Download PDF
Methods Inf Med 1991; 30(02): 79-80
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634831
Medical Records/Editorial
Schattauer GmbH

Use and Abuse of Computer-Stored Medical Records

J. van der Lei
1   Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University, Rotterdam
› Author AffiliationsSupport by the Netherlands Heart Foundation (Grant # 88.236) is gratefully acknowledged.
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
07 February 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

 

 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Duisterhout JS, Branger PJ. Communication in primary care systems. In: Barber B, Cao D, Qin D, Wagner G. eds. MEDINFO 89. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publ Comp; 1989: 700-3.
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Rethans JJ, Höppener P, Wolf G, Diederiks J. Do personal computers make doctors less personal?. Br Med J 1988; 296: 1446-8.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Westerhof HP, Boon WM, Cromme PVM. et al. ELIAS: Support of the Dutch general practitioner. In: Present Status of Computer Support in Ambulatory Care. Reichertz PL, Engelbrecht R, Picollo U. (eds). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 1987: 1-10.
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Quaak MJ, Westerman RF, Van Bemmel JH. Comparisons between written and computerised patient histories. Br Med J 1987; 295: 184-90.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Quaak MJ, Westerman RF, Schouten JA, Hasman A, Van Bemmel JH. Patient appreciations of computerized medical interviews. Med Inform 1986; 11: 339-50.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Koran LM. The reliability of clinical methods, data and judgements. N Engl J Med. 1975 293. 642-6 and 695-701..
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Komaroff AL. The variability and inaccuracy of medical data. Proc. IEEE 1979; 28: 1196-207.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Hsia DC, Kxushat WM, Fagan AB, Tebbutt JA, Kusserow RP. Accuracy of diagnostic coding for Medicare patients under the prospective-payment system. N Engl J Med 1988; 318: 352-5.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 McMahon LF, Smits HL. Can Medicare prospective payment survive the ICD-9-CM disease classification system?. Ann Intern Med 1986; 104: 562-6.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Burnum JF. The misinformation era: Tl fall of the medical record. Ann Intern MM 1989; 110: 482-4.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 McDonald CJ, Tierney WM. Computed stored medical records: Their future role in medical practise. JAMA 1988; 259: 3433-40.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Barnett GO. The application of computer-based medical-record systems in ambulatory practice. N Engl J Med 1984; 310: 1643-50.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Whiting-O’Keefe QE, Simborg DW, Epstein WV. et al. A computerized summary medical record system can produce more information than the standard medical record. JAMA 1985; 254: 1185-92.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Van der Lei J, Musen MA. A model for critiquing based on automated medical records. Comp Biomed Res (acc. for publication).
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Warner HR. Computer-Assisted Medical Decision Making. New York: Academic Press; 1978
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Weed LL. Medical Records, Medical Education, and Patient Care: The Problem-Oriented Record as a Basic Tool. Cleveland, OH: Case Western Reserve Press; 1971
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Webster’s Third New International Dictnary. London: Encyclopedia Britannicw edition of; 1971
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Feinstein AR. ICD, POR, and DRG: Uiv solved scientific problems in nosology of clinical medicine. Arch Intern Med 1988; 148: 2269-74.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Zwetsloot-Schonk JHM. Use of a hospital database to determine the characteristics of diagnostic tests. Meth Inform Med 1990; 29: 205-12.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Musen MA. The strained quality of medical data. Meth Inform Med 1989; 28: 123-5.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Rx for doctor bills. From the News Track section of the January 1990 issue of Commun ACM. 33; 1: 2.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar