Methods Inf Med 2004; 43(03): 296-301
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1633871
Original Article
Schattauer GmbH

Comparison of Closed-loop and Open-loop Models in the Assessment of Cardiopulmonary and Baroreflex Gains

R. Takalo
1   Division of Nuclear Medicine, Dept. of Clinical Chemistry, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
,
J. P. Saul
2   The Children’s Heart Program of South Carolina, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
,
I. Korhonen
3   VTT Information Technology, Tampere, Finland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
05 February 2018 (online)

Summary

Objectives: Both open- and closed-loop models of beat-to-beat cardiovascular control have been suggested. We tested whether the modelling yields different results with real data while assessing cardiopulmonary and baroreflex gains.

Methods: Two autoregressive models are described to resolve causal relationships between systolic blood pressure (SBP), RR-interval (RRI) and instantaneous lung volume (ILV): a closed-loop model which takes into account both the RRI changes induced by changes in SBP and the SBP changes mediated by changes in RRI, and an open-loop model which does not have a link from RRI to SBP. The performance of the models was compared in 14 healthy men in supine and standing positions under control conditions and under conditions of β-sympathetic and parasympathetic pharmacological blockades. Transfer function gains were computed from ILV to RRI (cardiopulmonary gain) and from SBP to RRI (baroreflex gain). The measurements were done under controlled random-interval breathing.

Results: The gains identified by the open-loop model tended to be higher than those from the closed-loop model, but the differences did not reach statistical significance. Importantly, the two models discriminated the changes in transfer gains between different interventions equally well.

Conclusions: Because the interactions between SBP and RRI occur physiologically in a closed-loop condition, the closed-loop model provides a theoretical advantage over the open-loop model. However, in practise, it seems to be little reason to select one over the other due to methodological errors when estimating cardiopulmonary or baroreflex transfer gains.

