Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2019; 36(01): 086-089
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1667031
SMFM Fellowship Series Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Interdelivery Interval and Medically Indicated Preterm Delivery

Annie M. Dude
1   Division of Maternal–Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
,
William A. Grobman
1   Division of Maternal–Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
› Author Affiliations Funding Research reported in this publication was supported, in part, by the National Institutes of Health's National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Grant Number UL1TR001422. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Further Information

Publication History

13 September 2017

03 June 2018

Publication Date:
17 July 2018 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective The objective of this study was to examine whether a medically indicated preterm delivery is relatively more likely following longer interdelivery intervals.

Study Design This is a case–control study of women with two consecutive deliveries of a live singleton at the same institution between 2005 and 2015, with the subsequent delivery occurring preterm. Preterm deliveries were classified as spontaneous if women delivered following preterm labor, preterm premature rupture of membranes, or placental abruption. Preterm deliveries were classified as medically indicated if women underwent delivery for fetal or maternal medical indications. Interdelivery interval was categorized as < 18, 18 to 59, and 60 months or more. Characteristics of women who had a medically indicated versus spontaneous preterm delivery were compared.

Results Of the 1,276 women, 25.6% had a medically indicated preterm delivery and 74.4% had a spontaneous preterm delivery. Compared with women with an interdelivery interval of 18 to 59 months (of whom 25.7% had a preterm delivery for medical indications), women with a shorter interdelivery interval were less likely (19.3%), while women with a longer interdelivery interval were more likely (37.4%; p = 0.003) to have a medically indicated preterm delivery. This relationship persisted even when accounting for other factors.

Conclusion Preterm deliveries are more likely to be medically indicated as the interdelivery interval lengthens.

Keywords

interdelivery interval - preterm birth - preterm labor

Note

A version of this article was presented at the 64th Society for Reproductive Investigation Annual Scientific Meeting, Orlando, FL, March 15–18, 2017.


 

  • References

  • 1 Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJ, Driscoll AK, Mathews TJ. Births: final data for 2015. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2017; 66 (01) 1
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Smith GC, Pell JP, Dobbie R. Interpregnancy interval and risk of preterm birth and neonatal death: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 2003; 327 (7410): 313
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermúdez A, Kafury-Goeta AC. Effects of birth spacing on maternal health: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196 (04) 297-308
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Zhu BP, Rolfs RT, Nangle BE, Horan JM. Effect of the interval between pregnancies on perinatal outcomes. N Engl J Med 1999; 340 (08) 589-594
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Getahun D, Strickland D, Ananth CV. , et al. Recurrence of preterm premature rupture of membranes in relation to interval between pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 202 (06) 570.e1-570.e6
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermudez A, Castaño F, Norton MH. Effects of birth spacing on maternal, perinatal, infant, and child health: a systematic review of causal mechanisms. Stud Fam Plann 2012; 43 (02) 93-114
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Conde-Agudelo A, Belizán JM. Maternal morbidity and mortality associated with interpregnancy interval: cross sectional study. BMJ 2000; 321 (7271): 1255-1259
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermúdez A, Kafury-Goeta AC. Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2006; 295 (15) 1809-1823
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Spong CY. Prediction and prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110 (2 Pt 1): 405-415
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Laughon SK, Albert PS, Leishear K, Mendola P. The NICHD Consecutive Pregnancies Study: recurrent preterm delivery by subtype. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210 (02) 131.e1-131.e8
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 DeFranco EA, Stamilio DM, Boslaugh SE, Gross GA, Muglia LJ. A short interpregnancy interval is a risk factor for preterm birth and its recurrence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197 (03) 264.e1-264.e6
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Koullali B, Kamphuis EI, Hof MH. , et al. The effect of interpregnancy interval on the recurrence rate of spontaneous preterm birth: a retrospective cohort study. Am J Perinatol 2017; 34 (02) 174-182
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Klebanoff MA. Interpregnancy interval and pregnancy outcomes: causal or not?. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 129 (03) 405-407
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar