et al. Asynchronous growth of the canine radius and ulna: Surgical correction following experimental premature closure of the distal radial physis. Vet Surg 1981; 10: 125-31.
• 17 Preston CA. et al. In vitro experimental study of the effect of radial shortening and ulnar ostectomy on contact patterns in the elbowjoint of dogs. Am JVet Res 2000; 62: 1548-56.
• 18 Körbel J. et al. CT-Osteoabsorptiometry in dogs with elbow diseases. 10“ ESVOT Congress, Munich: 2000. p 91-2.
• 19 Fujita Y. et al. Effect ofhumeral osteotomy onjoint surface contact in canine elbow joints. Am J Vet Res 2003; 64: 506-11.
• 20 Hazewinkel HAW. et al. Onderzoek en behandeling van het losse processus coronoideus medialis bij de hond. Vl. Diergeneesk. Tijdschr 1980; 111: 1234-45.
• 21 Keller GG. et al. Correlation of radiographic, necropsy and histologic findings in 8 dogs with elbow dysplasia. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1997; 38: 272-6.
• 22 Snaps FR. et al. Comparison of radiography, magnetic resonance imaging, and surgical findings in dogs with elbow dysplasia. Am J Vet Res 1997; 58: 1367-70.
• 23 Murphy ST. et al. Effect of radiographic positioning on interpretation of cubital joint congruity in dogs. Am J ofVet Res 1998; 59: 1351-7.
• 24 Ljunggren G. Osteochondrosis of the schoulder and elbowjoints in the dog. A radiographic and pathological study JAmVetRadiol Soc 1973; 14: 5.
• 25 Reichle JK. et al. Computed Tomographic findings of dogs with cubital joint lameness. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2000; 41: 125-30.
• 26 Schulz K. Analysis of congruency using radiography and CT. Proceedings, ECVS Congress 2000; pp. 12-3.
• 27 Carpenter LG. et al. Comparison of radiologic imaging techniques for diagnosis of fragmented medial coronoid process of the cubital joint in dogs. JAmVet Med Assoc 1993; 203: 78-83.
• 28 Hornof WJ. et al. Canine elbow dysplasia. The early radiographic detection of fragmentation of the coronoid process. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2000; 30: 257-67.
• 29 Van Ryssen B. Role of arthroscopy in elbow diseases in the dog. Proceedings 12th International Small Animal Arthroscopy workshop, refresher course. 2001. University of Ghent; Belgium.:
• 30 Read RA. et al. Fragmentation of the medial coronoid process of the ulna in dogs: a study of 109 cases. J Small Anim Pract 1990; 31: 330-4.
• 31 Meyer-Lindenberg A. et al. Short- and long-term results after surgical treatment of an ununited anconeal process in the dog. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2001; 14: 101-10.
• 32 Bardet JF. et al. La fragmentation du processus coronoide chez le chien. Prat Med Chir Anim 1996; 31: 451-63.
• 33 Ness MG. Treatment of fragmented coronoid process in young dogs by proximal ulnar osteotomy. J Small Anim Pract 1998; 39: 15-8.
• 34 Vezzoni et al. Surgical treatment of elbow dysplasia: technique and follow-up. Proceedings 13th Annual Meeting IEWG, Granada, 2nd Oct 2002; 18-24.
• 35 Thomson MJ. et al. Osteochondrosis of the elbow: A review of the pathogenesis and anew approach to treatment. Aust Vet J 1995; 72: 375-8.
• 36 Krotscheck U. et al. Ununited anconeal process: lag-screw fixation with proximal ulnar osteotomy. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2000; 13: 212-6.
• 37 Slocum B. et al. Radius elongation for pressure relief of the coronoid process of the ulna. Proceedings 12th ESVOT Congress, Munich 2004; 259.
• 38 Puccio M. et al. Clinical evaluation and long term follow-up of dogs having coronoidectomy for elbow dysplasia. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2003; 39: 473-8.