Imaging of Postoperative Infection at the Knee Joint

Abstract

Postoperative infections of the knee are uncommon but may occur with joint arthroplasties, fracture fixation, or after arthroscopic procedures. The ultimate diagnosis is made by joint aspiration or tissue sampling. Joint aspiration and tissue sampling can be performed under imaging guidance or intraoperatively. Imaging is an important adjunct to clinical and laboratory findings and should start with radiographs. Cross-sectional imaging including magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, computed tomography (CT), nuclear studies, and ultrasound (US) are frequently used if the diagnosis is in doubt and to evaluate the extent of disease. We discuss the current algorithm in the diagnosis of various postoperative infections of the knee joint. The article addresses the utility of radiography, MR imaging, CT, US, and the most commonly used nuclear studies in the diagnosis of various postoperative knee infections and the imaging appearances of these infections on each of these diagnostic modalities.

Keywords

knee - joint - postoperative - infection - imaging

• References

• 1 Simpfendorfer CS. Radiologic approach to musculoskeletal infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2017; 31 (02) 299-324
• 2 Turecki MB, Taljanovic MS, Stubbs AY. , et al. Imaging of musculoskeletal soft tissue infections. Skeletal Radiol 2010; 39 (10) 957-971
• 3 Hochman MG, Melenevsky YV, Metter DF. , et al; Expert Panel on Musculoskeletal Imaging. ACR Appropriateness Criteria^® imaging after total knee arthroplasty. J Am Coll Radiol 2017; 14 (11S): S421-S448
• 4 Beaman FD, von Herrmann PF, Kransdorf MJ. , et al; Expert Panel on Musculoskeletal Imaging. ACR Appropriateness Criteria^® suspected osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, or soft tissue infection (excluding spine and diabetic foot). J Am Coll Radiol 2017; 14 (5S): S326-S337
• 5 American Academy of Orthpaedic Surgeons. The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee. Guidelines and evidence report. Available at: http://www.aaos.org/research/guidelines/PJIguideline.pdf . Accessed February 2, 2018
• 6 Weinstein AM, Rome BN, Reichmann WM. , et al. Estimating the burden of total knee replacement in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95 (05) 385-392
• 7 Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (04) 780-785
• 8 Losina E, Thornhill TS, Rome BN, Wright J, Katz JN. The dramatic increase in total knee replacement utilization rates in the United States cannot be fully explained by growth in population size and the obesity epidemic. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94 (03) 201-207
• 9 Chun KC, Kim KM, Chun CH. Infection following total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Relat Res 2013; 25 (03) 93-99
• 10 Sharkey PF, Lichstein PM, Shen C, Tokarski AT, Parvizi J. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today—has anything changed after 10 years?. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (09) 1774-1778
• 11 Sikorski JM, Sikorska JZ. Relative risk of different operations for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. Orthopedics 2011; 34 (12) e847-–e854
• 12 Greidanus NV, Masri BA, Garbuz DS. , et al. Use of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein level to diagnose infection before revision total knee arthroplasty. A prospective evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (07) 1409-1416
• 13 Della Valle CJ, Sporer SM, Jacobs JJ, Berger RA, Rosenberg AG, Paprosky WG. Preoperative testing for sepsis before revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22 (06) (Suppl. 02) 90-93
• 14 Ghanem E, Parvizi J, Burnett RS. , et al. Cell count and differential of aspirated fluid in the diagnosis of infection at the site of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90 (08) 1637-1643
• 15 Trampuz A, Hanssen AD, Osmon DR, Mandrekar J, Steckelberg JM, Patel R. Synovial fluid leukocyte count and differential for the diagnosis of prosthetic knee infection. Am J Med 2004; 117 (08) 556-562
• 16 Di Cesare PE, Chang E, Preston CF, Liu CJ. Serum interleukin-6 as a marker of periprosthetic infection following total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87 (09) 1921-1927
• 17 Bottner F, Wegner A, Winkelmann W, Becker K, Erren M, Götze C. Interleukin-6, procalcitonin and TNF-alpha: markers of peri-prosthetic infection following total joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89 (01) 94-99
• 18 Deirmengian C, Kardos K, Kilmartin P, Cameron A, Schiller K, Parvizi J. Diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection: has the era of the biomarker arrived?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472 (11) 3254-3262
• 19 Whitehouse JD, Friedman ND, Kirkland KB, Richardson WJ, Sexton DJ. The impact of surgical-site infections following orthopedic surgery at a community hospital and a university hospital: adverse quality of life, excess length of stay, and extra cost. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002; 23 (04) 183-189
• 20 Bachoura A, Guitton TG, Smith RM, Vrahas MS, Zurakowski D, Ring D. Infirmity and injury complexity are risk factors for surgical-site infection after operative fracture care. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469 (09) 2621-2630
• 21 Yuwen P, Wang J, Lv H. , et al. Epidemiological characteristics of adult tibial plateau fractures in plateau (Yungui) and basin (Sichuan). Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil Electron Ed 2016; 2: 103-108
• 22 Lin S, Mauffrey C, Hammerberg EM, Stahel PF, Hak DJ. Surgical site infection after open reduction and internal fixation of tibial plateau fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2014; 24 (05) 797-803
• 23 Shao J, Chang H, Zhu Y. , et al. Incidence and risk factors for surgical site infection after open reduction and internal fixation of tibial plateau fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2017; 41: 176-182
• 24 Arneson TJ, Melton III LJ, Lewallen DG, O'Fallon WM. Epidemiology of diaphyseal and distal femoral fractures in Rochester, Minnesota, 1965–1984. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; (234) 188-194
• 25 Batista BB, Salim R, Paccola CA, Kfuri Junior M. Internal fixators: a safe option for managing distal femur fractures?. Acta Ortop Bras 2014; 22 (03) 159-162
• 26 Herscovici Jr D, Whiteman KW. Retrograde nailing of the femur using an intercondylar approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996; (332): 98-104
• 27 Tornetta III P, Tiburzi D. Reamed versus nonreamed anterograde femoral nailing. J Orthop Trauma 2000; 14 (01) 15-19
• 28 Papadokostakis G, Papakostidis C, Dimitriou R, Giannoudis PV. The role and efficacy of retrograding nailing for the treatment of diaphyseal and distal femoral fractures: a systematic review of the literature. Injury 2005; 36 (07) 813-822
• 29 Halvorson JJ, Barnett M, Jackson B, Birkedal JP. Risk of septic knee following retrograde intramedullary nailing of open and closed femur fractures. J Orthop Surg 2012; 7: 7
• 30 Balato G, Di Donato SL, Ascione T. , et al. Knee septic arthritis after arthroscopy: incidence, risk factors, functional outcome, and infection eradication rate. Joints 2017; 5 (02) 107-113
• 31 Cancienne JM, Mahon HS, Dempsey IJ, Miller MD, Werner BC. Patient-related risk factors for infection following knee arthroscopy: an analysis of over 700,000 patients from two large databases. Knee 2017; 24 (03) 594-600
• 32 Clement RC, Haddix KP, Creighton RA, Spang JT, Tennant JN, Kamath GV. Risk factors for infection after knee arthroscopy: analysis of 595,083 cases from 3 United States databases. Arthroscopy 2016; 32 (12) 2556-2561
• 33 Buller LT, Best MJ, Baraga MG, Kaplan LD. Trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the United States. Orthop J Sports Med 2014; 3 (01) 2325967114563664
• 34 Sharp JW, Kani KK, Gee A, Mulcahy H, Chew FS, Porrino J. Anterior cruciate ligament fixation devices: expected imaging appearance and common complications. Eur J Radiol 2018; 99: 17-27
• 35 Binnet MS, Başarir K. Risk and outcome of infection after different arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques. Arthroscopy 2007; 23 (08) 862-868
• 36 Brophy RH, Wright RW, Huston LJ, Nwosu SK, Spindler KP. ; MOON Knee Group. Factors associated with infection following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97 (06) 450-454
• 37 Wang C, Ao Y, Wang J, Hu Y, Cui G, Yu J. Septic arthritis after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a retrospective analysis of incidence, presentation, treatment, and cause. Arthroscopy 2009; 25 (03) 243-249
• 38 Bencardino JT, Beltran J, Feldman MI, Rose DJ. MR imaging of complications of anterior cruciate ligament graft reconstruction. Radiographics 2009; 29 (07) 2115-2126
