Interdelivery Interval and Medically Indicated Preterm Delivery

Abstract

Objective The objective of this study was to examine whether a medically indicated preterm delivery is relatively more likely following longer interdelivery intervals.

Study Design This is a case–control study of women with two consecutive deliveries of a live singleton at the same institution between 2005 and 2015, with the subsequent delivery occurring preterm. Preterm deliveries were classified as spontaneous if women delivered following preterm labor, preterm premature rupture of membranes, or placental abruption. Preterm deliveries were classified as medically indicated if women underwent delivery for fetal or maternal medical indications. Interdelivery interval was categorized as < 18, 18 to 59, and 60 months or more. Characteristics of women who had a medically indicated versus spontaneous preterm delivery were compared.

Results Of the 1,276 women, 25.6% had a medically indicated preterm delivery and 74.4% had a spontaneous preterm delivery. Compared with women with an interdelivery interval of 18 to 59 months (of whom 25.7% had a preterm delivery for medical indications), women with a shorter interdelivery interval were less likely (19.3%), while women with a longer interdelivery interval were more likely (37.4%; p = 0.003) to have a medically indicated preterm delivery. This relationship persisted even when accounting for other factors.

Conclusion Preterm deliveries are more likely to be medically indicated as the interdelivery interval lengthens.

Keywords

interdelivery interval - preterm birth - preterm labor

• References

• 1 Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJ, Driscoll AK, Mathews TJ. Births: final data for 2015. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2017; 66 (01) 1
• 2 Smith GC, Pell JP, Dobbie R. Interpregnancy interval and risk of preterm birth and neonatal death: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 2003; 327 (7410): 313
• 3 Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermúdez A, Kafury-Goeta AC. Effects of birth spacing on maternal health: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196 (04) 297-308
• 4 Zhu BP, Rolfs RT, Nangle BE, Horan JM. Effect of the interval between pregnancies on perinatal outcomes. N Engl J Med 1999; 340 (08) 589-594
• 5 Getahun D, Strickland D, Ananth CV. , et al. Recurrence of preterm premature rupture of membranes in relation to interval between pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 202 (06) 570.e1-570.e6
• 6 Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermudez A, Castaño F, Norton MH. Effects of birth spacing on maternal, perinatal, infant, and child health: a systematic review of causal mechanisms. Stud Fam Plann 2012; 43 (02) 93-114
• 7 Conde-Agudelo A, Belizán JM. Maternal morbidity and mortality associated with interpregnancy interval: cross sectional study. BMJ 2000; 321 (7271): 1255-1259
• 8 Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermúdez A, Kafury-Goeta AC. Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2006; 295 (15) 1809-1823
• 9 Spong CY. Prediction and prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110 (2 Pt 1): 405-415
• 10 Laughon SK, Albert PS, Leishear K, Mendola P. The NICHD Consecutive Pregnancies Study: recurrent preterm delivery by subtype. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210 (02) 131.e1-131.e8
• 11 DeFranco EA, Stamilio DM, Boslaugh SE, Gross GA, Muglia LJ. A short interpregnancy interval is a risk factor for preterm birth and its recurrence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197 (03) 264.e1-264.e6
• 12 Koullali B, Kamphuis EI, Hof MH. , et al. The effect of interpregnancy interval on the recurrence rate of spontaneous preterm birth: a retrospective cohort study. Am J Perinatol 2017; 34 (02) 174-182
• 13 Klebanoff MA. Interpregnancy interval and pregnancy outcomes: causal or not?. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 129 (03) 405-407