RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1638840
Use of Open Source Software in Health Care Delivery – Results of a Qualitative Field Study
Contribution of the EFMI LIFOSS Working GroupCorrepsondence to:
Publikationsverlauf
Publikationsdatum:
05. März 2018 (online)
Summary
Objectives: To assess and analyze the attitude of health IT executives towards the utilization of specialized medical Open Source software (OSS) in Germany's and other European countries' health care delivery.
Methods: After an initial literature review a field study was carried out based on semi-structured expert interviews. Eight German and 11 other European health IT executives were surveyed. The results were qualitatively analyzed using the grounded theory approach. Identified concepts were reviewed using SWOT analysis.
Results: In total, 13 strengths, 11 weaknesses, 3 opportunities, and 8 threats of the utilization of OSS in a clinical setting could be identified. Additionally, closely related aspects like general software procurement criteria, the overall attitude of health IT executives, users, and management towards OSS and its current and future use could as well be assessed.
Conclusions: Medical OSS is rarely used in health care delivery. In order to capitalize the unique advantages of OSS in a clinical setting, complex requirements need to be addressed. Shortcomings of OSS describe an attractive breeding ground for new commercial offerings and services that need yet to be seen.
#
Keywords
Open source - software - qualitative survey - health care delivery - health information technology - free software
#
-
References
- 1 Wheeler DA. Why Open Source Software / Free Software (OSS/FS, FLOSS, or FOSS)? Look at the Numbers!. [cited 11/2012] Available from: http://www.dwheeler.com/oss_fs_why.html
- 2 Various authors. Open source software in life science research : practical solutions to common challenges in the pharmaceutical industry and beyond. Philadelphia, PA: Woodhead Pub.; 2012
- 3 Bush M, Lederer AL, Li X, Palmisano J, Rao S. The alignment of information systems with organizational objectives and strategies in health care. Int J Med Inform 2009; Jul 78 (7) 446-56. PubMed MID: 19307148.
- 4 Iveroth E, Fryk P, Rapp B. Information technology strategy and alignment issues in health care organizations. Health Care manage Rev. 2012 Jun 19 PubMed PMID: 22722318.
- 5 Free Software Foundation, GNU. The Free Software Definition. [cited 11/2012] Available from: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
- 6 Open Source Initiative. The Open Source Definition. [cited 11/2012] Available from: http://opensource.org/docs/osd
- 7 Karopka T, Schmuhl H, Marcelo A, Molin JD, Wright G. Towards Open Collaborative Health Informatics — The Role of Free/Libre Open Source Principles. Contribution ofthe IMIA Open Source Health Informatics Working Group. Yearb Med Inform 2011; 6 (1) 63-72. PubMed PMID: 21938327.
- 8 Harhoff D, Brügge B, Picot A, Creighton O, Fiedler M, Henkel J. Open-Source-Software: Eine ökonomische und technische Analyse. [Open source software: an economical and technical analysis]. Springer; 2004
- 9 Schmuhl H. Open Source — Vor-und Nachteile für den Einsatz im Gesundheitswesen. [Open ource — advantages and disadvantages regarding its adoption in health care] E-HEALTH-COM. 2008
- 10 Paré G, Wybo MD, Delannoy C. Barriers to open source software adoption in Quebec's health care organizations. J Med Syst 2009; 33 (1) 1-7.
- 11 Hohenwarter M. Marktanalysen für Open Source Software im österreichischen Gesundheitswesen. [Market analysis of open source software in Austria's health care system]. GRIN Verlag; 2011
- 12 Flick U. An introduction to qualitative research. Sage Publications; 2009
- 13 Corbin JM, Strauss AL. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications; 2008
- 14 Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory. Sage Publications; 2006
- 15 Free Mind — free mind mapping software. [cited 10/2012] Available from: http://freemind.sourceforge.net/
- 16 Wikipedia. SWOT analysis. [cited 11/2012] Available from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWOT_analysis
- 17 OsiriX — DICOM Viewer. [cited 11/2012] Available from: http://www.osirix-viewer.com/
- 18 Mirth Connect. [cited 11/2012] Available from: http://www.mirthcorp.com/products/mirth-connect
- 19 bvitg, e.V bvitg-Branchenbarometer. 2012 [bvitg's health information technology industry barometer 2012] [cited 11/2012] Available from: http://www.bvitg.de/branchenbarometer.html
- 20 Medfloss.org — Medical Free/Libre and Open Source Software. [cited 11/2012] Available from: http://www.medfloss.org/
Correpsondence to:
-
References
- 1 Wheeler DA. Why Open Source Software / Free Software (OSS/FS, FLOSS, or FOSS)? Look at the Numbers!. [cited 11/2012] Available from: http://www.dwheeler.com/oss_fs_why.html
- 2 Various authors. Open source software in life science research : practical solutions to common challenges in the pharmaceutical industry and beyond. Philadelphia, PA: Woodhead Pub.; 2012
- 3 Bush M, Lederer AL, Li X, Palmisano J, Rao S. The alignment of information systems with organizational objectives and strategies in health care. Int J Med Inform 2009; Jul 78 (7) 446-56. PubMed MID: 19307148.
- 4 Iveroth E, Fryk P, Rapp B. Information technology strategy and alignment issues in health care organizations. Health Care manage Rev. 2012 Jun 19 PubMed PMID: 22722318.
- 5 Free Software Foundation, GNU. The Free Software Definition. [cited 11/2012] Available from: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
- 6 Open Source Initiative. The Open Source Definition. [cited 11/2012] Available from: http://opensource.org/docs/osd
- 7 Karopka T, Schmuhl H, Marcelo A, Molin JD, Wright G. Towards Open Collaborative Health Informatics — The Role of Free/Libre Open Source Principles. Contribution ofthe IMIA Open Source Health Informatics Working Group. Yearb Med Inform 2011; 6 (1) 63-72. PubMed PMID: 21938327.
- 8 Harhoff D, Brügge B, Picot A, Creighton O, Fiedler M, Henkel J. Open-Source-Software: Eine ökonomische und technische Analyse. [Open source software: an economical and technical analysis]. Springer; 2004
- 9 Schmuhl H. Open Source — Vor-und Nachteile für den Einsatz im Gesundheitswesen. [Open ource — advantages and disadvantages regarding its adoption in health care] E-HEALTH-COM. 2008
- 10 Paré G, Wybo MD, Delannoy C. Barriers to open source software adoption in Quebec's health care organizations. J Med Syst 2009; 33 (1) 1-7.
- 11 Hohenwarter M. Marktanalysen für Open Source Software im österreichischen Gesundheitswesen. [Market analysis of open source software in Austria's health care system]. GRIN Verlag; 2011
- 12 Flick U. An introduction to qualitative research. Sage Publications; 2009
- 13 Corbin JM, Strauss AL. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications; 2008
- 14 Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory. Sage Publications; 2006
- 15 Free Mind — free mind mapping software. [cited 10/2012] Available from: http://freemind.sourceforge.net/
- 16 Wikipedia. SWOT analysis. [cited 11/2012] Available from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWOT_analysis
- 17 OsiriX — DICOM Viewer. [cited 11/2012] Available from: http://www.osirix-viewer.com/
- 18 Mirth Connect. [cited 11/2012] Available from: http://www.mirthcorp.com/products/mirth-connect
- 19 bvitg, e.V bvitg-Branchenbarometer. 2012 [bvitg's health information technology industry barometer 2012] [cited 11/2012] Available from: http://www.bvitg.de/branchenbarometer.html
- 20 Medfloss.org — Medical Free/Libre and Open Source Software. [cited 11/2012] Available from: http://www.medfloss.org/