Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019; 67(06): 428-436
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1660518
Original Cardiovascular
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Diabetic Patients: Complete Arterial versus Internal Thoracic Artery and Sequential Vein Grafts—A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis

Takashi Kunihara
1   Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, The Cardiovascular Institute, Tokyo, Japan
,
Olaf Wendler
2   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
,
Kerstin Heinrich
3   Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Homburg, Germany
,
Ryota Nomura
3   Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Homburg, Germany
,
Hans-Joachim Schäfers
3   Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Homburg, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

01 March 2018

27 April 2018

Publication Date:
20 June 2018 (online)

Abstract

Background The optimal choice of conduit and configuration for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in diabetic patients remains somewhat controversial, even though arterial grafts have been proposed as superior. We attempted to clarify the role of complete arterial revascularization using the left internal thoracic artery (LITA) and the radial artery (RA) alone in “T-Graft” configuration on long-term outcome.

Methods and Results From 1994 to 2001, 104 diabetic patients with triple vessel disease underwent CABG using LITA/RA “T-Grafts” (Group-A). Using propensity-score matching, 104 patients with comparable preoperative characteristics who underwent CABG using LITA and one sequential vein graft were identified (Group-V). Freedom from all causes of death, cardiac death, major adverse cardiac event (MACE), major adverse cardiac (and cerebral) event (MACCE), and repeat revascularization at 10 years of Group-A was 60 ± 5%, 67 ± 5%, 48 ± 5%, 37 ± 5%, and 81 ± 4%, respectively, compared with 58 ± 5%, 70 ± 5%, 49 ± 5%, 39 ± 5%, and 93 ± 3% in Group-V. There were no significant differences in these end points between groups regardless of insulin-dependency. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model identified age, left ventricular ejection fraction, renal failure, and hyperlipidemia as independent predictors for all death, age and left ventricular ejection fraction for cardiac death, sinus rhythm for both MACE and MACCE, and prior percutaneous coronary intervention for re-revascularization.

Conclusions In our experience, complete arterial revascularization using LITA/RA “T-Grafts” does not provide superior long-term clinical benefits for diabetic patients compared with a combination of LITA and sequential vein graft.

Disclosure

All the authors have nothing to disclose with regard to commercial support.


