Methods for Improving the Repeatability of Automated ECG Analysis

Abstract:

Statistically-based smoothing techniques are described which have been applied to the existing framework of the Glasgow ECG Analysis program. These methods have been designed with the aim of improving repeatability in the computer interpretation of ECGs which have been recorded either several minutes or 24 hours apart from patients in a clinically stable condition. With respect to the ECG diagnosis of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy (LVH), these flexible methods have the effect of reducing the number of inconsistent day-to-day interpretations by 36% from 33 to 21 in

330 pairs of ECGs recorded one day apart. Similarly, when comparing agreement in the diagnosis of LVH in 249 pairs of ECGs which were recorded several minutes apart, the number of discordant computer interpretations was 6 using the new methodology, compared with 13 using conventional criteria, i. e. there was a 54% reduction in disagreements.

Keywords:

Electrocardiogram - Computer Analysis - Repeatability - Day-today variation

• References

• 1 Pipberger HV, Freis ED, Taback L, Mason HL. Preparation of electrocardiographic data for analysis by a digital electronic computer. Circulation 1960; 21: 413-8.
• 2 Caceres CA, Steinberg CA, Abraham S. et al. Computer extraction of electrocardiographic parameters. Circulation 1962; 25: 356-62.
• 3 Willems JL, Arnaud P, Van Bernrnel JH, Degani R, Macfarlane PW, Zywietz C. Common standards for quantitative electrocardiography: goals and main results. Meth Inform Med 1990; 29: 261-2.
• 4 Willems JL, Abreu-Lima C, Arnaud P. et al. The diagnostic performance of computer programs for the interpretation of electrocardiograms. N Engl J Med 1991; 352: 1767-73.
• 5 Macfarlane PW, Devine B, Latif S, McLaughlin SC, Shoat DB, Watts MP. Methodology of ECG interpretation in the Glasgow Program. Meth Inform Med 1990; 29: 354-61.
• 6 Macfarlane PW, Lawrie TDV. The normal electrocardiogram and vectorcardiogram. In: Macfarlane PW, Lawrie TDV. eds. Comprehensive Electrocardiology. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1989: 407-57.
• 7 Chen CY, Chiang BN, Macfarlane PW. Normal limits of the electrocardiogram in a Chinese population. J Electrocardiol 1989; 22: 1-15.
• 8 Lewis T, Gilder MD. The human electrocardiogram: A preliminary investigation of young adult males to form a basis for pathological study. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B; Biological Sciences (London) 1912; 202: 351-76.
• 9 Simonson E, Brozek J, Keys A. Variability of the electrocardiogram in normal young men. Am Heart J 1949; 38: 407-22.
• 10 Sears GA, Manning GW. Routine electrocardiography: Postprandial T-wave changes. Am Heart J 1958; 56: 591-7.
• 11 Graybiel A, Starr RS, White PD. Electrocardiographic changes following the inhalation of tobacco smoke. Am Heart J 1938; 15: 89-99.
• 12 Willems JL, Poblete PF, Pipberger HV. Dayto-day variation of the normal orthogonal electrocardiogram and vectorcardiogram. Circulation 1972; 45: 1057-64.
• 13 Watts MP, Shoat DB. Trends in electrocardiographic design. J IERE 1987; 57: 140-50.
• 14 Kalbfleisch JG. Probability and Statistical Inference II. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1979
• 15 McLaughlin SC. Statistical Techniques for Improving the Repeatability of Automated ECG Interpretation. (PhD thesis). Glasgow University; 1992
• 16 Simonson E. Differentiation between Normal and Abnormal in Electrocardiography. St. Louis: The C. V. Mosby Company; 1961
• 17 Macfarlane PW, Coleman EN, Pomphrey EO, McLaughlin SC, Houston A, Aitchison TC. Normal limits of the high-fidelity pediatric ECG. J Electrocardiol 1989; 22 (Suppl): 162-8.
• 18 Romhilt OW, Estes EH. A point scoring system for the electrocardiographic diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy. Am Heart J 1968; 75: 752-8.
• 19 McLaughlin SC, Aitchison TC, Macfarlane PW. Improved repeatability of 12 lead ECG analysis using continuous scoring techniques. J Electrocardiol 1993; 26 (Suppl): 101-7.
• 20 Machado HB, Emilia M, Silva P, Lourenco L. Reproducibility of diagnostic interpretative statements in a leading ECG computerised system. Proceedings of Melecon ’91 1991; 793-5.
• 21 Bailey JJ, Itscoitz SB, Hirshfield JW, Grauer LE, Horton MR. A method for evaluating computer programs for electrocardiographic interpretation. Circulation 1974; 50: 73-93.
• 22 McNemar Q. Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika 1993; 12: 153-7.
• 23 Yang TF. Artificial Neural networks in Computerised Electrocardiography. (PhD thesis). Glasgow University; 1994