Methods Inf Med 1972; 11(03): 177-182
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1636080
Original Article
Schattauer GmbH

Sources of Variation in Clinical Observations: Problems of Teaching and Some Results

QUELLEN DER VARIATION BEI KLINISCHEN BEOBACHTUNGEN: PROBLEME DER LEHRE UND EINIGE RESULTATE
R. A. Dixon
,
S. M. Johnston
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
09 February 2018 (online)

The Wright Peak Flowmeter has proved a useful instrument to demonstrate to fourth year medical students in a three-hour practical class the sources of random and systematic variation arising in biological measurements. A learning effect and both instrument and observer bias including terminal digit preference were analysed by the students using a desk top computer to carry out simple statistical routines. The differing requirements of reproducibility and precision in epidemiological and routine clinical use were discussed.

Das Wright Peak Flowmeter hat sich als brauchbares Instrument zur Demonstration zufälliger und systematischer Schwankungen biologischer Messungen bei Studenten eines 3stündigen Seminars im 8. Semester erwiesen, Mittels eines elektronischen Tischrechners analysierten die Studenten selbst einen Lerneffekt sowie die instrumentellen Abweichungen und die Beobachter-Inkonstanz (einschließlich der Bevorzugung gewisser Endziffern), Die unterschiedlichen Anforderungen bezüglich der Reproduzierbarkeit und der Genauigkeit in epidemiologischen und klinischen Routineuntersuchungen werden erörtert.

 
  • References

  • 1 Cochran A. L, Chapman P. J, Oldham P. D. Observers’ errors in taking medical histories. Lancet. 1951 I, 1007-1009.
  • 2 Garland L. H. On the scientific evaluation of diagnostic procedures. Radiology 52 1949; 309-328.
  • 3 Kilpatrick G. S. Observer error in medicine. J. med. Ed 38 1963; 38-43.
  • 4 Leiner G. C, Abramowitz S, Small M. J, Stenby V. B, Lewis W. A. Expiratory peak flow rate. Standard values for normal subjects. Amer. Rev. resp. Dis 88 1963; 644-651.
  • 5 Lowe C. R, McKeown T. In; Pemberton J. (Ed.): Epidemology. Reports on Research and Teaching. Oxford University Press; London: 1962
  • 6 Opit L. J, Woodroffe F. J. Computer-held clinical record system •- II, Assessment. Brit. med. J. 1970 IV, 80-82.
  • 7 Pelzer A. M, Thompson M. L. Expiratory peak flow. Brit, med. J. 1964 II, 123.
  • 8 Rose G. A, Holland W. W, Crowley E. A. A sphygmomanometer for epidemiologists. Lancet. 1964 I, 296-300.
  • 9 Wright B. M, McKerrow C. B. Maximum forced expiratory flow as a measure of ventilatory capacity. Brit. med. J. 1959 II, 1041-1046.