Prognosis of Transcatheter Closure Compared with Surgical Repair of Paravalvular Leak after Prosthetic Valve Replacement: A Retrospective Comparison
Chun Yang
1
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Shaanxi, Republic of China
,
Yang Liu
1
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Shaanxi, Republic of China
,
Jiayou Tang
1
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Shaanxi, Republic of China
,
Ping Jin
1
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Shaanxi, Republic of China
,
Lanlan Li
1
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Shaanxi, Republic of China
,
Shiqiang Yu
1
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Shaanxi, Republic of China
,
Jian Yang
1
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Shaanxi, Republic of China
› Author AffiliationsSources of Funding This study was supported by funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants 81470500 and 81500319) and the Distinguished Young Scholar Cultivation Project of Xijing Hospital (XJZT14J03, XJZT15ZL01).
Objective Paravalvular leak (PVL) after valve replacement remains clinically challenging. Percutaneous closure is an effective therapy for patients with PVLs because reoperation is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare the clinical outcome of transcatheter closure and surgical repair in patients with a PVL.
Methods From January 2000 to May 2016, 131 patients with PVL were treated at three major medical centers in China. Perioperative characteristics and outcomes of the procedure were reviewed.
Results Sixty-eight (51.9%) patients with PVLs were treated with percutaneous transcatheter closure (group I). The procedure was successful in 67 (98%) with no hospital deaths. Sixty-three (48.1%) patients with PVLs had a reoperation (group II). Five of the surgical patients had a third open-heart operation for residual regurgitation, and one underwent successful percutaneous closure. Six patients died in the hospital postoperatively. All patients in group II but only 11 in group I needed perioperative blood transfusions. The procedural time and hospital stay after the procedure were significantly shorter in group I than in group II. At the 1-year follow-up, cardiac function improved by ≥ 1 New York Heart Association functional class in 55 (82%) patients in group I and in 39 (68%) patients in group II.
Conclusions Transcatheter closure was shown to be a safe, effective therapeutic option in patients with PVL. It was associated with a lower hospital mortality rate, shorter procedural time, and fewer blood transfusions than surgical treatment in selected patients.
2
Hwang HY,
Choi JW,
Kim HK,
Kim KH,
Kim KB,
Ahn H.
Paravalvular leak after mitral valve replacement: 20-year follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg 2015; 100 (04) 1347-1352
3
Hourihan M,
Perry SB,
Mandell VS.
, et al. Transcatheter umbrella closure of valvular and paravalvular leaks. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 20 (06) 1371-1377
6
Xu CN,
Liu Y,
Li XF.
, et al. [Efficacy of interventional therapy on paravalvular leakage after mitral valve replacement]. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi 2016; 44 (03) 238-243
7
Li XF,
Liu Y,
Chen WS.
, et al. Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of transcatheter intervention of paravalvular leakage (pvl) after aortic valve replacement: 15 case reports. Zhonghua Xiong Xin Xue Guan Wai Ke Za Zhi 2015; 31: 748-751
8
Taramasso M,
Maisano F,
Latib A.
, et al. Conventional surgery and transcatheter closure via surgical transapical approach for paravalvular leak repair in high-risk patients: results from a single-centre experience. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2014; 15 (10) 1161-1167
10
Williams MR,
Koeckert MS,
Grossi EA.
Rethinking the gold standard for correction of paravalvular leak. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016; 151 (05) 1267-1268
11
Taramasso M,
Maisano F,
Pozzoli A,
Alfieri O,
Meier B,
Nietlispach F.
Catheter-based treatment of paravalvular leaks. EuroIntervention 2016; 12 (Suppl X): X55-X60
13
Pinheiro CP,
Rezek D,
Costa EP.
, et al. Paravalvular regurgitation: clinical outcomes in surgical and percutaneous treatments. [Article in English, Portuguese] Arq Bras Cardiol 2016; 107 (01) 55-62
18
Bouhout I,
Mazine A,
Ghoneim A.
, et al. Long-term results after surgical treatment of paravalvular leak in the aortic and mitral position. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016; 151 (05) 1260-6.e1
19
Taramasso M,
Maisano F,
Denti P.
, et al. Surgical treatment of paravalvular leak: long-term results in a single-center experience (up to 14 years). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 149 (05) 1270-1275
20
Kim SJ,
Samad Z,
Bloomfield GS,
Douglas PS.
A critical review of hemodynamic changes and left ventricular remodeling after surgical aortic valve replacement and percutaneous aortic valve replacement. Am Heart J 2014; 168 (02) 150-9.e1 , 7