Autoregressive Modeling with Exogenous Input of Middle-Latency Auditory-Evoked Potentials to Measure Rapid Changes in Depth of Anesthesia

Abstract:

Obtaining an adequate depth of anesthesia is a continuous challenge to the anesthetist. With the introduction of muscle-relaxing agents the traditional signs of awareness are often obscured, or difficult to interpret. These signs include blood pressure, heart rate, pupil size, etc. However, these factors do not describe the depth of anesthesia (DA) in a cerebral activity sense. Hence, a better measure of the DA is required. It has been suggested that Auditory-Evoked Potentials (AEP) can provide additional information about the DA. The general method of extracting AEP is by use of a Moving Time Average (MTA). However, the MTA is time consuming because a large number of repetitions is needed to produce an estimate of the AEP. Hence, changes occurring over a small number of sweeps will not be detected by the MTA average. We describe a system-identification method, an autoregressive model with exogeneous input (ARX) model, to produce a sweep-by-sweep estimate of the AEP. The method was clinically evaluated in 10 patients anesthetized with alfentanil and propofol. The time interval between propofol induction and the time when the Na-Pa amplitude was decreased to 25% of the initial amplitude was measured. These measurements showed that ARX-estimated compared to MTA-estimated AEP was significantly faster in tracing transition from consciousness to unconsciousness during propofol induction (p <0.05).

Keywords:

Depth of Anesthesia - Auditory-Evoked Potentials - Autoregressive Modeling

• References

• 1 Thornton C. Evoked potentials in anesthesia. Eur J Anesthesiol 1991; 8: 89-107.
• 2 Thornton C. Somatosensory and auditory evoked responses recorded simultaneously; Differential effects of nitrous oxide and isoflurane. BJA 1992; 68: 508-14.
• 3 Schwender D, Rimkus T. Effects of increasing doses of alfentanil, fentanyl and morphine on mid-latency auditory evoked potentials. BJA 1993; 71: 622-8.
• 4 Schwender D, Klasing S, Madler C, Pöppel E, Peter K. Mid-latency auditory evoked potentials and cognitive function during general anaesthesia. Intern Anesthesiol Clinics 1993; 31: 89-106.
• 5 Davies FW, Mantzaridis H, Kenny GNC, Fisher AC. Middle latency auditory evoked potentials during repeated transitions from consciousness to unconsciousness. Anesthesia 1996; 51: 107-13.
• 6 Garcia-Larrea L, Fischer C, Artru F. Effet des anésthesiques sur les potentiels évoqués sensoriels. Neurophysiol Clin 1993; 23: 141-62.
• 7 Cerutti S, Baselli G, Liberad D. Single sweep analysis of visual evoked potentials through a model of parametric identification. Biol Cybern 1987; 56: 111-20.
• 8 Liberatti D, Cerutti S. The implementation of an autoregressive model with exogenous input in a single sweep visual evoked potential analysis. J Biomed Eng 1989; 11: 285-92.
• 9 Cohen A. Biomedical Signal Processing. CRC Press; 1986
• 10 Jansen BH. Analysis of biomedical signals by means of linear modelling. In: CRC Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering. 1985
• 11 Box GEP, Jenkins GM. Time-series Analysis Forecasting and Control. Holden-Day; San Francisco CA: 1976
• 12 Akaike H. Statistical predictor identification. Ann Inst Statist Math 1970; 22: 203-17.
• 13 Woody CD. Characterisation of an adaptive filter for the analysis of variable latency neu roelectric signals. Med Biol Engin 1967; 5: 539-53.
• 14 Aunon JI, McGillem CD. Techniques for processing single evoked potentials. In: Trans San Diego Biomed Symp 1975; 211-75.
• 15 McGillem CD, Aunon J. Signal processing in evoked potential research: averaging and modeling. In: CRC Critical Reviews in Bioengineering 1981; 5: 323-67.
• 16 McGillem CD, Aunon JI, Pomalaza CA. Improved waveform estimation procedures for event-related potentials. IEEE BME 1985; 32: 371-9.
• 17 Jordan C, Weller C, Thornton C, Newton DEF. Monitoring evoked potentials during surgery to assess the level of anaesthesia. J Med Engin Technol 1995; 19: 77-9.