Transforming a Hospital through Growing, not Building, an Electronic Patient Record System

Abstract

The benefits for any health care provider of successfully introducing an Electronic Patient Record System (EPRS) into their organisation can be considerable. It has the potential to enhance both clinical care and managerial processes, as well as producing more cost-effective care and care programmes across clinical disciplines and health care sectors. However, realising an EPRS's full potential can be a long and difficult process and should not be entered into lightly. Introducing an EPR System involves major personnel, organisational and technological changes. These changes must be interwoven and symbiotic and must be managed so that they grow together in stages towards a vision created and shared by all clinical professional staff, other staff, and managers in that process. The use of traditional “building” or “journey” metaphors inadequately reflects the complexity, uncertainty and, therefore, the unpredictability of the process. We propose that a more useful metaphor may be of “growing” a progressively more united, unified information system and health care organisation. We suggest this metaphor better recognises that the evolutionary process appears to be more organic than predictable and more systemic than mechanistic. An illustration is given of how these organisational clinical and technical issues might evolve and interweave in a hospital setting through a number of stages.

Keywords

Electronic Patient Record - Organizational Change - Implementation - Information Systems

• REFERENCES

• 1 Protti DJ, Haskell AR. Managing Information in Hospitals: 60% Social, 40% Technical. In: Ehlers C, Bakker AR, Bryant J, Hammond W. eds. Proceedings of IMIA Working Conference on Trends in Hospital Information Systems. Amsterdam: North Holland; 1992: 45-9.
• 2 Lorenzi NM, Riley RT. Organisational Aspects of Health Informatics – Managing Technological Change. New York: Springer-Veriag; 1995
• 3 Rector AL. Art and Science – Problems and Solutions (Editorial Commentary). Meth Inform Med 1996; 35: 181-4.
• 4 Brown SH, Coney RD. Changes in Physicians' Computer Anxiety and Attitudes Related to Clinical Information System Use. JAMIA 1994; 1: 381-94.
• 5 Sittig DF. Grand Challenges in Medical Informatics?. JAMIA 1994; 1: 412-3.
• 6 Venkatraman N. IT-Induced Business Reconfiguration. In: Scott-Morton MS. ed. The Corporation of the 1990s, Information Technology and Organisational Transformation. New York: Oxford University Press; 1991: 122-58.
• 7 Zuboff S. In the Age of the Smart Machine – The Future of Work and Power. New York: Basic Books; 1988
• 8 de Jong WM, Simons JL. Why Implementing Information Technology is no Technicality. ACM SIGCPR annual conference. St Louis: 1-3 April 1993
• 9 van Gennip EMSJ, Talmon JL. eds. Assesment and Evaluation of Information Technologies in Medicine. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 1995
• 10 Wyatt J, Spiegelhalter D. Evaluating Medical Expert Systems: What to Test and How?. Meth Inform Med 1990; 15: 205-17.
• 11 Peel VJ. An Evaluation of the Two English NHS Electronic Patient Record and Hospital Information Systems and of Three Integrated Clinical Workstation (ICWS) Demonstrators – A multi focus and multi method approach. In: Waegemann P. ed. Proceedings Toward an Electronic Health Record Europe '96. London: CAEHR; 1996
• 12 Kaplan B, Lundsgaarde HP. Toward an Evaluation of an Integrated Clinical Imaging System: Identifying Clinical Benefits. Meth Inform Med 1996; 35: 221-30.
• 13 Forester T. Megatrends or Megamistakes? What Ever Happened to the Information Society. Inform Soc 1992; 8: 133-46.
• 14 Rind DM, Safran C. Real and Imagined Barriers to an Electronic Patient Record. In: Safran C. ed. Proceedings Seventeenth Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1993: 74-8.
• 15 Morgan G. Images of Organization. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1986
• 16 Lambert R, Peppard J. Information Technology and New Organisational Forms: Destination But No Road Map?. J Strat Inform Sys 1993; 2: 180-205.
• 17 Atkinson CJ. Soft Information Systems and Technology Methodology (SISTeM)): a Case Study on Developing the Patient Record. British J Requirements Engineering 1997; 2: 1-22.
• 18 Peel VJ, Rea C. Fourth Evaluation of the Clwyd Hospital, Information System and Resource Management Project. Cardiff: Welsh Office; 1997
• 19 Vincent MA, Patchett T. The Benefits of Case-mix Management Systems: Are There Any?. In: Proceedings Healthcare Computing. Harrogate: 1993: 341-4.
• 20 Peel VJ, Rea C. The Evaluation of the NHS Resource Management Programme in England. Manchester: Health Services Management Unit; 1996
• 21 Smith HA, McKeen JD. Computerization and Management: a Study of Conflict and Change. Information and Management 1992; 22: 53-64.
• 22 Detmer DE. Medical Informatics: A Mutagenic Force for Artistry and Science in the Healing Professions. Meth Inform Med J 1996; 35: 178-80.
• 23 Lorenzi NM, Gardner RM, Pryor TA, Stead WW. Medical Informatics: The Key to an Organization's Place in the New Health Care Environment. JAMIA 1995; 2: 391-2.