 
  • References

  • 1 Parati G, Di Rienzo M, Mancia G. How to measure baroreflex sensitivity: from the cardiovascular laboratory to daily life. J Hypertens 1999; 18: 7-19.
  • 2 O’Leary DD, Lin DC, Hughson RL. Determination of baroreflex gain using auto-regressive moving-average analysis during spontaneous breathing. Clin Phys 1999; 19: 369-77.
  • 3 Lucini D, Porta A, Milani O, Baselli G, Pagani M. Assessment of arterial and cardiopulmonary baroreflex gains from simultaneous recordings of spontaneous cardiovascular and respiratory variability. J Hypertens 2000; 18: 281-6.
  • 4 Akselrod S, Gordon D, Madwed JB, Snidman NC, Shannon DC, Cohen RJ. Hemodynamic regulation: investigation by spectral analysis. Am J Physiol 1985; 249: H867-H875.
  • 5 Baselli G, Cerutti S, Civardi S, Malliani A, Pagani M. Cardiovascular variability signals: towards identification of a closed-loop model of the neural control mechanisms. IEEE T-BME 1988; 35: 1033-46.
  • 6 Mullen TJ, Appel ML, Kukkamala R, Mathias JM, Cohen RJ. System identification of closedloop cardiovascular control: effects of posture and autonomic blockade. Am J Physiol 1997; 272: H448-H461.
  • 7 Triedman JK, Perrott MH, Cohen RJ, Saul JP. Respiratory sinus arrhythmia: time domain characterization using autoregressive moving average analysis. Am J Physiol 1995; 268: H2232-H2238.
  • 8 Perrot MH, Cohen RJ. An efficient approach to ARMA modeling of biological systems with multiple inputs and delays. IEEE T-BME 1996; 43: 1-14.
  • 9 Barbieri R, Parati P, Saul JP. Closed-versus open-loop assessment of heart rate baroreflex: Implications for normal and abnormal blood pressure regulation and non-invasive assessment. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 2001; 20: 33-42.
  • 10 Porta A, Baselli G, Rimoldi O, Malliani A, Pagani M. Assessing baroreflex gain from spontaneous variability in conscious dogs: role of causality and respiration. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2000; 279: H2558-H2567.
  • 11 Korhonen I, Takalo R, Turjanmaa V. Multivariate autoregressive model with immediate transfer paths for assessment of interactions between cardio-pulmonary variability signals. Med Biol Eng Comp 1996; 34: 199-206.
  • 12 Korhonen I. Multivariate closed-loop model with non-causal respiratory input for the analysis of cardiovascular dynamics. Meth Inform Med 1997; 36: 264-7.
  • 13 Saul JP, Berger RD, Chen MH, Cohen RJ. Transfer function analysis of autonomic regulation II. Respiratory sinus arrhythmia. Am J Physiol 1989; 256: H153-H161.
  • 14 Saul JP, Berger RD, Albrecht P, Stein SP, Chen MH, Cohen RJ. Transfer function analysis of the circulation: unique insights into cardiovascular regulation. Am J Physiol 1991; 261: H1231-H1245.
  • 15 Jose AD, Taylor RR. Autonomic blockade by propranolol and atropine to study intrinsic myocardial function in man. J Clin Invest 1969; 48: 2019
  • 16 Patton DJ, Triedman JK, Perrott MH, Vidian AA, Saul JP. Baroreflex gain: characterization using autoregressive movin average analysis. Am J Physiol 1996; 270: H1240-H1249.
  • 17 Desai TH, Collins JC, Snell M. Mosqueda-Garcia R Modelling of arterial and cardiopulmonary baroreflex control of heart rate. Am J Physiol 1997; 272: H2343-H2352.
  • 18 Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Circulation 1996; 93: 1043-65.
  • 19 Scher AM, O’Leary DS, Sheriff DD. Arterial baroreceptor regulation of peripheral resistance resistance and of cardiac performance. In: Baroreceptor reflexes: Integrative Functions and Clinical Aspects. Eckberg DL, Sleight P. (eds.) Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg: 1991: 75-125.
  • 20 Legramante JM, Raimondi G, Massaro M, Cassarino S, Peruzzi G, Iellamo F. Investigating feed-forward neural regulation of circulation from analysis of spontaneous arterial pressure and heart rate fluctuations. Circulation 1999; 99: 1760-6.
  • 21 Eckberg DL, Sleight P. Human baroreflexes in health and disease. Clarendon Press; Oxford, UK: 1992: 209-54.
  • 22 Elghozi J-L, Laude D, Girard A. Effects of respiration on blood pressure and heart rate variability in humans. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 1991; 18: 735-42.
  • 23 Toska K, Eriksen M. Respiratory-synchronous fluctuations in stroke volume, heart rate and arterial pressure in humans. J Physiol 1993; 472: 501-12.
  • 24 Taylor JA, Eckberg DL. Fundamental relations between short-term RR interval and arterial blood-pressure oscillations in humans. Circulation 1996; 93: 1527-32.
  • 25 Seller H, Langhorst P, Richter D, Koepchen HP. Über die Abhängigkeit der pressoreceptorischen Hemmung des Sympathicus von der Atemphase und ihre Auswirkung in der Vasomotorik. Pflügers Arch 1968; 302: 300-14.
  • 26 Dornhorst AC, Howard P, Leathart GL. Respiratory variations in blood pressure. Circulation 1952; 6: 553-8.
  • 27 Kalli S, Suoranta R, Jokipii M. Applying a multivariate autoregressive model to describe interactions between blood pressure and heart rate. In: Measurement in clinical medicine. The institute of measurement and control, London. 1986: 77-82.
  • 28 Barbieri R, Bianchi AM, Triedman JK, Mainardi LT, Cerutti S, Saul JP. Model dependency of multivariate autoregressive spectral analysis. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 1997; 16: 74-85.
  • 29 Pickering TG, Gribbin B, Petersen ES, Cunningham DJC, Sleight P. Effects of autonomic blockade on the baroreflex on man at rest and during exercise. Circ Res 1972; 30: 177-85.