• 39 Schollin-Borg M, Michaëlsson K, Rahme H. Presentation, outcome, and cause of septic arthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a case control study. Arthroscopy 2003; 19 (09) 941-947
• 40 Judd D, Bottoni C, Kim D, Burke M, Hooker S. Infections following arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2006; 22 (04) 375-384
• 41 Barker JU, Drakos MC, Maak TG, Warren RF, Williams III RJ, Allen AA. Effect of graft selection on the incidence of postoperative infection in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2010; 38 (02) 281-286
• 42 Maletis GB, Inacio MC, Reynolds S, Desmond JL, Maletis MM, Funahashi TT. Incidence of postoperative anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction infections: graft choice makes a difference. Am J Sports Med 2013; 41 (08) 1780-1785
• 43 Walz DM. Postoperative imaging of the knee: meniscus, cartilage, and ligaments. Radiol Clin North Am 2016; 54 (05) 931-950
• 44 Osti M, Hierzer D, Seibert FJ, Benedetto KP. The arthroscopic all-inside tibial-inlay reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament: medium-term functional results and complication rate. J Knee Surg 2017; 30 (03) 238-243
• 45 Randelli F, Brioschi M, Randelli P, Ambrogi F, Sdao S, Aliprandi A. Fluoroscopy- vs ultrasound-guided aspiration techniques in the management of periprosthetic joint infection: which is the best?. Radiol Med (Torino) 2018; 123 (01) 28-35
• 46 Sperandeo M, Trovato FM, Melillo N, Dimitri L, Musumeci G, Guglielmi G. The role of ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in musculoskeletal diseases. Eur J Radiol 2017; 90: 234-244
• 47 Yee DK, Chiu KY, Yan CH, Ng FY. Review article: Joint aspiration for diagnosis of periprosthetic infection. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2013; 21 (02) 236-240 Review
• 48 Marson BA, Walters ST, Bloch BV, Sehat K. Two-stage revision surgery for infected total knee replacements: reasonable function and high success rate with the use of primary knee replacement implants as temporary spacers. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2018; 28 (01) 109-115
• 49 Sancineto CF, Barla JD. Treatment of long bone osteomyelitis with a mechanically stable intramedullar antibiotic dispenser: nineteen consecutive cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up. J Trauma 2008; 65 (06) 1416-1420
• 50 Do TD, Sutter R, Skornitzke S, Weber MACT. CT- und MRT-Bildgebung bei orthopädischen Implantaten. RoFo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed 2018; 190 (01) 31-41
• 51 Zhou C, Zhao YE, Luo S. , et al. Monoenergetic imaging of dual-energy CT reduces artifacts from implanted metal orthopedic devices in patients with factures. Acad Radiol 2011; 18 (10) 1252-1257
• 52 Fayad LM, Patra A, Fishman EK. Value of 3D CT in defining skeletal complications of orthopedic hardware in the postoperative patient. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193 (04) 1155-1163
• 53 Fayad LM, Carrino JA, Fishman EK. Musculoskeletal infection: role of CT in the emergency department. Radiographics 2007; 27 (06) 1723-1736
• 54 Kaim AH, Gross T, von Schulthess GK. Imaging of chronic posttraumatic osteomyelitis. Eur Radiol 2002; 12 (05) 1193-1202
• 55 Heyse TJ, Chong R, Davis J, Boettner F, Haas SB, Potter HG. MRI analysis for rotation of total knee components. Knee 2012; 19 (05) 571-575
• 56 Papakonstantinou O, Chung CB, Chanchairujira K, Resnick DL. Complications of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: MR imaging. Eur Radiol 2003; 13 (05) 1106-1117
• 57 Clutton JM, Donaldson O, Perera A, Morgan-Jones R. Treating osteomyelitis of major limb amputations with a modified Lautenbach technique. Injury 2017; 48 (11) 2496-2500
• 58 Plodkowski AJ, Hayter CL, Miller TT, Nguyen JT, Potter HG. Lamellated hyperintense synovitis: potential MR imaging sign of an infected knee arthroplasty. Radiology 2013; 266 (01) 256-260
• 59 Li AE, Sneag DB, Greditzer IV HG, Johnson CC, Miller TT, Potter HG. Total knee arthroplasty: diagnostic accuracy of patterns of synovitis at MR imaging. Radiology 2016; 281 (02) 499-506
• 60 Duryea D, Bernard S, Flemming D, Walker E, French C. Outcomes in diabetic foot ulcer patients with isolated T2 marrow signal abnormality in the underlying bone: should the diagnosis of “osteitis” be changed to “early osteomyelitis”?. Skeletal Radiol 2017; 46 (10) 1327-1333
• 61 McGuinness B, Wilson N, Doyle AJ. The “penumbra sign” on T1-weighted MRI for differentiating musculoskeletal infection from tumour. Skeletal Radiol 2007; 36 (05) 417-421
• 62 Chun CW, Jung JY, Baik JS, Jee WH, Kim SK, Shin SH. Detection of soft-tissue abscess: comparison of diffusion-weighted imaging to contrast-enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2018; 47 (01) 60-68
• 63 Koch KM, Bhave S, Gaddipati A. , et al. Multispectral diffusion-weighted imaging near metal implants. Magn Reson Med 2018; 79 (02) 987-993
• 64 Bancroft LW. MR imaging of infectious processes of the knee. Radiol Clin North Am 2007; 45 (06) 931-941 , v
• 65 Gimber LH, Melville DM, Klauser AS, Witte RS, Arif-Tiwari H, Taljanovic MS. Artifacts at musculoskeletal US: resident and fellow education feature. Radiographics 2016; 36 (02) 479-480
• 66 Love C, Marwin SE, Palestro CJ. Nuclear medicine and the infected joint replacement. Semin Nucl Med 2009; 39 (01) 66-78
• 67 Palestro CJ, Love C. Role of nuclear medicine for diagnosing infection of recently implanted lower extremity arthroplasties. Semin Nucl Med 2017; 47 (06) 630-638
• 68 Verberne SJ, Sonnega RJ, Temmerman OP, Raijmakers PG. What is the accuracy of nuclear imaging in the assessment of periprosthetic knee infection? A meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017; 475 (05) 1395-1410
• 69 Palestro CJ. Nuclear medicine and the failed joint replacement: past, present, and future. World J Radiol 2014; 6 (07) 446-458
• 70 Palestro CJ, Swyer AJ, Kim CK, Goldsmith SJ. Infected knee prosthesis: diagnosis with In-111 leukocyte, Tc-99m sulfur colloid, and Tc-99m MDP imaging. Radiology 1991; 179 (03) 645-648
• 71 Love C, Marwin SE, Tomas MB. , et al. Diagnosing infection in the failed joint replacement: a comparison of coincidence detection 18F-FDG and 111In-labeled leukocyte/99mTc-sulfur colloid marrow imaging. J Nucl Med 2004; 45 (11) 1864-1871
• 72 Joseph TN, Mujtaba M, Chen AL. , et al. Efficacy of combined technetium-99m sulfur colloid/indium-111 leukocyte scans to detect infected total hip and knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16 (06) 753-758
• 73 Basu S, Kwee TC, Saboury B. , et al. FDG PET for diagnosing infection in hip and knee prostheses: prospective study in 221 prostheses and subgroup comparison with combined (111)In-labeled leukocyte/(99m)Tc-sulfur colloid bone marrow imaging in 88 prostheses. Clin Nucl Med 2014; 39 (07) 609-615
• 74 Kwee TC, Kwee RM, Alavi A. FDG-PET for diagnosing prosthetic joint infection: systematic review and metaanalysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2008; 35 (11) 2122-2132
• 75 Alavi A, Werner TJ. FDG-PET imaging to detect and characterize infectious disorders; an unavoidable path for the foreseeable future. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2017; 44 (03) 417-420
• 76 Jansen JA, Smit F, Pereira Arias-Bouda LM. The role of nuclear medicine techniques in differentiation between septic and aseptic loosening of total hip and knee arthroplasty. Tijdschr Nucl Geneeskd 2012; 34: 988-994
• 77 Pelosi E, Baiocco C, Pennone M. , et al. 99mTc-HMPAO-leukocyte scintigraphy in patients with symptomatic total hip or knee arthroplasty: improved diagnostic accuracy by means of semiquantitative evaluation. J Nucl Med 2004; 45 (03) 438-444
• 78 Scher DM, Pak K, Lonner JH, Finkel JE, Zuckerman JD, Di Cesare PE. The predictive value of indium-111 leukocyte scans in the diagnosis of infected total hip, knee, or resection arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15 (03) 295-300
• 79 Delank KS, Schmidt M, Michael JW, Dietlein M, Schicha H, Eysel P. The implications of 18F-FDG PET for the diagnosis of endoprosthetic loosening and infection in hip and knee arthroplasty: results from a prospective, blinded study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2006; 7: 20
• 80 Houshmand S, Salavati A, Hess S, Werner TJ, Alavi A, Zaidi H. An update on novel quantitative techniques in the context of evolving whole-body PET imaging. PET Clin 2015; 10 (01) 45-58
• 81 Bleeker-Rovers CP, Rennen HJ, Boerman OC. , et al. 99mTc-labeled interleukin 8 for the scintigraphic detection of infection and inflammation: first clinical evaluation. J Nucl Med 2007; 48 (03) 337-343
• 82 Gratz S, Behr TM, Reize P, Pfestroff A, Kampen WU, Höffken H. (99m)Tc-Fab' fragments (sulesomab) for imaging septically loosened total knee arthroplasty. J Int Med Res 2009; 37 (01) 54-67
• 83 Arteaga de Murphy C, Gemmel F, Balter J. Clinical trial of specific imaging of infections. Nucl Med Commun 2010; 31 (08) 726-733