Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1672142
Correction of the Crooked Nose
Support/Funding No sources of support or funding were received for this work.Publication History
Publication Date:
08 October 2018 (online)
Abstract
Successful management of the crooked nose can be a formidable task and requires a systematic approach that begins with an understanding of the patients' aesthetic desires, expectations, and functional symptoms. Dividing the nose into thirds and organizing a plan to correct each region individually can simplify the preoperative planning. There are two broad philosophical strategies of surgical management: engineering (reconstructive) and artistic (camouflaging). While the camouflaging technique is helpful for minor asymmetries, protrusions, and depressions, the engineering approach is best for more extreme corrections. The surgeon must be skilled in both approaches as either one or a combination of the two may yield the best results. Once corrected, postoperative care is essential to obtain optimal outcomes.
-
References
- 1 Rohrich RJ, Adams Jr WP. Nasal fracture management: Minimizing secondary nasal deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106 (02) 266-273
- 2 Roofe SB, Murakami CS. Treatment of the posttraumatic and postrhinoplasty crooked nose. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2006; 14 (04) 279-289 , v
- 3 Menger DJ. Surgical treatment of the twisted nose. Clin Plast Surg 2016; 43 (01) 95-98
- 4 Ahmad J, Rohrich RJ. The crooked nose. Clin Plast Surg 2016; 43 (01) 99-113
- 5 Stepnick D, Guyuron B. Surgical treatment of the crooked nose. Clin Plast Surg 2010; 37 (02) 313-325
- 6 Thomas JR. Advanced Therapy in Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Shelton, Conn.: People's Medical Pub. House; 2010
- 7 Cerkes N. The crooked nose: principles of treatment. Aesthet Surg J 2011; 31 (02) 241-257
- 8 Ewart CJ, Leonard CJ, Harper JG, Yu J. A simple and inexpensive method of preoperative computer imaging for rhinoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 2006; 56 (01) 46-49
- 9 Weissler JM, Stern CS, Schreiber JE, Amirlak B, Tepper OM. The evolution of photography and three-dimensional imaging in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (03) 761-769
- 10 Lekakis G, Claes P, Hamilton III GS, Hellings PW. Evolution of preoperative rhinoplasty consult by computer imaging. Facial Plast Surg 2016; 32 (01) 80-87
- 11 Dobratz EJ, Hilger PA. Osteotomies. Clin Plast Surg 2010; 37 (02) 301-311
- 12 Most SP, Murakami CS. A modern approach to nasal osteotomies. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2005; 13 (01) 85-92
- 13 Rohrich RJ, Cho MJ. The role of tranexamic acid in plastic surgery: review and technical considerations. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (02) 507-515
- 14 Gubisch W. Extracorporeal septoplasty for the markedly deviated septum. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2005; 7 (04) 218-226
- 15 Wilson MA, Mobley SR. Extracorporeal septoplasty: complications and new techniques. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2011; 13 (02) 85-90
- 16 Ross Mobley S, Long J. Extracorporeal septoplasty: assessing functional outcomes using the validated nasal obstruction symptom evaluation score over a 3-year period. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (01) 151e-163e
- 17 Boccieri A. Evolution of the septal crossbar graft technique. Facial Plast Surg 2006; 22 (04) 255-265
- 18 Cingi C, Muluk NB, Ulusoy S. , et al. Nasal tip sutures: Techniques and indications. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2015; 29 (06) e205-e211
- 19 Ozucer B, Yildirim YS, Veyseller B. , et al. Effect of postrhinoplasty taping on postoperative edema and nasal draping: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2016; 18 (03) 157-163