Download PDF
Methods Inf Med 2003; 42(04): 489-496
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634244
Original article
Schattauer GmbH

“We Fill in Our Working Understanding”: On Codes, Classifications and the Production of Accurate Data

B. R. Winthereik
1   Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
08 February 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objectives: This paper describes differences in the way general practitioners in Denmark, The Netherlands and Great Britain make codes fit into the local conditions under which they work.

Methods: An ethnographic study method has been used to collect data in Dutch, British and Danish general practices.

Results and Conclusions: The paper argues that what counts as “accurate data” is locally constructed. As codes are produced in local networks of human and technological actors, the way accuracy is constructed is dependent on the extra work that is carried out (by actors inside the clinic as well as outside of it). On the basis of differences between coding practices and classification systems the paper discusses how inherent tensions between coding for primary and secondary purposes can be solved. The paper concludes that instead of evaluating data in terms of how accurate they are in general, they should be looked at in terms of pertinence to specific research questions.

Keywords

Diagnostic codes - classification systems - general practice - electronic patient record - localization - accuracy - ethnography
 

  • References

  • 1 De Maeseneer JB. (ed.). Telematics in primary care. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 1995
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 2 Knottnerus JA. Role of the electronic patient record in the development of general practice in the Netherlands. Methods Inf Med 1999; 38: 350-4.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Lawrenson R, Williams T, Farmer R. Clinical information for research; the use of general practice databases. Journal of Public Health Medicine 1999; 21 (Suppl. 03) 299-304.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Bentzen NSH. ICPC – hvad skal vi dog med den?. Maanedsskrift for Praktisk Laegegerning 1991; 69: 659-63.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Berg M. Accumulation and coordination, occasions for information technologies in medical work. Comput Supp Coop Work 1999; 8: 373-401.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Bowker G, Star SL. Sorting things out, classification and its consequences. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 1999
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 7 Berg M. Rationalizing medical work, decision-support techniques and medical practices. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 1997
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 8 Silverman D. Doing qualitative research, a practical handbook. London: Sage; 2000
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 9 Winthereik BR, de Bont A. Accessing the world of doctors and their computers: ‘making available’ objects of study and the research site through ethnographic engagement. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 2002; 14 (Suppl. 02) 47-58.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 WONCA. International Classification of Primary Care ICPC-2. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 11 Roscoe T. Classification Systems: ICD SNOMED, Read Codes. The WISDOM Centre; 2000
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 12 Kay S, Purves IN. Medical records and other stories: a narratological framework. Methods Inf Med 1996; 35: 72-87.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Aeskulap. Introduktion til overblik journalen (distribueret i forbindelse med overgang til Aeskulap 6.0). Aeskulap Brugerforening og Ascott Software a/s; 2000
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Jensen CB, Winthereik BR. Political and moralizing moments: on visions of IT in Danish Health Care. Information Technology and People 2002; 15 (Suppl. 03) 227-41.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Lagendijk PJB, Schuring RW, Spil TAM. Electronisch Voorschrijf Systeem, “van kwaal tot medicijn”. Enschede: Universiteit Twente; 2001
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 16 van der Lei J. Use and abuse of computer-stored medical records (editorial). Methods Inf Med 1991; 30: 79-80.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Hassey A, Gerrett D, Wilson A. A survey of validity and utility of electronic patient records in a general practice. BMJ; 2001. 322 1401-5.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 18 Pringle M, Ward P, Chilvers C. Assessment of the completeness and accuracy of computer medical records in four practices committed to recording data on computer. Br J Gen Pract 1995; 45: 537-41.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Nilsson G, Petersson H, Aalfeldt H, Strender LE. Evaluation of three Swedish ICD-10 primary care versions, reliability and ease of use in diagnostic coding. Methods Inf Med 2000; 39 4-5 325-31.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Berg M, Timmermans S. Orders and their others, on the constitution of universalities in medical work. Configurations 2000; 8: 31-61.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Gomart E. Eloge of methadone at the Blue Clinic. Body and Society; forthcoming.: