J Knee Surg 2019; 32(08): 736-741
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1666866
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Predicting the Outcome of Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the WOMAC Score: A Review of the Literature

Lucy Camilla Walker
1   Department of Orthopaedics, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals Foundation Trust, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
,
Nick D. Clement
1   Department of Orthopaedics, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals Foundation Trust, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
,
David J. Deehan
1   Department of Orthopaedics, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals Foundation Trust, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

24 October 2017

26 May 2018

Publication Date:
10 July 2018 (online)

Abstract

It is estimated that up to a third of recipients of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) experience chronic pain postoperatively. However, there are no clear indications within the literature that predict which patients are at higher risk of being dissatisfied with their TKA. The Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) is one of the most commonly used, patient-reported outcome measures in patients with lower limb osteoarthritis. This review discusses the available evidence surrounding the predictability of the outcome of TKA using the WOMAC score as well as considering further patient factors that have been implicated in the level of improvement post TKA. It may be concluded from the available literature that a combination of knee scores and patient factors would be the most accurate way of predicting those patients most likely to have a good outcome from their TKA. There is some disparity within the literature about which patient factors and reported outcome measure scores lead to a positive postoperative outcome. Patient expectations following the procedure also need to be evaluated, as objective measures on a scoring system do not necessarily equate with the subjective patient experience.

