Methods Inf Med 2003; 42(04): 353-359
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634229
Original article
Schattauer GmbH

Images of Health Technology in National and Local Strategies

T. Cornford
1   Department of Information Systems, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
,
E. Klecun-Dabrowska
1   Department of Information Systems, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
08 February 2018 (online)

Summary

Objectives: This paper examines the potential of various models relating technology to society and institutional structures to inform health policy. Among the models discussed are various versions of technological determinism, social constructivism, actor network theory and critical theory.

Methods: The paper considers recent developments in policy and strategy that aim to shape the way the UK’s National Health Service (NHS) integrates Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) into health care and considers what these alternative models highlight or emphasise, and how they might influence the activities of setting local implementation strategies.

Results and Conclusions: Contemporary ICTs are often presented as having a particular relevance and power in reforming or transforming the delivery of health care. Understanding how such technologies might be conceived of, implemented and become an integral part of some future health care system is an important and challenging task that requires innovative theoretical treatments.

 
  • References

  • 1 DOH. The new NHS, modern, dependable. London: HMSO; 1997
  • 2 NHS Executive. Information for health: an information strategy for the modern NHS 1998-2005. Leeds. 1998
  • 3 DOH. The NHS Plan – The command paper 4818-1. HMSO; 2000
  • 4 Anderson JG, Stephen JJ. Use and impact of computers in clinical medicine. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1987
  • 5 Doolin B. Sociotechnical networks and information management in health care. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies 1999; 9: 95-114.
  • 6 Kaplan B. Social interactionist framework for Information Systems Studies: The 4Cs. In: IFIP WG8.2 & WG8.6 Joint Working Conference on Information Systems: Current Issues and Future Changes. 1998. 10-13 December; Helsinki; 1998, pp. 327-340.
  • 7 Mumford E. Designing human systems for health care: the ETHICS Method. Stockton Heath, Cheshire: Eight Associates; 1993
  • 8 Sheaff R, Peel V. editors. Managing health service information systems: an introduction. Buckingham, Philadelphia: Open University Press; 1995
  • 9 Raghutathi W. Health care information systems. Communications of the ACM 1997; 40 (Suppl. 08) 81-2.
  • 10 Anderson JG. Clearing the way for physician‘s use of clinical information systems. Communications of the ACM 1997; 40 (Suppl. 08) 83-90.
  • 11 Rindfleisch TC. Privacy, information technology, and health care. Communications of the ACM 1997; 40 (Suppl. 08) 93-100.
  • 12 Hughes TP. The seamless web: technology, science, etcetera, etcetera. Social Studies of Science 1986; 16: 281-92.
  • 13 Hughes TP. The evolution of large technological systems. In: Bijker WE, Hughes TP, Pinch T. editors. The social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 1987
  • 14 Callon M. Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In: Law J. editor. Power, action and belief. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1986. pp. 196-233.
  • 15 Latour B. Science in action. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 1987
  • 16 Bijker WE, Law J. editors. Shaping technology/ building society, studies in sociotechnical change. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 1992
  • 17 Bijker WE, Hughes TP, Pinch TJ. editors. The social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 1987
  • 18 MacKenzie D, Wajcman J. editors. The social shaping of technology: how the refrigerator got its hum. Milton Keynes: Open University Press; 1985
  • 19 Williams R, Edge D. The social shaping of technology. In: Dutton WH, Peltu M. editors. Information and communication technologies: visions and realities. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1996
  • 20 Deuten JJ, Rip A. Narrative infrastructure in product creation proceses. Organisation 2000; 7 (Suppl. 01) 69-93.
  • 21 Pinch TJ, Bijker WE, Hughes TP. editors. The social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 1987
  • 22 Bijker WE. Of bicycles, bakelites, and bulbs: toward a theory of sociotechnical change. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 1997
  • 23 Monteiro E. Actor-Network Theory and information infrastructure. In: Ciborra CU. editor. From control to drift: the dynamics of corporate information infrastructures. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000
  • 24 Cooper G, Woolgar S. Software is society made malleable: the importance of conceptions of audience in software and research practice. PICT policy research papers. Swindon: Economic and Social Research Council; 1993. Report no. 25.
  • 25 Woolgar S. Technologies as cultural artefacts. In: Dutton WH, Peltu M. editors. Information and communication technologies: visions and realities. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1996
  • 26 Orlikowski WJ. Using technology and constituting structures: a practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science 2000; 11 (Suppl. 04) 404-28.
  • 27 Button G. The curious case of the vanishing technology. In: Button G. editor. Technology in working order: studies of work, interaction, and technology. London: Routledge; 1992
  • 28 Winner L. Upon opening the black box of technology and finding it empty: social constructivism and the philosophy of technology. Science, Technology and Human Values 1993; 18 (Suppl. 03) 362-78.
  • 29 Russell S. The social construction of artefacts: a response to Pinch and Bijker. Social Studies of Science 1986; 16: 331-46.
  • 30 Horkheimer M, Adorno TW. Dialectic of enlightenment. New York: Social Studies Association; 1944
  • 31 Horkheimer M. Traditional and critical theory. In: Horkheimer M. Critical theory. New York: Herder and Herder; 1972. pp. 188-243.
  • 32 Feenberg A. Critical theory of technology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1991
  • 33 Marcuse H. One-dimensional man. London: Sphere Books; 1970
  • 34 Ciborra CU. The platform organization: recombining strategies, structures, and suprises. Organization Science 1996; 7 (Suppl. 02) 103-18.
  • 35 Ciborra CU, Hanseth O. From tool to gestell: agendas for managing the information infrastructure. Information Technology and People 1998; 11 (Suppl. 04) 305-27.
  • 36 Ciborra CU. A theory of information systems based on improvisation. In: Currie WL, Galliers B. editors. Rethinking Management Information Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999. pp. 136-55.
  • 37 Klecun-Dabrowska E, Cornford T. Telehealth acquires meanings: information and communication technologies within health policy. Information Systems Journal 2000; 10 (Suppl. 01) 41-63.
  • 38 Information for Health: local implementation strategy. Unpublished report. Lambeth, Southwark: and Lewisham Health & Social Care Community; 20th July 2000
  • 39 Wilson M, Howcroft D. Power, politics and persuasion: a social shaping perspective on IS evaluation. In: Svensson L, Snis U, Sorensen C, Fagerlind H, Lindroth T, Magnusson M. et al., editors. 23rd IRIS Conference. 2000. pp. 725-39.