Use of the ComPact UniLock System for ventral stabilization procedures of the cervical spine

Summary

This study evaluates clinical application of the ComPact UniLock™ system^a for ventral stabilization of the cervical spine. Patient material included 13 consecutive cases, 12 dogs and one cat, with cervical spinal instabilities secondary to disc-associated wobbler syndrome (six dogs), traumatic, iatrogenic, and disc-associated cervical spinal instability of small dogs (four cases), cervical spinal fractures (one dog and one cat), and congenital atlantoaxial instability (one dog). The 2.0 system was used in smaller patients and the 2.4 system was applied in large dogs. Implant failure was observed on follow-up radiographs in one dog with a healed C2 fracture and screw pullout occurred in one dog with caudal cervical spondylomyelopathy, necessitating revision surgery. Implants remained stable throughout the follow-up period in the other cases. ‘Good’ or ‘ excellent’ clinical outcome was achieved in 12 patients, including the dog with revision surgery. One dog had to be euthanatized due to postoperative deterioration of neurological status and development of pneumonia. The ComPact UniLock system was found to be a suitable implant for treating cervical instabilities of different origin in both small and large patients with lesions from C1/C2 to C6/C7. Some problems were encountered in the dogs with disc-associated Wobbler syndrome, such as lack or slow rate of vertebral fusion and partial collapse of the distracted intervertebral space on follow-up radiographs. A lack of adequate fusion was most likely related to grafting techniques used.

Keywords

Unilock - cervical spine

• References

• 1 Bergman RL. Cervical spondylomyelopahty in the dog: A comparison to the disease in humans. ACVIM Proceedings 2004; 17-20.
• 2 Blass CE, Waldron DR, VanEe RT. Cervical stabilization in three dogs using Steinmann pins and methylmethacrylate. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1988; 24: 61-8.
• 3 Bruecker KA, Seim HB, Withrow SJ. Clinical evaluation of three surgical methods for treatment of caudal cervical spondylomyelopathy of dogs. Vet Surg 1989; 18: 197-203.
• 4 Bruecker KA, Seim HB, Blass CE. Caudal cervical spondylomyelopathy: Decompression by linear traction and stabilization with Steinmann pins and polymethylmethacrylate. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1989; 25: 677-83.
• 5 Denny HR, Gibbs C, Waterman A. Atlantoaxial subluxation in the dog: a review of thirty cases and an evaluation of treatment by lag screw fixation. J Small Anim Pract 1988; 29: 37-47.
• 6 Ellison GW, Seim HB, Clemmons RM. Distracted cervical spinal fusion for management of caudal cervical spondylomyelopathy in large-breed dogs. JAmVet Med Assoc 1988; 193: 447-53.
• 7 Fitch RB, Kerwin SC, Hosgood G. Caudal cervical intervertebral disk disease in the small dog: Role of distraction and stabilization in ventral slot decompression. JAmAnim Hosp Assoc 2000; 36: 68-74.
• 8 Huibregtse BA, Smith CW, Bennett DF. Atlantoaxial luxation in a Doberman Pinscher. Canine Practice 1992; 17: 7-10.
• 9 Hurov L. Congenital atlantoaxial malformation and acute subluxation in amature Basset hound -surgical treatment by wire stabilization. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1979; 15: 177-80.
• 10 Keller M, Voss K, Montavon PM. The ComPact UniLock 2.0/2.4TM system and its clinical application in small animal orthopedics. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2005; 18: 83-89.
• 11 Lemarie RJ. et al. Vertebral subluxation following ventral cervical decompression in the dog. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2000; 36: 348-58.
• 12 Lindquist C. et al. A comparative study on four screw-plate locking systems in sheep: A clinical and radiological study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001; 30: 160-6.
• 13 McKee WM, Lavelle RB, Richardson JL. et al. Vertebral distraction-fusion for cervical spondylopathy using a screw and double washer technique. J Small Anim Pract 1990; 31: 22-7.
• 14 Pitzen T. et al. Screw fixation to the posterior corticalshell does not influence peak torque and pull-out in anterior cervical plating. Eur Spine J 2002; 11: 494-9.
• 15 Platt SR, Chambers JN, Cross A. Amodified ventral fixation for surgical management of atlantoaxial subluxation in 19 dogs. Vet Surg 2004; 33: 349-54.
• 16 Read RA. Occipitoatlantoaxial malformation in a dog. Austral College Vet Scientists 1988; 29: 4.
• 17 Richman JD. et al. Biomechanical evaluation of cervical spine stabilization methods using a porcine model. Spine 1995; 20: 2192-7.
• 18 Rochat MC, Shores A. Fixation of an atlantoaxial subluxation by use of cannulated screws. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1999; 11: 43-6.
• 19 Rusbridge C. et al. Comparison of two surgical techniques for the management of cervical spondylomyelopathy in dobermanns. J Small AnimPract 1998; 39: 425-31.
• 20 Schulz KS, Waldron DR, Fahie M. Application of ventral pins and polymethylmethacrylate for the management of atlantoaxial instability: results in nine dogs. Vet Surg 1997; 26: 317-25.
• 21 Sharp NJH, Wheeler SJ. Cervical spondylomyelopathy. In: Small Animal Spinal Disorders. Sharp NJH, Wheeler SJ. (eds) London: Mosby-Wolfe; 2005: 211-45.
• 22 Smith SA. et al. An in-vitro biomechanical comparison of the Orosco and AO locking plates for anterior cervical spine fixation. J Spinal Disorders 1995; 8: 220-3.
• 23 Stead AC, Anderson AA, Coughlan A. Bone plating to stabilize atlantoaxial subluxation in four dogs. J Small Anim Pract 1993; 34: 462-8.
• 24 Thomas WB, Sorjonen DC, Simpson ST. Surgical management of atlantoaxial subluxation in 23 dogs. Vet Surg 1991; 20: 409-12.
• 25 Voss K, Keller M, Montavon PM. Internal splinting of dorsal intertarsal and tarsometatarsal instabilities in dogs and cats with the ComPact UniLock 2.0/2.4 System. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2004; 17: 125-30.
• 26 Wheeler SJ. Atlantoaxial subluxation with absence of the dens in a Rottweiler. J Small Anim Pract 1992; 33: 90-3.
• 27 Wheeler SJ, Sharp NJH. Caudal cervical spondylomyelopahy. In: Small Animal Spinal Disorders, Wheeler SJ, Sharp NJH (eds). London: Mosby-Wolfe 2000; 135-54.