 
  • References

  • 1 Vina ER, Hannon MJ, Kwoh CK. Improvement following total knee replacement surgery: Exploring preoperative symptoms and change in preoperative symptoms. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2016; 45 (05) 547-555
  • 2 Zhang W, Nuki G, Moskowitz RW. , et al. OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis: part III: Changes in evidence following systematic cumulative update of research published through January 2009. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2010; 18 (04) 476-499
  • 3 Losina E, Thornhill TS, Rome BN, Wright J, Katz JN. The dramatic increase in total knee replacement utilization rates in the United States cannot be fully explained by growth in population size and the obesity epidemic. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94 (03) 201-207
  • 4 Beswick AD, Wylde V, Gooberman-Hill R, Blom A, Dieppe P. What proportion of patients report long-term pain after total hip or knee replacement for osteoarthritis? A systematic review of prospective studies in unselected patients. BMJ Open 2012; 2 (01) e000435
  • 5 Wylde V, Dieppe P, Hewlett S, Learmonth ID. Total knee replacement: is it really an effective procedure for all?. Knee 2007; 14 (06) 417-423
  • 6 Escobar A, Quintana JM, Aróstegui I. , et al. Development of explicit criteria for total knee replacement. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2003; 19 (01) 57-70
  • 7 Riddle DL, Jiranek WA, Hayes CW. Use of a validated algorithm to judge the appropriateness of total knee arthroplasty in the United States: a multicenter longitudinal cohort study. Arthritis Rheumatol 2014; 66 (08) 2134-2143
  • 8 Wyrwich KW, Nienaber NA, Tierney WM, Wolinsky FD. Linking clinical relevance and statistical significance in evaluating intra-individual changes in health-related quality of life. Med Care 1999; 37 (05) 469-478
  • 9 Tubach F, Dougados M, Falissard B, Baron G, Logeart I, Ravaud P. Feeling good rather than feeling better matters more to patients. Arthritis Rheum 2006; 55 (04) 526-530
  • 10 Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988; 15 (12) 1833-1840
  • 11 Giesinger JM, Hamilton DF, Jost B, Behrend H, Giesinger K. WOMAC, EQ-5D and knee society score thresholds for treatment success after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30 (12) 2154-2158
  • 12 Wolfe F, Kong SX. Rasch analysis of the Western Ontario MacMaster questionnaire (WOMAC) in 2205 patients with osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and fibromyalgia. Ann Rheum Dis 1999; 58 (09) 563-568
  • 13 Impellizzeri FM, Mannion AF, Leunig M, Bizzini M, Naal FD. Comparison of the reliability, responsiveness, and construct validity of 4 different questionnaires for evaluating outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26 (06) 861-869
  • 14 Terwee CB, Roorda LD, Knol DL, De Boer MR, De Vet HC. Linking measurement error to minimal important change of patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62 (10) 1062-1067
  • 15 Lungu E, Desmeules F, Dionne CE, Belzile ÉL, Vendittoli PA. Prediction of poor outcomes six months following total knee arthroplasty in patients awaiting surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014; 15 (01) 299
  • 16 Lavernia C, D'Apuzzo M, Rossi MD, Lee D. Is postoperative function after hip or knee arthroplasty influenced by preoperative functional levels?. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24 (07) 1033-1043
  • 17 Poitras S, Wood KS, Savard J, Dervin GF, Beaule PE. Predicting early clinical function after hip or knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint Res 2015; 4 (09) 145-151
  • 18 Kennedy DM, Hanna SE, Stratford PW, Wessel J, Gollish JD. Preoperative function and gender predict pattern of functional recovery after hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21 (04) 559-566
  • 19 Jones CA, Voaklander DC, Suarez-Alma ME. Determinants of function after total knee arthroplasty. Phys Ther 2003; 83 (08) 696-706
  • 20 Hawker GA, Badley EM, Borkhoff CM. , et al. Which patients are most likely to benefit from total joint arthroplasty?. Arthritis Rheum 2013; 65 (05) 1243-1252
  • 21 Dave AJ, Selzer F, Losina E. , et al. The association of pre-operative body pain diagram scores with pain outcomes following total knee arthroplasty. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2017; 25 (05) 667-675
  • 22 Collados-Maestre I, Lizaur-Utrilla A, Martinez-Mendez D, Marco-Gomez L, Lopez-Prats FA. Concomitant low back pain impairs outcomes after primary total knee arthroplasty in patients over 65 years: a prospective, matched cohort study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2016; 136 (12) 1767-1771
  • 23 Kwon SK, Kwon HM, Kong Y, Park KK. The impact of generalized joint laxity on clinical outcomes of total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25 (11) 3360-3365
  • 24 Kim YH, Kim JS. Does TKA improve functional outcome and range of motion in patients with stiff knees?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467 (05) 1348-1354
  • 25 Fleeton G, Harmer AR, Nairn L. , et al. Self-reported knee instability before and after total knee replacement surgery. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2016; 68 (04) 463-471
  • 26 Hodges PW, Mellor R, Crossley K, Bennell K. Pain induced by injection of hypertonic saline into the infrapatellar fat pad and effect on coordination of the quadriceps muscles. Arthritis Rheum 2009; 61 (01) 70-77
  • 27 Lizaur-Utrilla A, Martinez-Mendez D, Miralles-Muñoz FA, Marco-Gomez L, Lopez-Prats FA. Risk-benefit on quality of life after total knee arthroplasty in octogenarians. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (08) 2417-2420
  • 28 Ismailidis P, Kernen R, Mueller SA. Total knee arthroplasty in severe valgus osteoarthritis excellent early results in a 90-year-old patient with a valgus deformity of 47°. Case Rep Orthop 2017; 2017: 9301017
  • 29 Gandhi R, Razak F, Tso P, Davey JR, Mahomed NN. Greater perceived helplessness in osteoarthritis predicts outcome of joint replacement surgery. J Rheumatol 2009; 36 (07) 1507-1511
  • 30 Papakostidou I, Dailiana ZH, Papapolychroniou T. , et al. Factors affecting the quality of life after total knee arthroplasties: a prospective study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2012; 13 (01) 116
  • 31 Hilton ME, Gioe T, Noorbaloochi S, Singh JA. Increasing comorbidity is associated with worsening physical function and pain after primary total knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2016; 17 (01) 421
  • 32 Hinarejos P, Ferrer T, Leal J, Torres-Claramunt R, Sánchez-Soler J, Monllau JC. Patient-reported allergies cause inferior outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24 (10) 3242-3246
  • 33 Oberbek J, Synder M. Impact of body mass index (BMI) on early outcomes of total knee arthroplasty. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 2015; 17 (02) 127-134
  • 34 Giurea A, Fraberger G, Kolbitsch P. , et al. The impact of personality traits on the outcome of total knee arthroplasty. BioMed Res Int 2016; 2016: 5282160
  • 35 Gandhi R, Davey JR, Mahomed NN. Predicting patient dissatisfaction following joint replacement surgery. J Rheumatol 2008; 35 (12) 2415-2418
  • 36 Utrillas-Compaired A, De la Torre-Escuredo BJ, Tebar-Martínez AJ, Asúnsolo-Del Barco Á. Does preoperative psychologic distress influence pain, function, and quality of life after TKA?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472 (08) 2457-2465
  • 37 Feldman CH, Dong Y, Katz JN, Donnell-Fink LA, Losina E. Association between socioeconomic status and pain, function and pain catastrophizing at presentation for total knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2015; 16 (01) 18
  • 38 Siciliani L, Verzulli R. Waiting times and socioeconomic status among elderly Europeans: evidence from SHARE. Health Econ 2009; 18 (11) 1295-1306
  • 39 Merle-Vincent F, Couris CM, Schott AM. , et al; Osteoarthritis Section of the French Society for Rheumatology. Factors predicting patient satisfaction 2 years after total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. Joint Bone Spine 2011; 78 (04) 383-386
  • 40 Lingard EA, Katz JN, Wright EA, Sledge CB. ; Kinemax Outcomes Group. Predicting the outcome of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-A (10) 2179-2186
  • 41 Hawker G, Wright J, Coyte P. , et al. Health-related quality of life after knee replacement: results of the knee replacement patient outcomes research team study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998; 80 (02) 163-173
  • 42 Frankel L, Sanmartin C, Conner-Spady B. , et al. Osteoarthritis patients' perceptions of “appropriateness” for total joint replacement surgery. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2012; 20 (09) 967-973
  • 43 Thomsen MG, Husted H, Otte KS, Holm G, Troelsen A. Do patients care about higher flexion in total knee arthroplasty? A randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2013; 14 (01) 127
  • 44 Pulavarti RS, Raut VV, McLauchlan GJ. Patella denervation in primary total knee arthroplasty - a randomized controlled trial with 2 years of follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (05) 977-981
  • 45 Scott CE, Clement ND, MacDonald DJ. , et al. Five-year survivorship and patient-reported outcome of the Triathlon single-radius total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23 (06) 1676-1683
  • 46 Quintana JM, Aguirre U, Barrio I, Orive M, Garcia S, Escobar A. Outcomes after total hip replacement based on patients' baseline status: what results can be expected?. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2012; 64 (04) 563-572
  • 47 Judge A, Arden NK, Kiran A. , et al. Interpretation of patient-reported outcomes for hip and knee replacement surgery: identification of thresholds associated with satisfaction with surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012; 94 (03) 412-418
  • 48 Escobar A, Gonzalez M, Quintana JM. , et al. Patient acceptable symptom state and OMERACT-OARSI set of responder criteria in joint replacement. Identification of cut-off values. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2012; 20 (02) 87-92
  • 49 Impellizzeri FM, Mannion AF, Naal FD, Hersche O, Leunig M. The early outcome of surgical treatment for femoroacetabular impingement: success depends on how you measure it. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2012; 20 (07) 638-645