Methods Inf Med 1998; 37(04/05): 353-360
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634562
Original Article
Schattauer GmbH

The Nature of Lexical Knowledge

A. T. McCray
1   National Library of Medicine, Bethesda MD, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
15 February 2018 (online)

Abstract

This paper considers the nature of lexical knowledge and its role in language and information processing. The lexicon is the central component of language and plays a pivotal role in current linguistic theory [3, 4] and, increasingly, in natural language processing systems [5-7]. The lexicon embodies information aboutthe lexical items ofthe language and serves as the foundation for morphologic, syntactic, and semantic processing. The differences as well as commonalities among dictionaries, thesauri, and lexicons are discussed, and distinctions between words, lexical items, and terms are drawn. Next, the scope and content ofthe SPECIALIST lexicon are presented, followed by a discussion of certain writing conventions that can be troublesome for text processing applications. One approach to handling orthographic and other lexical variation is discussed in a section that reports on the design and implementation of the SPECIALIST lexical programs. The paper concludes with a discussion of controlled terminologies for the medical domain. Throughout the discussion, examples are drawn from the SPECIALIST lexicon and from the other UMLS knowledge sources [8,9].

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Sapir E. Language. Harcourt: Brace & World, Inc; 1921
  • 2 Lipka L. An Outline of English Lexicology. Max Niemeyer Verlag; 1990
  • 3 Chomsky N. Lectures on Government and Binding. Foris Publications; 1982
  • 4 Szabolcsi A. Combinatory Grammar and Projection from the Lexicon. In: Sag IA, and Szabolcsi A. (eds) Lexical Matters. Center for the Study of Language and Information; 1992: 241-68.
  • 5 McCray AT, Sponsler JL, Brylawski B, Browne AC. The Role of Lexical Knowledge in Biomedical Text Understanding. In: Stead W. (ed) Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. 1987: 103-7.
  • 6 Guthrie L, Pustejovsky J, Wilks Y, Slator BM. The Role of Lexicons in Natural Language Processing. Communications of the ACM 1996; (30) 1: 63-72.
  • 7 Pustejovsky J. Semantics and the Lexicon. Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1993
  • 8 McCray AT, Srinivasan S, Browne AC. Lexical Methods for Managing Variation in Biomedical Terminologies. In: Ozbolt JG. (ed.) Proceedings of the 18th Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. 1994: 235-9.
  • 9 McCray AT, and Nelson SJ. The Representation of Meaning in the UMLS. Meth Inform Med 1995; 34: 193-201.
  • 10 Landau SI. Dictionaries: The Art and Craft of Lexicography. Cambridge University Press; 1989
  • 11 NISO Z39.19-199X. Construction, Format and Management of Monolingual Thesauri (Revision of ANSI Z39.19-1980). Revision in preparation, 3rd draft. 1980
  • 12 Sparck Jones K. Synonymy and Semantic Classification. Edinburgh University Press; 1986
  • 13 Condamines A. Terminology: New Needs, New Perspectives. Terminology 1995; 2 (2) 219-38.
  • 14 Bauer L. English Word-Formation. Cambridge University Press; 1983
  • 15 Marchand H. The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word Formation. Beck. 1969
  • 16 McCray AT, Browne AC, and Moore DL. The Semantic Structure of Neo-Classical Compounds. In: Greenes R. (ed.) Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. 1988: 165-8.
  • 17 Pacak M, Norton LM, Dunham G. Morpho-semantic Analysis of it is Forms in Medical Language. Meth Inform 1980; 19: 99-105.
  • 18 Logan CM, Rice MK. Logan's Medical and Scientific Abbreviations. JB Lipppincott Company; 1987
  • 19 Cruse DA. Lexical Semantics. Cambridge University Press; 1986
  • 20 Kageura K. Toward the Theoretical Study of Terms – A sketch from the linguistic viewpoint. Terminology 1995; (2) 2: 239-58.
  • 21 Procter P. (ed.) Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. Longman Group Limited; 1978
  • 22 Sinclair J. (ed.) Collins Cobuild English Language Dictionary. Collins; 1987
  • 23 Taylor EJ. (ed.) Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary. WB Saunders Company; 1988
  • 24 Pease RW. (ed.) Webster's Medical Desk Dictionary. Merriam-Webster Inc; 1986
  • 25 Hensyl WR. (ed.) Illustrated Stedman's Medical Dictionary. Williams & Wilkins; 1982
  • 26 Cummings DW. American English Spelling. Johns Hopkins University Press; 1988
  • 27 Peterson JL. Computer Programs for Detecting and Correcting Spelling Errors. Communications of the ACM 1980; (23) 12: 676-87.
  • 28 Quirk R, Greenbaum S, Leech G. Svartvik A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Longman; 1985
  • 29 Grefenstette G, Tapanainen P. What is a Word, What is a sentence? Problems of Tokenization. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Computational Lexicography. 1994: 79-87.
  • 30 Humphreys BL, Hole WT, McCray AT, and Fitzmaurice MJ. Planned NLM/AHCPR large-scale vocabulary test: Using UMLS technology to determine the extent to which controlled vocabularies cover terminology needed for health care and public health. JAMA 1996; (3) 4: 281-7.
  • 31 Board of Directors of the American Medical Informatics Association. Standards for Medical Identifiers, Codes, and Messages Needed to Create an Efficient Computer-stored Medical Record. JAMA 1994; (1) 1: 1-7.
  • 32 Cimino JJ, Clayton PD, Hripcsak G, Johnson SB. Knowledge-based Approaches to the Maintenance of a Large Controlled Medical Terminology. JAMA 1994; (1) 1: 35-50.
  • 33 Campbell KE, Das AK, Musen MA. A Logical Foundation for Representation of Clinical Data. 1994 (1) 3. 218-32.
  • 34 Rector AL, Nowlan WA. The Galen Project. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 1994; 1-2: 75-8.
  • 35 Musen MA, Wieckert KE, Miller ET, Campbell KE, Fagan LM. Development of a Controlled Medical Terminology: Knowledge Acquisition and Knowledge Representation. Meth Inform Med 1995; 34: 85-95.