The measurement of ground reaction force in dogs trotting on a treadmill

Summary

We studied the time necessary to obtain reliable kinetic data from healthy dogs trotting on a treadmill. Ten adult male Malinois Belgian Shepherd dogs were made to trot on an instrumented treadmill to record the ground reaction force for the entire body and to determine the vertical force variables (peak [PFz], impulse [IFz], stride time [Str], peak time [Tz] and contact time [Ct]). Data were collected from each dog, during three sequences per day, on three consecutive days. In order to determine the contribution of the ‘sequence’, ‘day of measurement’, and ‘dog’ factors and the percentage of variance attributable to dogs, data were analyzed with a linear mixed model. The curve shapes were similar to those obtained with a floor-mounted force platform. Intra-dog coefficients of variation were between 1.57 and 3.46%. Inter-dog coefficients of variation were between 4.18 and 7.82%. A sequence effect was not noted. Each day had a significant effect on all of the data. All variables differed significantly from the first day compared to the other days. However there was not any difference between days 2 and 3. The percentage of the total variance attributable to dogs ranged from 37 to 88%. The coefficients of variation were lower than those obtained with common protocols. The treadmill locomotion remained consistent during a single session. Even if interday variation needs to be accounted for, reliable data can still be obtained after a single training session. The majority of the variation was attributable to the dog. An instrumented treadmill may be used for kinetic analysis.

Keywords

Kinetics - dog - treadmill - habituation - gait analysis

• References

• 1 Budsberg SC. et al. Evaluation of limb symmetry indices, using ground reaction forces in healthy dogs. Am J Vet Res 1993; 54: 1569-74.
• 2 Budsberg SC. et al. Vertical loading rates in clinically normal dogs at a trot. Am J Vet Res 1995; 56: 1275-80.
• 3 Budsberg SC. et al. Force plate analysis of the walking gait in healthy dogs. Am J Vet Res 1987; 48: 915-8.
• 4 Rumph PF. et al. Ground reaction force profiles from force platform gait analyses of clinically normal mesomorphic dogs at the trot. Am J Vet Res 1994; 55: 756-61.
• 5 Budsberg SC. et al. Effects of acceleration on ground reaction forces collected in healthy dogs at a trot. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1999; 12: 15-9.
• 6 Jevens DJ. et al. Contributions to variance in forceplate analysis of gait in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1993; 54: 612-5.
• 7 MC Laughlin RM, Roush JK. Effects of subject stance time and velocity on ground reaction forces in clinically normal Greyhounds at the trot. Am J Vet Res 1994; 55: 1666-71.
• 8 Renberg WC. et al. Comparison of stance time and velocity as control variables in force plate analysis of dogs. Am JVet Res 1999; 60: 814-9.
• 9 Riggs CM. et al. Effects of subject velocity on force plate-measured ground reaction forces in healthy Greyhounds at the trot. Am J Vet Res 1993; 57: 1523-6.
• 10 Decamp CE. Kinetic and kinematic gait analysis and the assessment of lameness in the dog. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1997; 27: 825-40.
• 11 Mclaughlin RM. Kinetic and kinematic gait analysis in dogs. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2001; 31: 193-201.
• 12 Anderson MA. Force plate analysis: A non invasive tool for gait evaluation. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1994; 16: 857-867.
• 13 Bertram JEA. et al. Comparison of the trotting gaits ofLabrador Retrievers and Greyhounds. Am J Vet Res 2000; 61: 832-8.
• 14 Bertram JEA. et al. Multiple force platform analysis of the canine trot; a new approach to assessing basic characteristics of locomotion. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1997; 10: 160-9.
• 15 Lee DV. et al. Acceleration and balance in trotting dogs. J Exp Biol 1999; 202: 3565-73.
• 16 Masani K. et al. Variability of ground reaction forces during treadmill walking. J Appl Physiol 2002; 92: 1885-90.
• 17 Schieb DA. Kinematic accommodation of novice treadmill runners. ResQExerc Sport 1986; 57: 1-7.
• 18 Wall JC. et al. The process of habituation to treadmill walking at different velocities. Ergonomics 1981; 24: 531-42.
• 19 Back W. et al. Kinematic differences between the distal portions of the forelims and hind limbs of horses at the trot. AmJVetRes 1995; 56: 1522-8.
• 20 Fredricson I. et al. Treadmill for equine locomotion analysis. Equine VetJ 1983; 15: 111-5.
• 21 Weishaupt MA. et al. Instrumented treadmill for measuring vertical ground reaction forces in horses. AmJVet Res 2002; 63: 520-7.
• 22 Buchner HH. et al. Kinematics of treadmill versus overground locomotion in horses. Vet Q 1994; 16 Suppl 2 S87-90.
• 23 White SC. et al. Comparison of vertical ground reaction forces during overground and treadmill walking. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998; 10: 1537-42.
• 24 Buchner HH. et al. Habituation of horses to treadmill locomotion. Equine vet J Suppl 1994; 17: 13-5.
• 25 SAS user's guide: statistics, version 5 ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 1985
• 26 Rumph PF. et al. Effects of selection and habituation on vertical ground reaction force in Greyhounds. Am JVet Res 1997; 58: 1206-8.
• 27 Rumph PF. et al. Interday variation in vertical ground reaction force in clinically normal Greyhounds at the trot. Am. J Vet Res 1999; 60: 679-83.