Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634685
Evaluation of Techniques for the Presentation of Laboratory Data. I: Time Needed for Interpretation
Publication History
Publication Date:
20 February 2018 (online)

Abstract:
Four tabular and two graphical techniques for the presentation of laboratory test results were evaluated in a reaction-time experiment with 25 volunteers. Artificial variables and values were used to represent sets of 12 laboratory tests to eliminate the possible effects of clinical experience. Analyses focused on reaction times for correctly classified sets of data. For comparable data sets, Presentation Techniques (PT) that use color, always allow faster interpretation than PTs that do not use color, or use only a simple marker. Color-coded tables yielded an improvement in median reaction time of approximately six times or better, as compared to the reference PT (a tabular PT without any hints). For the color-coded graphs, the improvement rate was approximately 2.5 or better.
-
References
- 1 Hoeke JOO, Gelsema ES, Wulkan RW, Leijnse B. Graphical non-linear representation of multi-dimensional laboratory measurements in their clinical context. Meth Inform Med 1991; 30: 138-44.
- 2 Verheij R, Hoeke JOO, Bonke B, Van Strik R, Gelsema ES. Evaluation of techniques for the presentation of laboratory data. II: Accuracy of interpretation. Meth Inform Med 1997; 36: 17-9.
- 3 Hoaglin DC. Revising a display of multidimensional laboratory measurements to improve accuracy of perception. Meth Inform Med 1993; 32: 418-20.
- 4 Goldschmidt AJW, Luz CJ, Giere W, Lüdecke R, Jonas D. Multi-dimensional visualisation of laboratory findings and functional test results for analysing the clinical course of disease in medicine. Meth Inform’ Med 1996; 34: 302-8.