PaO2/FiO2 Ratio as Predictor of Mortality in Neonates with Meconium Aspiration Syndrome

Anand Narayanan; Prerna Batra; Mohammed Mounis Akbar Faridi; Deepika Harit

doi:10.1055/s-0038-1672171

American Journal of Perinatology, Table of Contents

Am J Perinatol 2019; 36(06): 609-614
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1672171

Original Article

Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

PaO₂/FiO₂ Ratio as Predictor of Mortality in Neonates with Meconium Aspiration Syndrome

Anand Narayanan

¹Department of Pediatrics, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Tegh Bahadur Hospital, University of Delhi, Delhi, India

,

Prerna Batra

¹Department of Pediatrics, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Tegh Bahadur Hospital, University of Delhi, Delhi, India

,

Mohammed Mounis Akbar Faridi

¹Department of Pediatrics, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Tegh Bahadur Hospital, University of Delhi, Delhi, India

,

Deepika Harit

¹Department of Pediatrics, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Tegh Bahadur Hospital, University of Delhi, Delhi, India

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Objectives Partial arterial pressure of oxygen/fraction of oxygen in inspired air (PaO₂/FiO₂) ratio has been used as a predictor of outcome in some neonatal conditions, but has not been used in meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS). This study was conducted with the objective to study if the PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio of < 200 at 6, 12, and 24 hours of life can predict mortality in neonates with MAS.

Study Design Two hundred neonates with MAS were included in the study. PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio was calculated at 6, 12, and 24 hours of life. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratio at cut-off < 200 to predict mortality was calculated.

Results PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio at cut-off of < 200 was found to predict mortality in neonates with MAS with 94.1% sensitivity and 96.6% specificity. It was also able to predict development of severe MAS.

Conclusion PaO₂/FiO₂ at < 200 can predict all-cause mortality in neonates with MAS. It can be used as vital tool in identifying newborns at high risk, thus helping in focused care.

Keywords

PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio - MAS - neonates

Full Text

References

References
1 Burris HH. Meconium aspiration. In: Cloherty JP, Eichenwald EC, Hansen AR, Stark AR. , eds. Manual of Neonatal Care. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2012: 429-434
2 Anwar Z, Butt TK, Kazi MY. Mortality in meconium aspiration syndrome in hospitalized babies. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2011; 21 (11) 695-699
3 Gupta V, Bhatia BD, Mishra OP. Meconium stained amniotic fluid: antenatal, intrapartum and neonatal attributes. Indian Pediatr 1996; 33 (04) 293-297
4 K M, Batra P, Faridi MMA, Singh NP. Procalcitonin as predictor of bacterial infection in meconium aspiration syndrome. Am J Perinatol 2018; 35 (08) 769-773
5 Louis D, Sundaram V, Mukhopadhyay K, Dutta S, Kumar P. Predictors of mortality in neonates with meconium aspiration syndrome. Indian Pediatr 2014; 51 (08) 637-640
6 Dargaville PA, Copnell B. ; Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network. The epidemiology of meconium aspiration syndrome: incidence, risk factors, therapies, and outcome. Pediatrics 2006; 117 (05) 1712-1721
7 Singh SN, Srivastava R, Singh A. , et al. Respiratory distress including meconium aspiration syndrome in vigorous neonates born through meconium stained amniotic fluid: incidence, onset, severity and predictors at birth. Indian J Pediatr 2013; 80 (07) 538-543
8 Lin HC, Su BH, Lin TW, Peng CT, Tsai CH. Risk factors of mortality in meconium aspiration syndrome: review of 314 cases. Acta Paediatr Taiwan 2004; 45 (01) 30-34
9 Esteve F, Lopez-Delgado JC, Javierre C. , et al. Evaluation of the PaO2/FiO2 ratio after cardiac surgery as a predictor of outcome during hospital stay. BMC Anesthesiol 2014; 14: 83
10 Márquez-González H, Jiménez-Báez MV, Muñoz-Ramírez CM. , et al. Development and validation of the Neonatal Mortality Score-9 Mexico to predict mortality in critically ill neonates. Arch Argent Pediatr 2015; 113 (03) 213-220
11 Dimitriou G, Fouzas S, Giannakopoulos I, Papadopoulos VG, Decavalas G, Mantagos S. Prediction of respiratory failure in late-preterm infants with respiratory distress at birth. Eur J Pediatr 2011; 170 (01) 45-50
12 Li T, Jiang H, Liu DY, Li XH. Risk factors for the failure of the InSure method in very preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome [in Chinese]. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi 2014; 16 (06) 610-613
13 Gentili A, Pasini L, Iannella E. , et al. Predictive outcome indexes in neonatal congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2015; 28 (13) 1602-1607
14 Szymonowicz W, Yu VY, Wilson FE. Antecedents of periventricular haemorrhage in infants weighing 1250 g or less at birth. Arch Dis Child 1984; 59 (01) 13-17
15 Shann F, Pearson G, Slater A, Wilkinson K. Paediatric index of mortality (PIM): a mortality prediction model for children in intensive care. Intensive Care Med 1997; 23 (02) 201-207
16 Wiswell TE, Bent RC. Meconium staining and the meconium aspiration syndrome. Unresolved issues. Pediatr Clin North Am 1993; 40 (05) 955-981
17 Rusmawati A, Haksari EL, Naning R. Downes score as a clinical assessment for hypoxemia in neonates with respiratory distress. Paediatr Indones 2008; 48: 342-345
18 Vora H, Nair S. Study of meconium aspiration syndrome in neonates. GCSMC J Med Sci 2014; 3: 64-66
19 Yoder BA, Kirsch EA, Barth WH, Gordon MC. Changing obstetric practices associated with decreasing incidence of meconium aspiration syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99 (5 Pt 1): 731-739
20 Fischer C, Rybakowski C, Ferdynus C, Sagot P, Gouyon JB. A population-based study of meconium aspiration syndrome in neonates born between 37 and 43 weeks of gestation. Int J Pediatr 2012; 2012: 321545
21 Hernández C, Little BB, Dax JS, Gilstrap III LC, Rosenfeld CR. Prediction of the severity of meconium aspiration syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169 (01) 61-70
22 Bhaskar SH, Karthikeyan G, Bhat BV, Bhatia BD. Antenatal risk factors and neonatal outcome in meconium aspiration syndrome. Indian J Matern Child Heal 1997; 8 (01) 9-12