Supplementary Material

 
  • References

  • 1 Verma S, Farkouh ME, Yanagawa B. , et al. Comparison of coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2013; 1 (04) 317-328
  • 2 Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM. , et al. Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med 1986; 314 (01) 1-6
  • 3 Hayward PA, Gordon IR, Hare DL. , et al. Comparable patencies of the radial artery and right internal thoracic artery or saphenous vein beyond 5 years: results from the radial artery patency and clinical outcomes trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 139 (01) 60-65 , discussion 65–67
  • 4 Takagi H, Goto SN, Watanabe T, Mizuno Y, Kawai N, Umemoto T. A meta-analysis of adjusted hazard ratios from 20 observational studies of bilateral versus single internal thoracic artery coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 148 (04) 1282-1290
  • 5 Taggart DP, Altman DG, Gray AM. , et al; ART Investigators. Randomized trial to compare bilateral vs. single internal mammary coronary artery bypass grafting: 1-year results of the Arterial Revascularisation Trial (ART). Eur Heart J 2010; 31 (20) 2470-2481
  • 6 Raza S, Sabik III JF, Masabni K, Ainkaran P, Lytle BW, Blackstone EH. Surgical revascularization techniques that minimize surgical risk and maximize late survival after coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 148 (04) 1257-1264 , discussion 1264–1266
  • 7 Muneretto C, Negri A, Manfredi J. , et al. Safety and usefulness of composite grafts for total arterial myocardial revascularization: a prospective randomized evaluation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 125 (04) 826-835
  • 8 Athanasiou T, Saso S, Rao C. , et al. Radial artery versus saphenous vein conduits for coronary artery bypass surgery: forty years of competition--which conduit offers better patency? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011; 40 (01) 208-220
  • 9 Schwartz L, Kip KE, Frye RL, Alderman EL, Schaff HV, Detre KM. ; Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation. Coronary bypass graft patency in patients with diabetes in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI). Circulation 2002; 106 (21) 2652-2658
  • 10 Deb S, Singh SK, Moussa F. , et al; Radial Artery Patency Study Investigators. The long-term impact of diabetes on graft patency after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a substudy of the multicenter Radial Artery Patency Study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 148 (04) 1246-1253 , discussion 1253
  • 11 BARI Investigators. Seven-year outcome in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) by treatment and diabetic status. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35 (05) 1122-1129
  • 12 Hoffman DM, Dimitrova KR, Decastro H. , et al. Improving long term outcome for diabetic patients undergoing surgical revascularization by use of the radial artery conduit: a propensity matched study. J Cardiothorac Surg 2013; 8: 27
  • 13 Schwann TA, Al-Shaar L, Engoren M, Habib RH. Late effects of radial artery vs saphenous vein grafting for multivessel coronary bypass surgery in diabetics: a propensity-matched analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013; 44 (04) 701-710
  • 14 Wendler O, Hennen B, Demertzis S. , et al. Complete arterial revascularization in multivessel coronary artery disease with 2 conduits (skeletonized grafts and T grafts). Circulation 2000; 102 (19, Suppl 3): III79-III83
  • 15 Wendler O, Hennen B, Markwirth T. , et al. T grafts with the right internal thoracic artery to left internal thoracic artery versus the left internal thoracic artery and radial artery: flow dynamics in the internal thoracic artery main stem. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999; 118 (05) 841-848
  • 16 Schwann TA, Habib RH, Wallace A. , et al. Operative outcomes of multiple-arterial versus single-arterial coronary bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2018; 105 (04) 1109-1119
  • 17 Boodhwani M, Lam BK, Nathan HJ. , et al. Skeletonized internal thoracic artery harvest reduces pain and dysesthesia and improves sternal perfusion after coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized, double-blind, within-patient comparison. Circulation 2006; 114 (08) 766-773
  • 18 Buxton BF, Ruengsakulrach P, Fuller J, Rosalion A, Reid CM, Tatoulis J. The right internal thoracic artery graft--benefits of grafting the left coronary system and native vessels with a high grade stenosis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000; 18 (03) 255-261
  • 19 Tector AJ, McDonald ML, Kress DC, Downey FX, Schmahl TM. Purely internal thoracic artery grafts: outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 72 (02) 450-455
  • 20 Calafiore AM, Contini M, Vitolla G. , et al. Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting: long-term clinical and angiographic results of in situ versus Y grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000; 120 (05) 990-996
  • 21 Hirotani T, Nakamichi T, Munakata M, Takeuchi S. Risks and benefits of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in diabetic patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 76 (06) 2017-2022
  • 22 Kajimoto K, Yamamoto T, Amano A. Coronary artery bypass revascularization using bilateral internal thoracic arteries in diabetic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2015; 99 (03) 1097-1104
  • 23 Deo SV, Shah IK, Dunlay SM. , et al. Bilateral internal thoracic artery harvest and deep sternal wound infection in diabetic patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2013; 95 (03) 862-869
  • 24 Matsa M, Paz Y, Gurevitch J. , et al. Bilateral skeletonized internal thoracic artery grafts in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001; 121 (04) 668-674
  • 25 Choudhary BP, Antoniades C, Brading AF, Galione A, Channon K, Taggart DP. Diabetes mellitus as a predictor for radial artery vasoreactivity in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50 (11) 1047-1053
  • 26 Zou L, Chen X, Chen W. , et al. Comparative study on the histomorphology and molecular biology of radial artery conduits in patients with diabetes mellitus who underwent coronary bypass surgery. Diab Vasc Dis Res 2013; 10 (03) 208-215
  • 27 Buxton BF, Shi WY, Galvin SD, Fuller J, Hayward PA. Total arterial coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with diabetes: an 8-year experience. Intern Med J 2012; 42 (Suppl. 05) 9-15
  • 28 Raza S, Blackstone EH, Houghtaling PL. , et al. Similar outcomes in diabetes patients after coronary artery bypass grafting with single internal thoracic artery plus radial artery grafting and bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2017; 104 (06) 1923-1932
  • 29 Vural KM, Sener E, Taşdemir O. Long-term patency of sequential and individual saphenous vein coronary bypass grafts. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001; 19 (02) 140-144
  • 30 Garatti A, Castelvecchio S, Canziani A. , et al. Long-term results of sequential vein coronary artery bypass grafting compared with totally arterial myocardial revascularization: a propensity score-matched follow-up study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2014; 46 (06) 1006-1013 , discussion 1013